Gómez-Recio Marta, Bastir Markus, LoMauro Antonella, Aliverti Andrea, Beyer Benoit
Departamento de Paleobiología, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria (DEIB), Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jul 17;11(7):240548. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240548. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Breathing motion is based on the differential activity of the thoracic, diaphragmatic and abdominal muscles. Muscle contributions differ between rest and exercise conditions and depend on posture and other factors. Traditionally, these changes are investigated on volumetric data using optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP). OEP offers insight into size variations of different chest wall (CW) compartments but does not provide three-dimensional visualization methods of CW breathing kinematics. Here we explore the use of three-dimensional geometric morphometrics to analyse size and shape changes caused by spontaneous breathing motion during quiet (QB), and recovery breathing (REC, immediately after heavy exercise) in two different postures (SIT, sitting on cycle ergometer; STA, standing position). Our findings show that size and shape differ significantly between inspiration and expiration and that differences are greater in REC than in QB. However, this is achieved by stronger expiration in SIT but by greater expiratory and inspiratory movements in STA. Shape analysis suggests that these differences may be attributed to constrained mobility of the shoulder girdle and a minor thoracic spine extension during inspiration owing to position on the ergometer. Breathing motion in STA seems biomechanically less constrained. Geometric morphometrics analyses can provide additional insights into data obtained by OEP.
呼吸运动基于胸部、膈肌和腹部肌肉的不同活动。在静息和运动状态下,肌肉的作用有所不同,并且取决于姿势和其他因素。传统上,这些变化是使用光电体积描记法(OEP)在容积数据上进行研究的。OEP能够洞察不同胸壁(CW)腔室的大小变化,但无法提供胸壁呼吸运动学的三维可视化方法。在此,我们探索使用三维几何形态测量学来分析在两种不同姿势(SIT,坐在自行车测力计上;STA,站立位)下,安静呼吸(QB)和恢复呼吸(REC,剧烈运动后立即进行)期间自发呼吸运动所引起的大小和形状变化。我们的研究结果表明,吸气和呼气之间的大小和形状存在显著差异,并且REC中的差异大于QB中的差异。然而,在SIT中是通过更强的呼气来实现这一点,而在STA中则是通过更大的呼气和吸气运动来实现。形状分析表明,这些差异可能归因于由于在测力计上的位置,吸气时肩带活动受限以及胸椎轻微伸展。STA中的呼吸运动在生物力学上似乎受限较小。几何形态测量学分析可以为通过OEP获得的数据提供更多见解。