Department of Obstetrical, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Department of Obstetrical, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Technol Health Care. 2024;32(6):4031-4040. doi: 10.3233/THC-231752.
Electronic foetal monitoring (EFM), a method to monitor foetal intrauterine conditions and foetal reserve capacity, is the most extensively used intrauterine monitoring technology in obstetrics.
This study aims to compare the Thoth wearable foetal electrocardiogram (foetal ECG [FECG]) monitoring system with a traditional Doppler foetal heart monitoring system before labour to investigate their respective values in clinical application.
A total of 393 pregnant women admitted to our hospital between 2020 and 2022 participated in this study. They were recruited using the convenience sampling method. We employed a paired design to assess the confusion rate, trend overlap, and foetal heart rate/ECG monitoring consistency, whereas a completely randomised design was used to measure pregnancy outcome indicators. The participants were divided into two groups using a random number table: the Thoth group (n= 196) and the traditional Doppler group (n= 197). Each group was monitored using the corresponding system.
The Thoth monitor demonstrated a lower confusion rate compared with the traditional Doppler monitor (0.25% vs 2.04%; χ2= 5.508, P= 0.019). The trend overlap in foetal heart rates was consistently 100%, with 91.2% of readings showing a consistency rate of ⩾ 95%. Additionally, the Thoth monitor recorded a higher cumulative interruption time in the foetal heart rate curve (12.13 ± 2.22 vs 21.02 ± 2.34; t= 18.471, P< 0.001) and more abnormal ECGs (21.21 ± 4.32 vs 18.21 ± 2.91; t= 7.582, P< 0.001) than the traditional Doppler system.
The Thoth wearable FECG monitor offers several advantages over the traditional Doppler foetal heart monitoring system. These include a reduced confusion rate, more accurate data collection, a lower rate of clinical misjudgement, reduced workload for medical staff, and enhanced comfort during vaginal delivery. The rates of emergency caesarean sections and neonatal asphyxia in the Thoth group were marginally lower than those in the Doppler group, which may be attributed to issues such as ECG disconnection or interference from the maternal heart rate.
电子胎儿监护(EFM)是一种监测胎儿宫内情况和胎儿储备能力的方法,是产科中应用最广泛的宫内监测技术。
本研究旨在比较 Thoth 可穿戴胎儿心电图(胎儿心电图[FECG])监测系统与传统多普勒胎儿心脏监测系统在产前的各自价值。
采用便利抽样法,选取 2020 年至 2022 年在我院就诊的 393 名孕妇进行研究。采用配对设计评估混淆率、趋势重叠和胎儿心率/心电图监测一致性,采用完全随机设计测量妊娠结局指标。采用随机数字表将参与者分为 Thoth 组(n=196)和传统多普勒组(n=197)。两组均采用相应的系统进行监测。
Thoth 监护仪的混淆率低于传统多普勒监护仪(0.25%比 2.04%;χ2=5.508,P=0.019)。胎儿心率的趋势重叠始终为 100%,91.2%的读数一致性率 ⩾95%。此外,Thoth 监护仪记录的胎儿心率曲线累计中断时间更长(12.13±2.22 比 21.02±2.34;t=18.471,P<0.001),异常心电图更多(21.21±4.32 比 18.21±2.91;t=7.582,P<0.001)。
Thoth 可穿戴胎儿心电图监测仪比传统多普勒胎儿心脏监测系统具有许多优势。这些优势包括混淆率降低、数据采集更准确、临床误判率降低、医务人员工作量减少以及阴道分娩时舒适度提高。Thoth 组的紧急剖宫产率和新生儿窒息率略低于多普勒组,这可能与心电图中断或母体心率干扰等问题有关。