Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy.
School of Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy.
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Jul 20;47(1):342. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02563-1.
The use of microelectrode recording (MER) during deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson Disease is controversial. Furthermore, in asleep DBS anesthesia can impair the ability to record single-cell electric activity.The purpose of this study was to describe our surgical and anesthesiologic protocol for MER assessment during asleep subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS and to put our findings in the context of a systematic review of the literature. Sixty-three STN electrodes were implanted in 32 patients under general anesthesia. A frameless technique using O-Arm scanning was adopted in all cases. Total intravenous anesthesia, monitored with bispectral index, was administered using a target controlled infusion of both propofol and remifentanil. A systematic review of the literature with metanalysis on MER in asleep vs awake STN DBS for Parkinson Disease was performed. In our series, MER could be reliably recorded in all cases, impacting profoundly on electrode positioning: the final position was located within 2 mm from the planned target only in 42.9% cases. Depth modification > 2 mm was necessary in 21 cases (33.3%), while in 15 cases (23.8%) a different track was used. At 1-year follow-up we observed a significant reduction in LEDD, UPDRS Part III score off-medications, and UPDRS Part III score on medications, as compared to baseline. The systematic review of the literature yielded 23 papers; adding the cases here reported, overall 1258 asleep DBS cases using MER are described. This technique was safe and effective: metanalysis showed similar, if not better, outcome of asleep vs awake patients operated using MER. MER are a useful and reliable tool during asleep STN DBS, leading to a fine tuning of electrode position in the majority of cases. Collaboration between neurosurgeon, neurophysiologist and neuroanesthesiologist is crucial, since slight modifications of sedation level can impact profoundly on MER reliability.
在帕金森病的深部脑刺激 (DBS) 中使用微电极记录 (MER) 存在争议。此外,在睡眠状态下进行 DBS 麻醉会损害记录单细胞电活动的能力。本研究的目的是描述我们在睡眠状态下进行 SUBTHALAMIC 核 (STN) DBS 时进行 MER 评估的手术和麻醉方案,并将我们的发现置于文献系统评价的背景下。在 32 名患者中,在全身麻醉下植入了 63 个 STN 电极。在所有情况下均采用使用 O-Arm 扫描的无框架技术。使用丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼的靶控输注,给予总静脉麻醉,并通过双谱指数进行监测。对在睡眠状态下与清醒状态下进行帕金森病 STN DBS 的 MER 进行了文献系统评价和荟萃分析。在我们的系列中,MER 可以在所有病例中可靠地记录下来,这对电极定位产生了深远的影响:只有 42.9%的病例最终位置位于计划靶标内 2mm 内。21 例(33.3%)需要深度修改>2mm,15 例(23.8%)使用不同的轨迹。在 1 年的随访中,与基线相比,我们观察到 LEDD、UPDRS 第 III 部分停药评分和 UPDRS 第 III 部分服药评分显著降低。文献系统评价得出了 23 篇论文;加上这里报告的病例,总共描述了 1258 例使用 MER 的睡眠 DBS 病例。该技术安全有效:荟萃分析显示,使用 MER 进行手术的睡眠患者与清醒患者的结果相似,如果不是更好的话。MER 是睡眠状态下 STN DBS 的有用且可靠的工具,可使大多数情况下电极位置得到微调。神经外科医生、神经生理学家和神经麻醉师之间的合作至关重要,因为镇静水平的微小变化会对 MER 的可靠性产生深远影响。