Enhancing the quality and efficiency of regulatory science literature reviews through innovation and collaboration with library and information science experts.
作者信息
Stevens Elizabeth R, Laynor Gregory
机构信息
Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Health Sciences Library, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
出版信息
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 3;11:1434427. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1434427. eCollection 2024.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Enhancing the quality and efficiency of regulatory science literature reviews through innovation and collaboration with library and information science experts.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 3;11:1434427. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1434427. eCollection 2024.
2
Evidence-based biomedical research in Sub-Saharan Africa: how library and information science professionals contribute to systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Jan 1;110(1):72-80. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1249.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?
Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 25;2:78. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-78.
5
Revolutionising health and social care: innovative solutions for a brighter tomorrow - a systematic review of the literature.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 12;24(1):809. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11099-5.
6
Searching and reporting in Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews: A systematic assessment of current methods.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 21;20(3):e1432. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1432. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Science-based health innovation in Uganda: creative strategies for applying research to development.
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2010 Dec 13;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-10-S1-S5.
8
A study on scientific collaboration and co-authorship patterns in library and information science studies in Iran between 2005 and 2009.
J Educ Health Promot. 2014 Aug 28;3:99. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.139681. eCollection 2014.
9
Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: consideration of a range of search techniques.
Health Info Libr J. 2010 Jun;27(2):114-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00863.x.
10
Interdisciplinary collaboration between nursing and engineering in health care: A scoping review.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 May;117:103900. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103900. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
引用本文的文献
1
Information Practice as Dialogue: The Case for Collaboration in Evidence Searching and Finding for More Complex Reviews.
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2025 Apr 28;3(3):e70029. doi: 10.1002/cesm.70029. eCollection 2025 May.
本文引用的文献
1
Search still matters: information retrieval in the era of generative AI.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Sep 1;31(9):2159-2161. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae014.
2
Librarians and information specialists as methodological peer-reviewers: a case-study of the International Journal of Health Governance.
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2024 Jan 19;9(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00142-4.
3
More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 - a new record.
Nature. 2023 Dec;624(7992):479-481. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-03974-8.
4
Evaluating the efficacy of artificial intelligence tools for the automation of systematic reviews in cancer research: A systematic review.
Cancer Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;88:102511. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102511. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
5
Recognizing the value of meta-research and making it easier to find.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2023 Oct 2;111(4):839-843. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2023.1758.
6
Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora's Box Has Been Opened.
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 31;25:e46924. doi: 10.2196/46924.
7
A real-world evaluation of the implementation of NLP technology in abstract screening of a systematic review.
Res Synth Methods. 2023 Jul;14(4):608-621. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1636. Epub 2023 May 25.
8
Why do researchers co-author evidence syntheses with librarians? A mixed-methods study.
Res Synth Methods. 2023 May;14(3):489-503. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1629. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
9
Development of benchmark datasets for text mining and sentiment analysis to accelerate regulatory literature review.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023 Jan;137:105287. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105287. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
10
In a pilot study, automated real-time systematic review updates were feasible, accurate, and work-saving.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Jan;153:26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.08.013. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
Zotero 插件