• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下颌骨双根管和三根管的发生率及解剖学特征:计算机断层扫描分析。

Prevalence and Anatomical Characteristics of Bifid and Trifid Mandibular Canals: A Computer Tomography Analysis.

出版信息

Oral Health Prev Dent. 2024 Jul 19;22:301-308. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b5573959.

DOI:10.3290/j.ohpd.b5573959
PMID:39028000
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11619853/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the prevalence and configuration of bifid (BMC) and trifid (TMC) mandibular canals using computed tomography (CT), describing the anatomical characteristics of the accessory canals, especially of the retromolar type.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CT scans of 123 patients were analysed. BMCs were identified and the patterns of bifurcation were classified, including trifid canals. The width of accessory canals was measured. Retromolar canals were further classified according to their course and morphology, while their position and width were evaluated using linear measurements on CT images.

RESULTS

The majority of patients (53.6%) presented at least one BMC or TMC. 36.2% of mandibular canals were bifid, while 4.5% were trifid. The forward canals (12.6%) and retromolar canals (10.2%) were the most common among BMCs. In relation to the retromolar canals, 60% were vertical and 40% curved, with a mean width of 1.03 ± 0.28mm.

CONCLUSION

BMCs and TMCs are common 3D radiographic findings, so that they should be considered as anatomical variations, not anomalies. Preoperative CT or CBCT evaluation should aid in identifying these variations and analysing their position and course in surgical planning.

摘要

目的

利用计算机断层扫描(CT)评估下颌骨双(BMC)和三叉(TMC)管的发生率和形态,描述副根管的解剖特征,特别是磨牙后类型。

材料和方法

分析了 123 名患者的 CT 扫描。确定 BMC 并对分叉模式进行分类,包括三叉管。测量副根管的宽度。根据其行程和形态进一步对磨牙后管进行分类,同时使用 CT 图像上的线性测量评估其位置和宽度。

结果

大多数患者(53.6%)至少有一个 BMC 或 TMC。36.2%的下颌管是双管,而 4.5%是三叉管。前管(12.6%)和磨牙后管(10.2%)是 BMC 中最常见的。关于磨牙后管,60%为垂直,40%为弯曲,平均宽度为 1.03±0.28mm。

