• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子健康干预措施的软件测试:现有实践和迭代策略的未来。

Software Testing of eHealth Interventions: Existing Practices and the Future of an Iterative Strategy.

机构信息

Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Nurs. 2024 Jul 19;7:e56585. doi: 10.2196/56585.

DOI:10.2196/56585
PMID:39028552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11297368/
Abstract

eHealth interventions are becoming a part of standard care, with software solutions increasingly created for patients and health care providers. Testing of eHealth software is important to ensure that the software realizes its goals. Software testing, which is comprised of alpha and beta testing, is critical to establish the effectiveness and usability of the software. In this viewpoint, we explore existing practices for testing software in health care settings. We scanned the literature using search terms related to eHealth software testing (eg, "health alpha testing," "eHealth testing," and "health app usability") to identify practices for testing eHealth software. We could not identify a single standard framework for software testing in health care settings; some articles reported frameworks, while others reported none. In addition, some authors misidentified alpha testing as beta testing and vice versa. There were several different objectives (ie, testing for safety, reliability, or usability) and methods of testing (eg, questionnaires, interviews) reported. Implementation of an iterative strategy in testing can introduce flexible and rapid changes when developing eHealth software. Further investigation into the best approach for software testing in health care settings would aid the development of effective and useful eHealth software, particularly for novice eHealth software developers.

摘要

电子健康干预措施正在成为标准护理的一部分,越来越多的软件解决方案正被开发用于患者和医疗保健提供者。测试电子健康软件对于确保软件实现其目标非常重要。软件测试由 alpha 和 beta 测试组成,对于确定软件的有效性和可用性至关重要。在这个观点中,我们探讨了在医疗保健环境中测试软件的现有实践。我们使用与电子健康软件测试相关的搜索词(例如“健康 alpha 测试”、“电子健康测试”和“健康应用程序可用性”)扫描文献,以确定测试电子健康软件的实践。我们无法在医疗保健环境中确定一个单一的软件测试标准框架;有些文章报告了框架,而有些则没有。此外,一些作者错误地将 alpha 测试识别为 beta 测试,反之亦然。报告了几种不同的测试目标(即测试安全性、可靠性或可用性)和测试方法(例如,问卷、访谈)。在测试中实施迭代策略可以在开发电子健康软件时引入灵活和快速的更改。进一步研究医疗保健环境中软件测试的最佳方法将有助于开发有效和有用的电子健康软件,特别是对于新手电子健康软件开发者。

相似文献

1
Software Testing of eHealth Interventions: Existing Practices and the Future of an Iterative Strategy.电子健康干预措施的软件测试:现有实践和迭代策略的未来。
JMIR Nurs. 2024 Jul 19;7:e56585. doi: 10.2196/56585.
2
Methods of usability testing in the development of eHealth applications: A scoping review.电子健康应用程序开发中的可用性测试方法:范围综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jun;126:95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Mar 31.
3
Agile eHealth Usability Evaluation: A Triangulative Approach to Promoting the Usability of eHealth Systems.敏捷式电子健康可用性评估:促进电子健康系统可用性的三角评估方法。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Apr 26;313:234-240. doi: 10.3233/SHTI240043.
4
Psychometric Properties of Patient-Facing eHealth Evaluation Measures: Systematic Review and Analysis.面向患者的电子健康评估指标的心理测量特性:系统评价与分析
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 11;19(10):e346. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7638.
5
Interoperability frameworks linking mHealth applications to electronic record systems.将移动医疗应用程序与电子病历系统相连接的互操作性框架。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 13;21(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06473-6.
6
A "No-Code" App Design Platform for Mobile Health Research: Development and Usability Study.用于移动健康研究的“无代码”应用程序设计平台:开发与可用性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Aug 18;6(8):e38737. doi: 10.2196/38737.
7
Agile, Easily Applicable, and Useful eHealth Usability Evaluations: Systematic Review and Expert-Validation.敏捷、易于应用且有用的电子健康可用性评估:系统评价和专家验证。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Jan;13(1):67-79. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740919. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
8
A User-Centered Approach to an Evidence-Based Electronic Health Pain Management Intervention for People With Chronic Pain: Design and Development of EPIO.一种以用户为中心的针对慢性疼痛患者的循证电子健康疼痛管理干预方法:EPIO的设计与开发
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jan 21;22(1):e15889. doi: 10.2196/15889.
9
A Review of Usability Evaluation Methods and Their Use for Testing eHealth HIV Interventions.可用性评估方法综述及其在电子健康 HIV 干预措施测试中的应用。
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2020 Jun;17(3):203-218. doi: 10.1007/s11904-020-00493-3.
10
A Stress Management App Intervention for Cancer Survivors: Design, Development, and Usability Testing.一项针对癌症幸存者的压力管理应用程序干预措施:设计、开发与可用性测试。
JMIR Form Res. 2018 Sep 6;2(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/formative.9954.

引用本文的文献

1
2024: A Year of Nursing Informatics Research in Review.2024年护理信息学研究综述之年。
JMIR Nurs. 2025 May 7;8:e74345. doi: 10.2196/74345.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of Alberta Family Integrated Care on infant length of stay in level II neonatal intensive care units: a cluster randomized controlled trial.艾伯塔家庭综合护理对二级新生儿重症监护病房婴儿住院时间的影响:一项整群随机对照试验
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Nov 28;20(1):535. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02438-6.
2
Ethical issues related to eHealth: An integrative review.电子健康相关的伦理问题:综合述评
Nurs Ethics. 2021 Mar;28(2):253-271. doi: 10.1177/0969733020945765. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
3
Agile research to complement agile development: a proposal for an mHealth research lifecycle.敏捷研究以补充敏捷开发:移动健康研究生命周期的一项提议。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Sep 13;1:46. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0053-1. eCollection 2018.
4
Methods of usability testing in the development of eHealth applications: A scoping review.电子健康应用程序开发中的可用性测试方法:范围综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jun;126:95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Mar 31.
5
A multi-level usability evaluation of mobile health applications: A case study.移动医疗应用程序的多层次可用性评估:案例研究。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Oct;86:79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
6
The importance of ethical aspects when implementing eHealth services in healthcare: A discussion paper.实施电子健康服务时伦理方面的重要性:讨论文件。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 May;74(5):1043-1050. doi: 10.1111/jan.13493. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
7
Alpha test results for a Housing First eLearning strategy: the value of multiple qualitative methods for intervention design.住房优先电子学习策略的阿尔法测试结果:多种定性方法对干预设计的价值。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Oct 31;3:46. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0187-y. eCollection 2017.
8
Mobile Application to Promote Adherence to Oral Chemotherapy and Symptom Management: A Protocol for Design and Development.促进口服化疗依从性和症状管理的移动应用程序:设计与开发方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Apr 20;6(4):e62. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6198.
9
Embedding Patient Education in Mobile Platform for Patients With Heart Failure: Theory-Based Development and Beta Testing.将患者教育嵌入心力衰竭患者移动平台:基于理论的开发与测试
Comput Inform Nurs. 2016 Feb;34(2):92-8. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000216.
10
Development testing of mobile health interventions for cancer patient self-management: A review.用于癌症患者自我管理的移动健康干预措施的开发测试:一项综述。
Health Informatics J. 2016 Sep;22(3):633-50. doi: 10.1177/1460458215577994. Epub 2015 Apr 27.