Suppr超能文献

可进化性:填补适应性与长期适应性数学概念之间的解释空白。

Evolvability: filling the explanatory gap between adaptedness and the long-term mathematical conception of fitness.

作者信息

Bourrat Pierrick, Deaven Katie, Villegas Cristina

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109 Australia.

Department of Philosophy and Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia.

出版信息

Biol Philos. 2024;39(4):15. doi: 10.1007/s10539-024-09951-3. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

Abstract

The new foundation for the propensity interpretation of fitness (PIF), developed by Pence and Ramsey (Br J Philos Sci 64:851-881, 2013), describes fitness as a probability distribution that encompasses all possible daughter populations to which the organism may give rise, including daughter populations in which traits might change and the possible environments that members of the daughter populations might encounter. This long-term definition of fitness is general enough to avoid counterexamples faced by previous mathematical conceptions of PIF. However, there seem to be downsides to its generality: the ecological role of fitness involves describing the degree of adaptedness between an organism and the specific environment it inhabits. When all possible changes in traits and all possible environments that a daughter population may encounter are included in the concept, it becomes difficult to see how fitness can fulfill this role. In this paper, we argue that this is a feature of Pence and Ramsey's view rather than a bug: long-term fitness accommodates evolvability considerations, which concern the role that variation plays in evolutionary processes. Building on the foundations, we show that Pence and Ramsey's fitness--can be partitioned into fourths: adaptedness, robustness of adaptedness, and two facets of evolvability. Conceptualizing these last three components forces us to consider the role played by grains of description of both organisms and the environment when thinking about long-term fitness. They track the possibility that there could be a change in type in a daughter population as a way of responding to environmental challenges, or that the type persists in the face of novel environments. We argue that these components are just as salient as adaptedness for long-term fitness. Together, this decomposition of provides a more accurate picture of the factors involved in long-term evolutionary success.

摘要

彭斯和拉姆齐(《英国科学哲学杂志》64:851 - 881,2013年)提出的适应性倾向解释(PIF)的新基础,将适应性描述为一种概率分布,它涵盖了生物体可能产生的所有可能的子群体,包括性状可能发生变化的子群体以及子群体成员可能遇到的可能环境。这种对适应性的长期定义足够通用,避免了先前PIF数学概念所面临的反例。然而,其通用性似乎也有缺点:适应性的生态作用涉及描述生物体与其所栖息的特定环境之间的适应程度。当性状的所有可能变化以及子群体可能遇到的所有可能环境都包含在这个概念中时,就很难理解适应性如何能发挥这一作用。在本文中,我们认为这是彭斯和拉姆齐观点的一个特点而非缺陷:长期适应性考虑了可进化性因素,即变异在进化过程中所起的作用。在此基础上,我们表明彭斯和拉姆齐的适应性可以分为四个部分:适应性、适应性的稳健性以及可进化性的两个方面。对这最后三个组成部分进行概念化,迫使我们在思考长期适应性时考虑生物体和环境描述粒度所起的作用。它们追踪子群体中可能发生类型变化以应对环境挑战的可能性,或者类型在面对新环境时持续存在的可能性。我们认为这些组成部分对于长期适应性而言与适应性同样重要。总之,这种分解为长期进化成功所涉及的因素提供了更准确的图景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f69e/11249714/23f6da6b4e1c/10539_2024_9951_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验