Department of Anesthesiology and Perioprative Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Department of General Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 20;14(7):e084827. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084827.
This study aimed to compare the effects of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with and without low-basal infusion on postoperative hypoxaemia.
A randomised parallel-group non-inferiority trial.
The trial was conducted at a grade-A tertiary hospital from December 2021 to August 2022.
160 adults undergoing gastrointestinal tumour surgery and receiving postoperative PCIA.
Participants randomly received a low-basal (0.1 mg/hour of hydromorphone) or no-basal infusion PCIA for postoperative 48 hours.
Primary outcome was area under curve (AUC) per hour for hypoxaemia, defined as pulse oxygen saturation (SpO) <95%. Secondary outcomes included: AUC per hour at SpO<90% and <85%, hydromorphone consumption, ambulation time and analgesic outcomes up to 48 hours after surgery.
Among 160 randomised patients, 159 completed the trial. An intention-to-treat analysis showed that AUC per hour (SpO<95%) was greater in the low-basal infusion group compared with the no-basal infusion group, with a median difference of 0.097 (95% CI 0.001 to 0.245). Non-inferiority (margin: ratio of means (ROM) of 1.25) was not confirmed since the ROM between the two groups was 2.146 (95% CI 2.138 to 2.155). Hydromorphone consumption was higher in the low-basal group than in the no-basal group (median: 5.2 mg versus 1.6 mg, p<0.001). Meanwhile, there were no differences in the AUC values at the other two hypoxaemia thresholds, in ambulation time, or pain scores between the groups.
Among the patients receiving hydromorphone PCIA after gastrointestinal tumour resection, low-basal infusion was inferior to no-basal infusion PCIA for postoperative hypoxaemia at SpO<95% up to 48 hours after surgery.
ChiCTR2100054317.
本研究旨在比较有和没有低基础输注的患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)对术后低氧血症的影响。
一项随机平行组非劣效性试验。
试验于 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 8 月在一家甲级三级医院进行。
160 名接受胃肠肿瘤手术并接受术后 PCIA 的成年人。
参与者随机接受低基础(氢吗啡酮 0.1 毫克/小时)或无基础输注 PCIA,持续 48 小时。
主要结果是定义为脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO)<95%的低氧血症每小时的曲线下面积(AUC)。次要结果包括:SpO<90%和<85%的每小时 AUC、氢吗啡酮消耗、术后 48 小时内的活动时间和镇痛结果。
在 160 名随机患者中,有 159 名完成了试验。意向治疗分析显示,低基础输注组的每小时 AUC(SpO<95%)大于无基础输注组,中位数差值为 0.097(95%置信区间 0.001 至 0.245)。由于两组之间的比值为 2.146(95%置信区间 2.138 至 2.155),非劣效性(比率均值(ROM)为 1.25)未得到证实。低基础组的氢吗啡酮消耗高于无基础组(中位数:5.2 毫克比 1.6 毫克,p<0.001)。同时,两组间在其他两个低氧血症阈值的 AUC 值、活动时间或疼痛评分上无差异。
在胃肠肿瘤切除术后接受氢吗啡酮 PCIA 的患者中,与无基础输注 PCIA 相比,低基础输注在术后 48 小时内的 SpO<95%的低氧血症方面较差。
ChiCTR2100054317。