Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 900 NW 17Th Street, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 18;14(1):16638. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67564-y.
The purpose of this study was to examine how demographics, etiology, and clinical examination findings are related to visual outcomes in subjects with open globe injury (OGI) across a large and generalizable sample. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using data collected from the electronic medical records of four tertiary university centers for subjects with OGI presenting from 2018 to 2021. Demographic information, injury mechanisms, clinical exam findings, visual acuity (VA) at presentation and most recent follow-up were recorded. In subjects with bilateral OGIs, only right eyes were included. A modified ocular trauma score (OTS) using presenting VA, the presence of perforating injury, OGI, and afferent pupillary defect was calculated. The risk of subjects' demographic characteristics, ocular trauma etiology, clinical findings and modified OTS on the presence of monocular blindness at follow-up were assessed using univariable and multivariable regression models. 1426 eyes were identified. The mean age was 48.3 years (SD: ± 22.4 years) and the majority of subjects were men (N = 1069, 75.0%). Univariable analysis demonstrated that subjects of Black race were 66% (OR: 1.66 [1.25-2.20]; P < 0.001) more likely to have monocular blindness relative to White race at follow-up. OTS Class 1 was the strongest predictor of blindness (OR: 38.35 [21.33-68.93]; P < 0.001). Based on multivariable analysis, lower OTS category (OTS Class 1 OR: 23.88 [16.44-45.85]; P < 0.001) moderately predicted visual outcomes (R = 0.275, P < 0.001). OGI has many risks of poor visual outcome across patient groups that vary by demographic category, mechanism of injury, and clinical presentation. Our findings validate that a modified OTS remains a strong predictor of visual prognosis following OGI in a large and generalizable sample.
本研究旨在探讨在一个大型且具有代表性的样本中,人口统计学、病因学和临床检查结果如何与开放性眼球损伤(OGI)患者的视力结果相关。对 2018 年至 2021 年期间来自四家三级大学中心的 OGI 患者的电子病历数据进行了回顾性队列分析。记录了人口统计学信息、损伤机制、临床检查结果、就诊时和最近随访时的视力(VA)。在双侧 OGI 患者中,仅纳入右眼。使用就诊时的 VA、穿孔性损伤、OGI 和直接光反射缺失计算改良眼外伤评分(OTS)。使用单变量和多变量回归模型评估患者的人口统计学特征、眼外伤病因、临床发现和改良 OTS 对随访时单眼盲的影响。共纳入 1426 只眼。平均年龄为 48.3 岁(标准差:±22.4 岁),大多数患者为男性(N=1069,75.0%)。单变量分析表明,与白人相比,黑人种族的患者在随访时单眼盲的可能性高 66%(OR:1.66[1.25-2.20];P<0.001)。OTS 1 级是失明的最强预测因子(OR:38.35[21.33-68.93];P<0.001)。基于多变量分析,较低的 OTS 类别(OTS 1 级 OR:23.88[16.44-45.85];P<0.001)可中度预测视力结果(R=0.275,P<0.001)。OGI 在不同人群中存在许多导致视力不良的风险,这些风险因人口统计学类别、损伤机制和临床表现而异。我们的研究结果证实,改良 OTS 仍然是一个大型且具有代表性的 OGI 患者样本中视力预后的有力预测因子。