PEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, Saint Gilles, F-35590, France.
Institut Agro, INRAE, SAS, Rennes, F-35000, France.
J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae203.
The traditional approach to formulating pig diets is based only on minimizing cost while meeting nutritional requirements and thus does not consider the environmental impacts associated with producing feed ingredients. To reduce the overall environmental impact of pork production, feed ingredients can be considered to formulate environmentally friendly diets. However, their potential effects on pig performance could decrease environmental benefits at the farm gate. The objective of this study was to quantify the effects of such eco-friendly pig diets on nitrogen (N) and energy (E) balances, the components of heat production (HP), and the performance of growing pigs. Digestibility coefficients of dry matter (84.5% vs. 88.2%, P < 0.01) and N (80.4% vs. 86.3%, P < 0.01) were significantly lower for the eco-friendly diet than the Control-diet (a commercial diet used in France). N excretion in feces was significantly higher for the group of pigs fed the eco-friendly diet than for the group fed the Control-diet (9.8 vs. 6.9 g/d, respectively, P = 0.01), while the N retention tended to be lower (27.8 vs. 30.3 g/d, respectively; P = 0.06). The metabolizable E:digestible E ratio did not differ between diets, but total HP was significantly lower for the eco-friendly diet group than for the Control-diet group (1,340 vs. 1,388 kJ/kg body weight0.60/d, respectively, P = 0.03). Using feed ingredients with lower environmental impacts, such as locally produced protein or co-products from wheat processing, is an effective way to decrease the environmental impacts of pig production. However, the nutritional composition of these eco-friendly ingredients could be overestimated, in particular the true digestibility of amino acids. This indicates the need to better estimate and consider the true digestibility of eco-friendly diets to decrease environmental impacts of livestock production without decreasing animal performance.
传统的猪饲料配方方法仅基于最小化成本,同时满足营养需求,因此不考虑生产饲料成分相关的环境影响。为了降低猪肉生产的整体环境影响,可以考虑使用饲料成分来配制环保型日粮。然而,它们对猪生产性能的潜在影响可能会降低农场门口的环境效益。本研究的目的是量化这些环保型猪日粮对氮 (N) 和能量 (E) 平衡、产热 (HP) 组成以及生长猪性能的影响。与对照日粮(法国常用的商业日粮)相比,环保日粮的干物质(84.5%对 88.2%,P<0.01)和 N(80.4%对 86.3%,P<0.01)消化率显著降低。与对照组相比,饲喂环保日粮的猪粪便中 N 排泄量显著增加(分别为 9.8 和 6.9 g/d,P=0.01),而 N 保留量趋于降低(分别为 27.8 和 30.3 g/d,P=0.06)。两种日粮的可代谢 E:可消化 E 比值无差异,但环保日粮组的总 HP 显著低于对照组(分别为 1,340 和 1,388 kJ/kg 体重 0.60/d,P=0.03)。使用环境影响较小的饲料成分,如当地生产的蛋白质或小麦加工的副产品,是降低猪生产环境影响的有效方法。然而,这些环保成分的营养成分可能被高估,特别是氨基酸的真实消化率。这表明需要更好地估计和考虑环保日粮的真实消化率,以在不降低动物生产性能的情况下降低畜牧业的环境影响。