School of Dentistry, Federal University de Minas Gerais, Antônio Carlos Avenue 6627 Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil.
Department of Child and Adolescent Oral Health, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Antônio Carlos Avenue 6627 Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil.
Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Jul 19;39(1):186. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04135-7.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current scientific evidence on the effectiveness of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) as an adjunctive treatment to mechanical debridement in the treatment of peri-implantitis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses was followed. A protocol was registered in the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO #CRD42022361684). The search was carried out in seven databases, with no restrictions regarding language or year of publication. Our work included studies that compared clinical periodontal parameters between individuals treated with mechanical debridement associated with aPDT and a control group of patients who had undergone mechanical debridement alone. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment (RoB 2.0) were performed by two review authors. Meta-analysis was performed. The mean difference (MD) and a 95% confidence interval (CI) were provided. Four hundred and seven-four studies were identified, of which five studies were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated that aPDT adjunctive to mechanical debridement in subjects with peri-implantitis resulted in greater reduction in probing depth 3 months after treatment than among subjects receiving treatment with mechanical debridement. Most of the included studies exhibit a low risk of bias. Adjunctive aPDT to mechanical debridement contributes to the improvement of peri-implant clinical parameters in individuals with peri-implantitis, in particular probing depth.
本研究旨在评估抗菌光动力疗法(aPDT)作为机械清创术辅助治疗在治疗种植体周围炎中的有效性的现有科学证据。本研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目。该方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册中心(PROSPERO #CRD42022361684)中注册。该研究在七个数据库中进行了检索,对语言和出版年份没有限制。我们的研究包括比较了接受机械清创术联合 aPDT 治疗的个体与仅接受机械清创术治疗的对照组患者之间临床牙周参数的研究。由两位综述作者进行了研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估(RoB 2.0)。进行了荟萃分析。提供了平均值差异(MD)和 95%置信区间(CI)。共确定了 474 项研究,其中有 5 项研究被纳入。荟萃分析表明,与接受机械清创术治疗的患者相比,在患有种植体周围炎的患者中,aPDT 辅助机械清创术在治疗后 3 个月时可更大程度地降低探诊深度。大多数纳入的研究具有低偏倚风险。机械清创术联合 aPDT 有助于改善种植体周围炎患者的种植体周围临床参数,特别是探诊深度。