• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Recognizing the value of meta-research and making it easier to find.认识到元研究的价值并使其更易于查找。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2023 Oct 2;111(4):839-843. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2023.1758.
2
Evidence-based librarianship: an overview.循证图书馆学:概述
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 2000 Oct;88(4):289-302.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
The randomised controlled trial design: unrecognized opportunities for health sciences librarianship.随机对照试验设计:健康科学图书馆学未被认识到的机遇。
Health Info Libr J. 2003 Jun;20 Suppl 1:34-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2532.20.s1.7.x.
5
Developing evidence-based librarianship: practical steps for implementation.发展循证图书馆学:实施的实际步骤。
Health Info Libr J. 2002 Jun;19(2):61-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-1842.2002.00372.x.
6
Evidence-based librarianship: searching for the needed EBL evidence.循证图书馆学:寻找所需的循证图书馆学证据。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2000 Fall;19(3):1-18. doi: 10.1300/J115v19n03_01.
7
*informatics: Identifying and Tracking Informatics Sub-Discipline Terms in the Literature.信息学:识别和追踪文献中的信息学子学科术语。
Methods Inf Med. 2015;54(6):530-9. doi: 10.3414/ME14-01-0088. Epub 2015 May 22.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Searching biomedical databases on complementary medicine: the use of controlled vocabulary among authors, indexers and investigators.在生物医学数据库中检索补充医学相关内容:作者、索引编制人员和研究人员对受控词汇的使用情况。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2003 Jul 7;3:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-3-3.
10
Cohort studies in health sciences librarianship.健康科学图书馆学中的队列研究。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2002 Oct;90(4):380-92.

引用本文的文献

1
Global trends and research gaps in deep brain stimulation for neurodevelopmental disorders: a scientometrics exploration of functional and behavioral outcomes.神经发育障碍的深部脑刺激的全球趋势和研究差距:功能和行为结果的科学计量学探索
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Aug 29;19:1649726. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1649726. eCollection 2025.
2
Enhancing the quality and efficiency of regulatory science literature reviews through innovation and collaboration with library and information science experts.通过与图书馆和信息科学专家的创新与合作,提高监管科学文献综述的质量和效率。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 3;11:1434427. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1434427. eCollection 2024.
3
Identifying meta-research with researchers as study subjects: Protocol for a scoping review.以研究人员为研究对象的元研究识别:范围综述研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 May 20;19(5):e0303905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303905. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Keep calm and carry on: moral panic, predatory publishers, peer review, and the emperor's new clothes.保持冷静,继续前行:道德恐慌、掠夺性出版商、同行评审和皇帝的新衣。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Apr 1;110(2):233-239. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1441.
2
MeSH and text-word search strategies: precision, recall, and their implications for library instruction.主题词和文本词检索策略:精密度、召回率及其对图书馆教学的意义。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Jan 1;110(1):23-33. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1283.
3
Meta-research in pharmacy: Time for a look in the mirror.药学元研究:是时候照照镜子了。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Dec;17(12):2028-2035. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
4
Why do biomedical researchers learn to program? An exploratory investigation.为什么生物医学研究人员要学习编程?一项探索性研究。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Jan;108(1):29-35. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2020.819. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
5
Shared first authorship.共同第一作者。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Oct;107(4):618-620. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.700. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
6
Guidelines for open peer review implementation.开放同行评审实施指南。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019 Feb 27;4:4. doi: 10.1186/s41073-019-0063-9. eCollection 2019.
7
Predatory publications in evidence syntheses.证据综合中的掠夺性出版物。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Jan;107(1):57-61. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.491. Epub 2019 Jan 1.
8
A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches.一种系统的检索方法:一种开发文献检索的高效且完整的方法。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Oct;106(4):531-541. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.283. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
9
The relative citation ratio: what is it and why should medical librarians care?相对引用率:它是什么以及医学图书馆员为何要关心?
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Oct;106(4):508-513. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.499. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
10
Meta-research: Why research on research matters.元研究:为何研究研究很重要。
PLoS Biol. 2018 Mar 13;16(3):e2005468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005468. eCollection 2018 Mar.

认识到元研究的价值并使其更易于查找。

Recognizing the value of meta-research and making it easier to find.

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2023 Oct 2;111(4):839-843. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2023.1758.

DOI:10.5195/jmla.2023.1758
PMID:37928126
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10621717/
Abstract

Meta-research is a bourgeoning field studying topics with significant relevance to health sciences librarianship, such as research reproducibility, peer review, and open access. As a discipline that studies research itself and the practices of researchers, meta-research spans disciplines and encompasses a broad spectrum of topics and methods. The breadth of meta-research presents a significant challenge for identifying published meta-research studies. Introducing a subject heading for meta-research in the controlled vocabularies of literature databases has the potential to increase the visibility of meta-research, further advance the field, and expand its impact on research practices. Given the relatively recent designation of meta-research as a field and its expanding use as a term, now is the time to develop appropriate indexing vocabulary. We seek to call attention to the value of meta-research for health sciences librarianship, describe the challenges of identifying meta-research literature with currently available key terms, and highlight the need to establish controlled vocabulary specific to meta-research.

摘要

元研究是一个新兴的领域,研究与健康科学图书馆学密切相关的主题,如研究的可重复性、同行评审和开放获取。作为一门研究研究本身和研究人员实践的学科,元研究跨越学科领域,涵盖了广泛的主题和方法。元研究的广泛性给确定已发表的元研究文献带来了重大挑战。在文献数据库的受控词汇中引入元研究主题词有潜力提高元研究的可见度,进一步推动该领域的发展,并扩大其对研究实践的影响。鉴于元研究最近才被指定为一个领域,并且其作为一个术语的使用范围不断扩大,现在是时候制定适当的索引词汇了。我们旨在强调元研究对健康科学图书馆学的价值,描述当前可用关键词识别元研究文献的挑战,并强调需要建立专门针对元研究的受控词汇。