• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

葡萄牙 III 期临床试验中的知情同意质量:参与者的观点。

Quality of Informed Consent in Phase III Clinical Trials in Portugal: The Participants' Perspective.

机构信息

Centre for Health Studies and Research. Universidade de Coimbra. Coimbra. Portugal.

出版信息

Acta Med Port. 2024 Sep 2;37(9):601-608. doi: 10.20344/amp.20570. Epub 2024 Jul 19.

DOI:10.20344/amp.20570
PMID:39028264
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Some studies show that participants do not always fully understand the informed consent form (ICF), which is one of the reasons for dropouts. This study aimed to adapt the Quality of Informed Consent (QuIC) questionnaire into a valid instrument to be applied to the Portuguese population and to measure its reliability and validity in the Portuguese population, by applying it to a sample of participants in controlled trials.

METHODS

The QuIC questionnaire was developed to assess the quality of informed consent in clinical trials and consists of two parts, addressing both the objective (part A) and the subjective (part B) understanding. After being translated and validated into Portuguese, it was implemented in 100 cardiac participants of phase III clinical trials in a University Hospital Center.

RESULTS

The QuIC-PT questionnaire showed excellent stability over time and good validity. All patients evaluated their participation and their health positively and recognized the main purpose of the clinical trial. Almost all participants understood their role in helping future patients and the purpose of the trial and realized that, by signing the ICF, they were participating in a clinical trial. However, none of them knew that their experimental treatment was not proven to be the best alternative for their condition.

CONCLUSION

The QuIC-PT questionnaire seems to be a valid and useful instrument to evaluate the participants' understanding of the ICF. In this study, we found that some concepts, like 'study protocol' or 'randomization', were not well understood by participants when signing the ICF, especially by participants with lower education levels. They also believed that the experimental intervention would solve their health condition. Greater awareness about the importance of the informed consent process and ICF is necessary so that participants can fully understand the protocol, especially the risks involved, and their rights as participants.

摘要

简介

一些研究表明,参与者并不总是完全理解知情同意书(ICF),这也是导致脱落的原因之一。本研究旨在将《知情同意质量问卷》(QuIC)改编为一种适用于葡萄牙人群的有效工具,并在葡萄牙人群中应用该问卷测量其信度和效度,将其应用于临床试验的参与者样本中。

方法

QuIC 问卷用于评估临床试验中的知情同意质量,它由两部分组成,分别针对客观(A 部分)和主观(B 部分)理解。在翻译成葡萄牙语并经过验证后,它被应用于一所大学医院中心的 100 名 III 期临床试验的心脏病患者中。

结果

QuIC-PT 问卷在时间上表现出极好的稳定性和良好的有效性。所有患者对自己的参与和健康状况评价都很积极,认识到临床试验的主要目的。几乎所有的参与者都理解他们在帮助未来患者和临床试验中的作用,并意识到通过签署 ICF,他们正在参与临床试验。然而,他们都不知道他们的实验性治疗方法尚未被证明是他们病情的最佳选择。

结论

QuIC-PT 问卷似乎是一种评估参与者对 ICF 理解的有效且有用的工具。在这项研究中,我们发现一些概念,如“研究方案”或“随机化”,在参与者签署 ICF 时理解得并不透彻,尤其是教育程度较低的参与者。他们还认为实验性干预措施将解决他们的健康状况。有必要提高人们对知情同意过程和 ICF 的重要性的认识,以便参与者能够充分理解方案,特别是涉及的风险,以及他们作为参与者的权利。

相似文献

1
Quality of Informed Consent in Phase III Clinical Trials in Portugal: The Participants' Perspective.葡萄牙 III 期临床试验中的知情同意质量:参与者的观点。
Acta Med Port. 2024 Sep 2;37(9):601-608. doi: 10.20344/amp.20570. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
2
Improved participants' understanding of research information in real settings using the SIDCER informed consent form: a randomized-controlled informed consent study nested with eight clinical trials.使用SIDCER知情同意书提高参与者在实际环境中对研究信息的理解:一项嵌套于八项临床试验的随机对照知情同意研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Feb;73(2):141-149. doi: 10.1007/s00228-016-2159-1. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
3
Quality of informed consent: a new measure of understanding among research subjects.知情同意的质量:研究对象理解程度的一种新度量
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Jan 17;93(2):139-47. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.2.139.
4
Effectiveness of Telehealth Versus In-Person Informed Consent: Randomized Study of Comprehension and Decision-Making.远程医疗与亲自进行知情同意的效果:关于理解与决策的随机研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 5;27:e63473. doi: 10.2196/63473.
5
Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials in India: A cross-sectional survey.印度癌症临床试验中知情同意的质量:一项横断面调查。
Natl Med J India. 2018 Nov-Dec;31(6):334-338. doi: 10.4103/0970-258X.262900.
6
An enhanced participant information leaflet and multimedia intervention to improve the quality of informed consent to a randomised clinical trial enrolling people living with HIV and obesity: a protocol for a Study Within A Trial (SWAT).一项增强版的知情同意书和多媒体干预措施,以提高招募肥胖的 HIV 感染者参与随机临床试验的知情同意书质量:一项嵌套式临床试验研究(SWAT)的方案。
Trials. 2022 Jan 17;23(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05979-y.
7
Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of enhanced informed consent compared to standard informed consent to improve patient understanding of early phase oncology clinical trials (CONSENT).一项随机对照试验的研究方案,旨在比较增强型知情同意与标准知情同意,以提高患者对早期肿瘤临床试验的理解(CONSENT)。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 6;11(9):e049217. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049217.
8
Telemedicine Provides Noninferior Research Informed Consent for Remote Study Enrollment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.远程医疗为远程研究入组提供非劣效性研究知情同意:一项随机对照试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;23(7):759-65. doi: 10.1111/acem.12966. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
9
Improved participants' understanding in a healthy volunteer study using the SIDCER informed consent form: a randomized-controlled study.在一项使用SIDCER知情同意书的健康志愿者研究中提高参与者的理解:一项随机对照研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Apr;72(4):413-21. doi: 10.1007/s00228-015-2000-2. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
10
A booklet on participants' rights to improve consent for clinical research: a randomized trial.提高临床研究中患者同意书质量的患者权利小册子: 一项随机试验。
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047023. Epub 2012 Oct 19.