Iqbal Muhammad, Mohamed Wail, Shendy Mostafa, Shanahan Anthony, Steggall Martin, Brown Gareth
Urology, Cwm Taf University Health Board, Royal Glamorgan Hospital Llantrisant, Cardiff, GBR.
Urology, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Cardiff, GBR.
Cureus. 2024 Jun 17;16(6):e62537. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62537. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Background and objectives Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a multifactorial disease associated with many medical co-morbidities and risk factors commonly encountered in primary care. Initial management includes lifestyle changes and the treatment of any identifiable conditions. Guidelines exist recommending the assessment and management of sufferers with clear indications for referral to secondary care. With the outbreak of COVID-19, non-urgent medical services, including ED, were suspended, creating a significant waiting list for these patients. The aim of this study was to review the management of men in both primary and secondary care who had been referred to a dedicated ED service. Materials and methods A retrospective review of men referred to secondary care between June 2018 and April 2021 with ED was undertaken, reviewing whether the guidelines published by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and GP Notebook for the assessment, initial treatment, and referral were followed by the primary care clinician. A secondary aim was to record the outcome of those men after review in a secondary care dedicated ED clinic. Results One hundred and forty-eight men were reviewed in the ED clinic, with 55 men (37.2%) requiring an intervention that was appropriate to have been delivered in primary care. The majority of those (76.3%) were successfully managed with a phosphodiesterase inhibitor. Of those treated in secondary care, almost 60% required a second-line therapy, such as a vacuum device or the administration of alprostadil, with 14 men (15%) necessitating the surgical implantation of a penile prosthesis. Conclusion With a rise in both the prevalence and incidence of ED, primary care physicians have a pivotal role in the screening and initial assessment of patients with ED, with evidence suggesting that a significant proportion can be successfully managed in this setting.
背景与目的 勃起功能障碍(ED)是一种多因素疾病,与基层医疗中常见的许多合并症和风险因素相关。初始治疗包括生活方式改变以及对任何可识别病症的治疗。现有指南推荐对有明确转诊至二级医疗指征的患者进行评估和管理。随着新冠疫情的爆发,包括ED在内的非紧急医疗服务被暂停,导致这些患者的等待名单大幅增加。本研究的目的是回顾在基层和二级医疗中被转诊至专门的ED服务机构的男性患者的管理情况。
材料与方法 对2018年6月至2021年4月间因ED被转诊至二级医疗的男性患者进行回顾性研究,审查基层医疗临床医生是否遵循了英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)和全科医生手册发布的关于评估、初始治疗及转诊的指南。第二个目的是记录这些男性患者在二级医疗专门的ED诊所复查后的结果。
结果 在ED诊所对148名男性患者进行了复查,其中55名男性(37.2%)需要进行本应在基层医疗中实施的适当干预。其中大多数(76.3%)通过磷酸二酯酶抑制剂成功治疗。在二级医疗中接受治疗的患者中,近60%需要二线治疗,如真空装置或前列地尔给药,14名男性(15%)需要手术植入阴茎假体。
结论 随着ED患病率和发病率的上升,基层医疗医生在ED患者筛查和初始评估中起着关键作用,有证据表明很大一部分患者在这种情况下可以得到成功管理。