Coffetti Elvira, Paans Wolter, Krijnen Wim P, Roodbol Petrie F, Finnema Evelyn J, Zuidersma Jelly
Health in Context Research Institute, University Medical Centre, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Research Group Reciprocity in Learning Networks, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Mar;81(3):1364-1375. doi: 10.1111/jan.16337. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
The aim of this study is to measure how collaborative factors are associated with the technology readiness of nursing staff working in residential care and community nursing. The Reciprocity Instrument and Technology Readiness Index 2.0 were applied to measure this association.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted between October 2020 and January 2021.
The Technology Readiness Index 2.0 was translated into Dutch, administered together with the Reciprocity Instrument and linguistically validated. And 1660 Registered Nurses and Nursing Assistants received an invitation to the online survey. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were used to analyse the data.
A total of 475 nursing staff responded, a response rate of 28.6%. The following factors have a statistically significant association with technology readiness: age, education level, years of working experience, type of organization, reciprocity behaviour and conditions of reciprocity behaviour: digital communication usage to reach one another, multilayeredness and future perspective.
This study shows that reciprocity behaviour is positively associated with technology readiness. The influencing factor reciprocity remains intact after the correction of the other factors that were measured. This confirms the relevance of collaborative factors that influence the technology adoption process of nursing staff working in residential care and community nursing.
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: This study offers insights into how collaboration based on reciprocity behaviour positively impacts the technology readiness of nursing staff engaged in residential care and community nursing and could be used in the education of nursing staff and healthcare teams.
Being aware of the impact that collaborative factors have on the adoption process of ICT among nursing staff could be used to support the desired preparatory activities as part of ICT implementation for healthcare managers, innovators, and nursing work groups charged with implementing technology in the healthcare process.
The study has adhered to STROBE guidelines.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
本研究旨在衡量协作因素与在居家护理和社区护理工作的护理人员的技术准备情况之间的关联。应用互惠工具和技术准备指数2.0来衡量这种关联。
于2020年10月至2021年1月进行了一项横断面调查。
将技术准备指数2.0翻译成荷兰语,与互惠工具一起进行管理并进行语言验证。1660名注册护士和护理助理收到了在线调查邀请。使用描述性统计和回归分析来分析数据。
共有475名护理人员做出回应,回应率为28.6%。以下因素与技术准备情况具有统计学上的显著关联:年龄、教育水平、工作年限、组织类型、互惠行为以及互惠行为的条件:相互联系的数字通信使用情况、多层次性和未来展望。
本研究表明,互惠行为与技术准备情况呈正相关。在对其他测量因素进行校正后,影响因素互惠性依然存在。这证实了影响居家护理和社区护理工作的护理人员技术采用过程的协作因素的相关性。
对专业和/或患者护理的启示:本研究深入探讨了基于互惠行为的协作如何对从事居家护理和社区护理的护理人员的技术准备情况产生积极影响,并可用于护理人员和医疗团队的教育。
了解协作因素对护理人员信息通信技术采用过程的影响,可用于支持医疗保健经理、创新者以及负责在医疗保健过程中实施技术的护理工作小组进行信息通信技术实施所需的准备活动。
本研究遵循了STROBE指南。
无患者或公众贡献。