Suppr超能文献

超声甲状腺结节风险分层简化:人工智能甲状腺影像报告和数据系统的验证和性能。

Simplifying risk stratification for thyroid nodules on ultrasound: validation and performance of an artificial intelligence thyroid imaging reporting and data system.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2024 Nov-Dec;53(6):695-699. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.07.006. Epub 2024 Jul 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To validate the performance of a recently created risk stratification system (RSS) for thyroid nodules on ultrasound, the Artificial Intelligence Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (AI TI-RADS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

378 thyroid nodules from 320 patients were included in this retrospective evaluation. All nodules had ultrasound images and had undergone fine needle aspiration (FNA). 147 nodules were Bethesda V or VI (suspicious or diagnostic for malignancy), and 231 were Bethesda II (benign). Three radiologists assigned features according to the AI TI-RADS lexicon (same categories and features as the American College of Radiology TI-RADS) to each nodule based on ultrasound images. FNA recommendations using AI TI-RADS and ACR TI-RADS were then compared and sensitivity and specificity for each RSS were calculated.

RESULTS

Across three readers, mean sensitivity of AI TI-RADS was lower than ACR TI-RADS (0.69 vs 0.72, p < 0.02), while mean specificity was higher (0.40 vs 0.37, p < 0.02). Overall total number of points assigned by all three readers decreased slightly when using AI TI-RADS (5,998 for AI TI-RADS vs 6,015 for ACR TI-RADS), including more values of 0 to several features.

CONCLUSION

AI TI-RADS performed similarly to ACR TI-RADS while eliminating point assignments for many features, allowing for simplification of future TI-RADS versions.

摘要

目的

验证最近创建的甲状腺结节超声人工智能甲状腺成像报告和数据系统(AI TI-RADS)风险分层系统(RSS)的性能。

材料和方法

回顾性评估纳入了 320 名患者的 378 个甲状腺结节。所有结节均有超声图像,并进行了细针抽吸(FNA)。147 个结节为 Bethesda V 或 VI 级(可疑或恶性诊断),231 个为 Bethesda II 级(良性)。三位放射科医生根据 AI TI-RADS 词汇表(与美国放射学院 TI-RADS 相同的类别和特征)对每个结节的超声图像进行特征分配。然后比较了使用 AI TI-RADS 和 ACR TI-RADS 的 FNA 推荐意见,并计算了每个 RSS 的敏感性和特异性。

结果

在三位读者中,AI TI-RADS 的平均敏感性低于 ACR TI-RADS(0.69 对 0.72,p < 0.02),而平均特异性更高(0.40 对 0.37,p < 0.02)。当使用 AI TI-RADS 时,所有三位读者分配的总积分略有下降(AI TI-RADS 为 5998 分,ACR TI-RADS 为 6015 分),包括更多的 0 至几个特征值。

结论

AI TI-RADS 的表现与 ACR TI-RADS 相似,同时消除了许多特征的评分,简化了未来 TI-RADS 版本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验