Suppr超能文献

了解行为减肥计划中支持伙伴的选择。

Understanding the selection of support partners in a behavioral weight loss program.

作者信息

Crane Nicole T, Miller Nicole A, Arigo Danielle, Butryn Meghan L

机构信息

Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Psychology, Rowan University, Glassboro, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Health. 2024 Jul 19:1-18. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2024.2381238.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Engaging a support partner during behavioral weight loss (BWL) programs can improve outcomes. However, little information is available about those selected as support partners. The study aimed to (1) characterize support partners and qualities of the relationship, (2) assess differences in relationship dynamics across relationship types, and (3) assess differences in supportive relationships by participant gender.

METHODS AND MEASURES

Upon entering a 24-month BWL program, participants ( = 323) nominated a support person from their existing social networks. Participants completed self-report measures at baseline, including the Working Alliance Inventory and study-specific measures assessing characteristics of the support person and comfort in communicating with them.

RESULTS

Spouse/partners were chosen by 43.3% of all participants. Among married participants, 80.9% of men and 53.8% of women chose their spouse/partner. Working alliance was lower when the support partner was a spouse/partner versus a friend ( < 0.05,  = -0.19). Comfort talking about exercise with a support partner was higher than talking about eating or weight ( < 0.001, = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A variety of friends and family can be selected as support partners during BWL. Programs should attend to the unique needs of men versus women when identifying sources of support.

摘要

目的

在行为减肥(BWL)项目中引入支持伙伴可以改善结果。然而,关于被选为支持伙伴的人的信息却很少。该研究旨在:(1)描述支持伙伴及其关系的特质;(2)评估不同关系类型中关系动态的差异;(3)评估参与者性别在支持性关系中的差异。

方法与测量

在进入为期24个月的BWL项目时,参与者(n = 323)从他们现有的社交网络中提名一名支持人员。参与者在基线时完成自我报告测量,包括工作联盟量表以及评估支持人员特征和与他们沟通舒适度的特定研究测量。

结果

43.3%的参与者选择了配偶/伴侣。在已婚参与者中,80.9%的男性和53.8%的女性选择了他们的配偶/伴侣。当支持伙伴是配偶/伴侣而非朋友时,工作联盟较低(P < 0.05,r = -0.19)。与支持伙伴谈论锻炼的舒适度高于谈论饮食或体重(P < 0.001,r = 0.05)。

结论

在BWL期间,可以选择各种朋友和家人作为支持伙伴。在确定支持来源时,项目应关注男性和女性的独特需求。

相似文献

5
Dyadic Dynamics in a Randomized Weight Loss Intervention.随机体重减轻干预中的二元动力学
Ann Behav Med. 2016 Aug;50(4):506-15. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9778-8.
10
Impact of social connectedness on weight loss outcomes in an online program.社会联结对在线项目减肥效果的影响。
J Behav Med. 2024 Feb;47(1):144-152. doi: 10.1007/s10865-023-00447-1. Epub 2023 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验