Am Psychol. 2018 Oct;73(7):947. doi: 10.1037/amp0000389.
Reports an error in "Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report" by Mark Appelbaum, Harris Cooper, Rex B. Kline, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Arthur M. Nezu and Stephen M. Rao (, 2018[Jan], Vol 73[1], 3-25). In the article, there was a citation error. In the "Clinical Trials" subsection in the section, "Reporting Standards for Studies With an Experimental Manipulation" (p. 13), the reference to the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki should be to the 2008 version of the declaration. The sentence should read as follows: From an ethical perspective, the Declaration of Helsinki, which is the set of ethical principles regarding human experimentation developed by the World Medical Association, Inc. (2008), stated that "every clinical trial must be registered in a publicly accessible database before recruitment of the first subject" (Item 19, p. 3). The corrected reference, on p. 25, is also presented in the erratum. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2018-00750-002.) Following a review of extant reporting standards for scientific publication, and reviewing 10 years of experience since publication of the first set of reporting standards by the American Psychological Association (APA; APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards, 2008), the APA Working Group on Quantitative Research Reporting Standards recommended some modifications to the original standards. Examples of modifications include division of hypotheses, analyses, and conclusions into 3 groupings (primary, secondary, and exploratory) and some changes to the section on meta-analysis. Several new modules are included that report standards for observational studies, clinical trials, longitudinal studies, replication studies, and N-of-1 studies. In addition, standards for analytic methods with unique characteristics and output (structural equation modeling and Bayesian analysis) are included. These proposals were accepted by the Publications and Communications Board of APA and supersede the standards included in the 6th edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA, 2010). (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
报告马克·阿佩尔鲍姆、哈里斯·库珀、雷克斯·B·克莱因、埃文·梅奥 - 威尔逊、亚瑟·M·内祖和斯蒂芬·M·拉奥所著的《心理学定量研究的期刊文章报告标准：美国心理学会出版与传播委员会特别工作组报告》（2018年1月，第73卷第1期，第3 - 25页）中的一处错误。在该文章中，存在一处引用错误。在“实验操纵研究的报告标准”部分（第13页）的“临床试验”子部分中，对世界医学协会《赫尔辛基宣言》的引用应指向2008年版的宣言。该句子应如下表述：从伦理角度来看，世界医学协会（2008年）制定的关于人体实验的伦理原则集合《赫尔辛基宣言》指出，“每项临床试验在招募第一名受试者之前必须在公开可访问的数据库中注册”（第3页第19条）。第25页的更正引用也在勘误表中给出。（原始文章的以下摘要出现在记录2018 - 00750 - 002中。）在回顾了现有的科学出版物报告标准，并审视了自美国心理学会（APA；美国心理学会出版与传播委员会期刊文章报告标准工作组，2008年）发布第一套报告标准以来的10年经验后，美国心理学会定量研究报告标准工作组建议对原始标准进行一些修改。修改示例包括将假设、分析和结论分为3类（主要、次要和探索性），以及对元分析部分进行一些更改。纳入了几个新模块，报告观察性研究、临床试验、纵向研究、复制研究和单病例研究的标准。此外，还纳入了具有独特特征和输出的分析方法（结构方程建模和贝叶斯分析）的标准。这些提议被美国心理学会出版与传播委员会接受，并取代了《美国心理学会出版手册》第6版（美国心理学会，2010年）中包含的标准。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2018年美国心理学会，保留所有权利）
