Radboud University Medical Center, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Internal Medicine, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, The Netherlands.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2024 Oct;30(7):1361-1372. doi: 10.1111/jep.14053. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
Healthcare systems remain disease oriented despite growing sustainability concerns caused by inadequate management of patients with multimorbidity. Comprehensive care programmes (CCPs) can play an important role in streamlining care delivery, but large differences in setup and results hinder firm conclusions on their effectiveness. Many elements for successful implementation of CCPs are identified, but strategies to overcome barriers and embed programmes within health systems remain unknown.
To address this knowledge gap through a detailed study of implementing a CCP in a Dutch hospital setting, including patient experiences, facilitators, barriers and ways to overcome those barriers. Additionally, this study aims to explore effects on patient satisfaction and healthcare use.
A qualitative study design with 39 semistructured interviews and focus groups between July 2020 and February 2023 with 16 patients and 17 involved professionals. Additionally, effects on quantitative outcomes for patient satisfaction (PACIC-20) and healthcare use were explored.
Professionals expressed a wide range of topics related to implementation and ways to overcome barriers at hospital and system level. Alterations in the design to accommodate varying care demands, focus on inclusions through referrals, and lack of long-term support and appropriate financing were key topics. Patients expressed varying experiences, stated a strong desire for comprehensive information, and emphasised the importance of trust in caregivers. Patient satisfaction showed no effects, while healthcare use showed slight decreases in trends, but patient numbers were limited.
The introduction of a CCP is feasible, and exploratory analysis on effectiveness shows lower hospital care use without decreasing patient satisfaction. However, this is accompanied by several challenges that show current fragmented systems still do not support implementation of integrated care initiatives. Overcoming those comes with substantial costs and may require a strong bottom-up implementation within a motivated team and actions on all levels of healthcare systems.
尽管对患有多种疾病的患者管理不善导致可持续性问题日益严重,但医疗保健系统仍然以疾病为导向。综合护理计划(CCP)可以在简化护理服务方面发挥重要作用,但由于设置和结果存在很大差异,因此无法确定其有效性。已经确定了成功实施 CCP 的许多要素,但克服障碍并将计划嵌入卫生系统的策略仍不清楚。
通过详细研究荷兰医院环境中 CCP 的实施情况,包括患者的体验、促进因素、障碍以及克服这些障碍的方法,来填补这一知识空白。此外,本研究旨在探讨对患者满意度和医疗保健使用的影响。
采用定性研究设计,于 2020 年 7 月至 2023 年 2 月期间对 16 名患者和 17 名参与专业人员进行了 39 次半结构化访谈和焦点小组讨论。此外,还探讨了对患者满意度(PACIC-20)和医疗保健使用的定量结果的影响。
专业人员表达了与医院和系统层面的实施和克服障碍的方式相关的广泛主题。改变设计以适应不同的护理需求、通过转介关注包容性、缺乏长期支持和适当的融资是关键主题。患者的体验各不相同,他们强烈希望获得全面的信息,并强调对护理人员的信任的重要性。患者满意度没有影响,而医疗保健使用呈下降趋势,但患者人数有限。
引入 CCP 是可行的,对有效性的探索性分析表明,医院护理使用减少,但不会降低患者满意度。然而,这伴随着一些挑战,表明当前碎片化的系统仍然不支持综合护理计划的实施。克服这些挑战需要在一个有动力的团队内部进行大量的自下而上的实施,并在医疗保健系统的所有层面采取行动。