Suppr超能文献

对卡普拉罗(2024年)所著《人类社会性的双过程方法:自我保护内化启发式理论的元分析证据》的修正

Correction to "The dual-process approach to human sociality: Meta-analytic evidence for a theory of internalized heuristics for self-preservation" by Capraro (2024).

作者信息

Capraro Valerio

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Milan-Bicocca.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 May;126(5):757. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000406.

Abstract

Reports an error in "The dual-process approach to human sociality: Meta-analytic evidence for a theory of internalized heuristics for self-preservation" by Valerio Capraro (, Advanced Online Publication, Jan 15, 2024, np). The last entry in the Roch et al. (2000) row in Table 3 should appear instead as load decreases taking. All versions of this article have been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2024-43816-001.) Which social decisions are influenced by intuitive processes? Which by deliberative processes? The dual-process approach to human sociality has emerged in the last decades as a vibrant and exciting area of research. Yet a perspective that integrates empirical and theoretical work is lacking. This review and meta-analysis synthesizes the existing literature on the cognitive basis of cooperation, altruism, truth telling, positive and negative reciprocity, and deontology and develops a framework that organizes the experimental regularities. The meta-analytic results suggest that intuition favors a set of heuristics that are related to the instinct for self-preservation: people avoid being harmed, avoid harming others (especially when there is a risk of harm to themselves), and are averse to disadvantageous inequalities. Finally, this article highlights some key research questions to further advance our understanding of the cognitive foundations of human sociality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

报告瓦莱里奥·卡普拉罗(Valerio Capraro)所著的《人类社会性的双过程方法:自我保护内化启发式理论的元分析证据》(, 高级在线出版物,2024年1月15日,np)中的一处错误。表3中罗奇等人(2000年)那一行的最后一项应改为“负载下降时”。本文的所有版本均已更正。(原始文章的以下摘要出现在记录2024 - 43816 - 001中。)哪些社会决策受直觉过程影响?哪些受深思熟虑过程影响?人类社会性的双过程方法在过去几十年中已成为一个充满活力且令人兴奋的研究领域。然而,缺乏一种整合实证和理论工作的视角。本综述和元分析综合了关于合作、利他主义、讲真话、正负互惠以及道义论认知基础的现有文献,并构建了一个组织实验规律的框架。元分析结果表明,直觉倾向于一组与自我保护本能相关的启发式:人们避免受到伤害,避免伤害他人(尤其是当存在对自身伤害的风险时),并且厌恶不利的不平等。最后,本文强调了一些关键研究问题,以进一步推进我们对人类社会性认知基础的理解。(PsycInfo数据库记录 (c) 2024美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验