• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用基于能力的教育评估护理专业学生的研究技能:系统评价与荟萃分析

Utilizing Competency-Based Education to Evaluate the Research Skills of Nursing Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Alkhaledi Norah G, Alabdalhai Sarah A, Awaji Nasima Y, Baker Omar G, Alyasin Ali M, Al Hnaidi Bushra J, Alayed Abdulrahman S, Ashour Yasir O

机构信息

Nursing, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, SAU.

Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jun 17;16(6):e62549. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62549. eCollection 2024 Jun.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.62549
PMID:39022496
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11254333/
Abstract

Exploring and implementing competency-based education approaches to assess research skills are necessary to close the gap between research and practice, promote lifelong learning among future nurses, and improve research literacy. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of competency-based education in improving the assessment of research skills among nursing students. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study (PICOS) eligibility criteria were used to select original studies published between 2017 and 2023. As a first step in the data-handling process, titles and abstracts of all articles retrieved by the search strategy were screened for relevance, and the irrelevant articles were discarded. The screening process was conducted by two authors independently, and the final decisions were made together. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the effectiveness of competency-based education in improving the assessment of research skills among nursing students. Five quantitative studies were appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. The effect size was 0.69 ± 0.35 (P = 0.05), which indicates a high effect on research competency among nursing students who attend courses or training in research matters, after transforming data to correlation coefficient resulting in r = 0.5. The study encourages research literacy among nursing students. Through competency-based learning, students are exposed to a variety of research methodologies, ethical issues, and scientific writing conventions. This exposure enhances their capacity to understand, assess, and apply research evidence, empowering them to become knowledgeable consumers and field contributors. While making evidence-based decisions, nurses with research competencies can actively incorporate the most recent research findings into their clinical practice. Furthermore, nurses with strong research abilities can influence health policy and practice.

摘要

探索并实施基于能力的教育方法来评估研究技能,对于弥合研究与实践之间的差距、促进未来护士的终身学习以及提高研究素养而言是必要的。本研究旨在评估基于能力的教育在提高护理专业学生研究技能评估方面的有效性。按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对文献进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。采用人群、干预措施、对照、结局和研究(PICOS)纳入标准来筛选2017年至2023年发表的原始研究。作为数据处理过程的第一步,对搜索策略检索到的所有文章的标题和摘要进行相关性筛选,剔除不相关的文章。筛选过程由两位作者独立进行,最终决定共同做出。进行荟萃分析以评估基于能力的教育在提高护理专业学生研究技能评估方面的有效性。使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所清单对五项定量研究进行了评估。效应大小为0.69±0.35(P = 0.05),在将数据转换为相关系数(r = 0.5)后,这表明参加研究相关课程或培训的护理专业学生的研究能力受到了很大影响。该研究鼓励护理专业学生具备研究素养。通过基于能力的学习,学生接触到各种研究方法、伦理问题和科学写作规范。这种接触提高了他们理解、评估和应用研究证据的能力,使他们有能力成为知识渊博的消费者和该领域的贡献者。在做出循证决策时,具备研究能力的护士可以积极将最新的研究结果纳入临床实践。此外,具有较强研究能力的护士可以影响卫生政策和实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c188/11254333/ca8978f44a3d/cureus-0016-00000062549-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c188/11254333/263092d3cfe6/cureus-0016-00000062549-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c188/11254333/ca8978f44a3d/cureus-0016-00000062549-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c188/11254333/263092d3cfe6/cureus-0016-00000062549-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c188/11254333/ca8978f44a3d/cureus-0016-00000062549-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
Utilizing Competency-Based Education to Evaluate the Research Skills of Nursing Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.利用基于能力的教育评估护理专业学生的研究技能:系统评价与荟萃分析
Cureus. 2024 Jun 17;16(6):e62549. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62549. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
9
Effectiveness and experience of arts-based pedagogy among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed methods systematic review.本科护理专业学生中基于艺术的教学法的有效性与经验:一项混合方法系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Nov;14(11):139-239. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003188.
10
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.

引用本文的文献

1
"MORAD ESCAPE", a novel research-based escape room approach for evaluating research competencies of health professions students.“MORAD 逃脱”,一种基于研究的新型逃脱密室方法,用于评估卫生专业学生的研究能力。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 21;25(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06781-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of Nursing Research in Saudi Arabia: Implications for Policies and Practice.沙特阿拉伯护理研究的发展:对政策与实践的启示
Nurs Rep. 2023 Sep 9;13(3):1216-1224. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13030104.
2
Nursing Education Practice Update 2022: Competency-Based Education in Nursing.《2022年护理教育实践更新:护理领域基于能力的教育》
SAGE Open Nurs. 2022 Nov 20;8:23779608221140774. doi: 10.1177/23779608221140774. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
3
Development of the Scientific Research Competency Scale for nurses.护士科研能力量表的编制
J Res Nurs. 2021 Nov;26(7):684-700. doi: 10.1177/17449871211020061. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
4
Competency of Academic Nurse Educators.学术护理教育工作者的能力
SAGE Open Nurs. 2020 Nov 2;6:2377960820969389. doi: 10.1177/2377960820969389. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
5
Strategies for sustaining and enhancing nursing students' engagement in academic and clinical settings: a narrative review.维持和增强护生在学术和临床环境中参与度的策略:叙事性综述。
Korean J Med Educ. 2020 Jun;32(2):103-117. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2020.159. Epub 2020 May 28.
6
Development and psychometric testing of the Research Competency Scale for Nursing Students: An instrument design study.护理学专业学生研究能力量表的编制及心理测量学检验:一项工具设计研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Aug;79:198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.05.039. Epub 2019 May 27.
7
Nursing students' attitudes toward research and development within nursing: Does writing a bachelor thesis make a difference?护理专业学生对护理领域研发的态度:撰写本科毕业论文会产生影响吗?
Int J Nurs Pract. 2017 Apr;23(2). doi: 10.1111/ijn.12517. Epub 2017 Jan 16.