Institute for the Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Gjøvik, Norway.
Centre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2024 Oct;30(7):1386-1395. doi: 10.1111/jep.14058. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
Low-value radiological imaging threatens patient safety and efficient use of limited health resources. It is important to evaluate measures for reducing low-value utilisation, to learn and to improve. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to qualitatively evaluate a pilot intervention for reducing low-value imaging in Norway.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted aimed at describing stakeholders' experience with a multicomponent pilot intervention consisting of a standardised procedure for referral assessment, a standardised return letter, and information about the value and possible risks of magnetic resonance imaging-examinations to the public. Data were analysed in line with qualitative content analysis with a deductive approach.
Seven healthcare providers were interviewed, including two radiologists, two radiographers, one manual therapist, one practice consultant and one general practitioner. Data analysis yielded four categories: (1) information and reception, (2) referral- and assessment processes, (3) suggestions for improvement and facilitation and (4) outcomes of the pilot intervention.
The pilot intervention was deemed acceptable, feasible, engaging and relevant. Specific training in the use of the new procedure was suggested to improve the intervention. The simple design, as well as the positive acceptance demonstrated and the few resources needed, make the pilot intervention and methodology highly relevant for other settings or when aiming to reduce the number of other low-value radiology examinations.
低价值影像学检查威胁患者安全和有限卫生资源的有效利用。评估减少低价值应用的措施、学习和改进措施非常重要。因此,本研究的目的是定性评估挪威一项减少低价值影像学检查的试点干预措施。
采用半结构式访谈,旨在描述利益相关者对包括转诊评估标准化程序、标准化回复函以及向公众介绍磁共振成像检查的价值和潜在风险在内的多组分试点干预措施的经验。数据分析采用演绎法的定性内容分析法。
共访谈了 7 名医疗保健提供者,包括 2 名放射科医生、2 名放射技师、1 名手动治疗师、1 名实践顾问和 1 名全科医生。数据分析得出了四个类别:(1)信息和接收,(2)转诊和评估流程,(3)改进和促进建议,(4)试点干预的结果。
试点干预措施被认为是可接受、可行、有吸引力和相关的。建议进行新程序使用的特定培训,以改进干预措施。该方案设计简单,得到了积极的认可,所需资源很少,因此对于其他环境或旨在减少其他低价值影像学检查数量的情况非常相关。