Hospital Mehiläinen Neo, 20520, Joukahaisenkatu 6Turku, Finland.
Department of Physical Activity and Health, The Paavo Nurmi Centre, The University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Aug;144(8):3491-3501. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05461-9. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
The purpose of this prospective study was to report the outcomes of two different methods in CC and AC reconstruction for the treatment of AC separation using a tendon graft and knot-hiding titanium clavicular implant.
Twenty-seven patients with Rockwood grade III and V acromioclavicular (AC) separations were randomized into two groups. The primary outcome was whether taking the tendon graft through the coracoid risked a fracture. The following were secondary outcomes: follow-up of clavicular wound healing and Nottingham Clavicle score, Constant score, and Simple Shoulder Test results obtained preoperatively and 24 months postoperatively. The anteroposterior radiographic change between the clavicular and coracoid cortexes and the clavicular tunnel diameter was measured postoperatively and 24 months postoperatively. General patient satisfaction with the outcome (poor, fair, good, or excellent) was assessed 2 years postoperatively.
No coracoid fractures were detected. No issues in clavicular wound healing were detected. The mean Nottingham Clavicle score increased from a preoperative mean of 42.42 ± 13.42 to 95.31 ± 14.20 (P < 0.00). The Constant score increased from a preoperative mean of 50.81 ± 17.77 to 96.42 ± 11.51 (P < 0.001). The Simple Shoulder Test score increased from a preoperative mean of 7.50 ± 2.45 to 11.77 ± 1.18 (P < 0.001). The changes were significant. The coracoclavicular distance increased from 11.88 ± 4.00 to 14.19 ± 4.71 mm (P = 0.001), which was significant. The clavicular drill hole diameter increased from 5.5 to a mean of 8.00 ± 0.75 mm. General patient satisfaction was excellent.
There were no significant differences between the two groups. There were no implant related complications in the clavicular wound healing. The results support the notion that good results are achieved by reconstructing both the CC and AC ligaments with a tendon graft.
This clinical trial was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov.
本前瞻性研究旨在报告使用肌腱移植物和隐藏钛锁骨植入物治疗 Rockwood III 级和 V 级肩锁关节(AC)分离的两种不同 CC 和 AC 重建方法的结果。
27 例 Rockwood III 级和 V 级肩锁关节分离患者随机分为两组。主要结果是通过喙突取肌腱移植物是否有骨折风险。次要结果包括锁骨伤口愈合和诺丁汉锁骨评分、Constant 评分、术前和术后 24 个月的简单肩部测试结果的随访。术后和术后 24 个月测量锁骨和喙突皮质之间的前后位 X 线变化以及锁骨隧道直径。术后 2 年评估患者对结果的总体满意度(差、一般、好、优)。
未发现喙突骨折。未发现锁骨伤口愈合问题。诺丁汉锁骨评分从术前平均 42.42±13.42 增加到术后 95.31±14.20(P<0.00)。Constant 评分从术前平均 50.81±17.77 增加到术后 96.42±11.51(P<0.001)。简单肩部测试评分从术前平均 7.50±2.45 增加到术后 11.77±1.18(P<0.001)。这些变化具有统计学意义。喙锁间距从 11.88±4.00 增加到 14.19±4.71mm(P=0.001),差异有统计学意义。锁骨钻孔直径从 5.5 增加到平均 8.00±0.75mm。患者总体满意度为优。
两组之间无显著差异。锁骨伤口愈合无植入物相关并发症。结果支持用肌腱移植物重建 CC 和 AC 韧带可获得良好效果的观点。
本临床试验在 Clinicaltrials.gov 上注册。