结论

BMC 和 TMC 是常见的 3D 射线照相发现,因此应将其视为解剖变异,而不是异常。术前 CT 或 CBCT 评估有助于识别这些变异,并分析其在手术计划中的位置和行程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d11/11619853/3430df4f928b/ohpd-22-301-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d11/11619853/0244b60513a6/ohpd-22-301-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d11/11619853/3b4736ca6618/ohpd-22-301-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d11/11619853/a6fe37f19be8/ohpd-22-301-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d11/11619853/ddf5e1bd9cf2/ohpd-22-301-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d11/11619853/3430df4f928b/ohpd-22-301-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d11/11619853/0244b60513a6/ohpd-22-301-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d11/11619853/3b4736ca6618/ohpd-22-301-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d11/11619853/a6fe37f19be8/ohpd-22-301-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d11/11619853/ddf5e1bd9cf2/ohpd-22-301-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d11/11619853/3430df4f928b/ohpd-22-301-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Prevalence and Anatomical Characteristics of Bifid and Trifid Mandibular Canals: A Computer Tomography Analysis.下颌骨双根管和三根管的发生率及解剖学特征:计算机断层扫描分析。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2024 Jul 19;22:301-308. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b5573959.
2
Prevalence of bifid and trifid mandibular canals with unusual patterns of nerve branching using cone beam computed tomography.应用锥形束 CT 研究具有异常神经分支模式的分叉和三分叉下颌管的流行情况。
Odontology. 2022 Jan;110(1):203-211. doi: 10.1007/s10266-021-00638-9. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
3
Prevalence and topography of bifid and trifid mandibular canal in Turkish Western Anatolia Population: evaluation of the inferior alveolar canal with CBCT.土耳其安纳托利亚西部人群中下颌管的双叉和三叉分布及形态:应用 CBCT 评估下牙槽管。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2024 Oct;46(10):1663-1672. doi: 10.1007/s00276-024-03460-4. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
4
What are the retromolar and bifid/trifid mandibular canals as seen on cone-beam computed tomography? Revisiting classic gross anatomy of the inferior alveolar nerve and correcting terminology.在上颌窦内提升术中上颌窦黏膜穿孔的相关因素分析
Surg Radiol Anat. 2022 Jan;44(1):147-156. doi: 10.1007/s00276-021-02862-y. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
5
Assessment of bifid and trifid mandibular canals using cone-beam computed tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估下颌双管和三管。
Imaging Sci Dent. 2014 Sep;44(3):229-36. doi: 10.5624/isd.2014.44.3.229. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
6
Bifid variations of the mandibular canal: cone beam computed tomography evaluation of 1000 Northern Chinese patients.下颌管的双歧变异:1000 例中国北方患者的锥形束 CT 评估。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018 Nov;126(5):e271-e278. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2018.06.008. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
7
Bifid mandibular canals: CBCT assessment and macroscopic observation.下颌骨双根管:CBCT 评估和宏观观察。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2020 Sep;42(9):1073-1079. doi: 10.1007/s00276-020-02489-5. Epub 2020 May 12.
8
Configuration and corticalization of the mandibular bifid canal in a Taiwanese adult population: a computed tomography study.台湾成年人群下颌骨双管的形态及皮质化程度:一项计算机断层扫描研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Jul-Aug;29(4):893-7. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3435.
9
Evaluation of bifid mandibular canals with cone-beam computed tomography in a Turkish adult population: a retrospective study.在土耳其成年人群中使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估双下颌管:一项回顾性研究。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2011 Aug;33(6):501-7. doi: 10.1007/s00276-010-0761-y. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
10
Prevalence and morphometric analysis of retromolar canals and foramina: a cone-beam computed tomography study.磨牙后管和孔的患病率及形态计量学分析:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Mar 28;29(1):75. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01373-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-dimensional analysis of natural healing of mandibular bone cavities after cyst enucleation.囊肿摘除术后下颌骨腔自然愈合的三维分析
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Feb 5;29(2):116. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06162-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of Bifid Mandibular Canal: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.双下颌管的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Plast Surg. 2023;12(2):11-19. doi: 10.52547/wjps.12.2.11.
2
The Clinical Relevance of the Lingual Branch in Ridge Augmentation of the Posterior Mandible: A Pilot Cadaver Study.舌侧支在下颌后牙槽嵴增高中的临床相关性:一项初步的尸体研究。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2024 Mar 20;44(2):213-218. doi: 10.11607/prd.6458.
3
Bifid Mandibular Canal: A Proportional Meta-Analysis of Computed Tomography Studies.
双下颌管:计算机断层扫描研究的比例元分析
Int J Dent. 2023 Mar 6;2023:9939076. doi: 10.1155/2023/9939076. eCollection 2023.
4
Prevalence of bifid and trifid mandibular canals with unusual patterns of nerve branching using cone beam computed tomography.应用锥形束 CT 研究具有异常神经分支模式的分叉和三分叉下颌管的流行情况。
Odontology. 2022 Jan;110(1):203-211. doi: 10.1007/s10266-021-00638-9. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
5
Anatomical variations of the mandibular canal and their clinical implications in dental practice: a literature review.下颌管的解剖变异及其在口腔临床实践中的临床意义:文献综述。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2021 Aug;43(8):1259-1272. doi: 10.1007/s00276-021-02708-7. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
6
Coronectomy of mandibular third molars: a systematic literature review and case studies.下颌第三磨牙冠切除术:系统文献回顾和病例研究。
Aust Dent J. 2021 Jun;66(2):136-149. doi: 10.1111/adj.12825. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
7
The bifid mandibular canal in three-dimensional radiography: morphologic and quantitative characteristics.下颌骨双管在三维 X 光片下的形态和定量特征。
Swiss Dent J. 2021 Jan 11;131(1):10-28. doi: 10.61872/sdj-2021-01-01. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
8
Assessing the Prevalence and Morphological Characteristics of Bifid Mandibular Canal Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估下颌管分叉的患病率和形态特征——一项回顾性横断面研究。
J Clin Imaging Sci. 2020 May 23;10:30. doi: 10.25259/JCIS_67_2019. eCollection 2020.
9
Assessment of the temporal crest canal using cone-beam computed tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估颞嵴管。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Feb;58(2):199-202. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
10
Bifid Mandibular Canal: A Case Review and Retrospective Review of CBCTs.双下颌管:病例回顾与 CBCT 的回顾性研究。
Implant Dent. 2018 Dec;27(6):682-686. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000819.