Department of Education and Research in General Practice, University Côte d'Azur, RETINES, HEALTHY, Nice, France.
Sorbonne University, INSERM, University Sorbonne Paris-Nord, LIMICS, Paris, France.
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Mar;80(3):884-907. doi: 10.1111/jan.15865. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
To describe the key elements of the interprofessional decision-making process in health, based on published scientific studies. To describe the authors, reviews and subject matter of those publications.
Scoping review of the literature.
MEDLINE, APA Psycinfo OpenGrey, Lissa and Cochrane databases were searched in December 2019 and January 2023.
References were considered eligible if they (i) were written in French or English, (ii) concerned health, (iii) studied a clinical decision-making process, (iv) were performed in an interprofessional context. 'PRISMA-scoping review' guidelines were respected. The eligible studies were analysed and classified by an inductive approach RESULTS: We identified 1429 sources of information, 145 of which were retained for the analysis. Based on these studies, we identified five key elements of interprofessional decision-making in health. The process was found to be influenced by group dynamics, the available information and consideration of the unique characteristics of the patient. An organizational framework and specific training favoured improvements in the process.
Decision-making can be based on a willingness of the healthcare organization to promote models based on more shared leadership and to work on professional roles and values. It also requires healthcare professionals trained in the entire continuum of collaborative practices, to meet the unique needs of each patient. Finally, it appears essential to favour the sharing of multiple sources of accessible and structured information. Tools for knowledge formalization should help to optimize interprofessional decision-making in health.
The quality of a team decision-making is critical to the quality of care. Interprofessional decision-making can be structured and improved through different levels of action. These improvements could benefit to patients and healthcare professionals in every settings of care involving care collaboration.
Interprofessional decision-making in health is an essential lever of quality of care, especially for the most complex patients which are a contemporary challenge. This scoping review article offers a synthesis of a large corpus of data published to date about the interprofessional clinical decision-making process in healthcare. It has the potential to provide a global vision, practical data and a list of references to facilitate the work of healthcare teams, organizations and teachers ready to initiate a change.
基于已发表的科学研究,描述卫生领域中跨专业决策的关键要素。描述这些出版物的作者、综述和主题。
文献范围综述。
2019 年 12 月至 2023 年 1 月,在 MEDLINE、APA Psycinfo OpenGrey、Lissa 和 Cochrane 数据库中进行检索。
如果参考文献(i)用法语或英语书写,(ii)涉及卫生,(iii)研究临床决策过程,(iv)在跨专业背景下进行,则被认为符合条件。遵守了“PRISMA 范围综述”指南。使用归纳法对合格的研究进行分析和分类。
我们确定了 1429 个信息来源,其中 145 个被保留进行分析。基于这些研究,我们确定了卫生领域跨专业决策的五个关键要素。研究发现,该过程受到群体动态、可用信息和考虑患者独特特征的影响。组织框架和具体培训有利于改进该过程。
决策可以基于医疗机构促进更具共享领导力的模式的意愿,并致力于专业角色和价值观。它还需要接受过整个协作实践培训的医疗保健专业人员,以满足每个患者的独特需求。最后,似乎必须促进多种可访问和结构化信息的共享。知识规范化工具应有助于优化卫生领域的跨专业决策。
团队决策的质量对护理质量至关重要。通过不同层面的行动,可以构建和改进跨专业决策。这些改进可以使每个护理环境中的患者和医疗保健专业人员受益,包括涉及护理协作的环境。
卫生领域的跨专业决策是护理质量的重要杠杆,尤其是对最复杂的患者而言,这些患者是当代的挑战。本文综述文章对迄今为止发表的关于医疗保健中跨专业临床决策过程的大量数据进行了综合分析。它有可能提供全面的视野、实际数据和参考列表,以方便医疗团队、组织和准备发起变革的教师的工作。