Delija Omazić Barbara, Buković Dino, Žagar Maja, Šlaj Martina, Illeš Davor
Department of Orthodontics, Dental Polyclinic Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Department of Prosthodontics, University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2024 Jun;58(2):185-192. doi: 10.15644/asc58/2/8.
To ascertain the degree of precision and repeatability inherent in the "capture to edit" digital imaging system, namely the ColorChecker Passport Photo (X-Rite, MI, USA), and to juxtapose its performance against spectrophotometric assessments utilizing the Vita Easyshade® (Vita Zahnfabrik, H Rauter GmbH & Co. KG., Bad Sackingen, Germany) for the same set of teeth.
Eighty participants aged 19-25 were included in the study; all of them were Croatian students at the School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb. Color measurements of the maxillary right central incisors were performed in controlled, standardized laboratory conditions. The measurements were performed on calibrated digital photographs by an experienced clinician three times in a row, and L, a, and b of CIELAB color space values were recorded. The same procedure was performed using the Vita Easyshade 5.0 spectrophotometer (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) in "Tooth single" mode.
The Cronbach's alpha was used as a repeatability measurement, thus revealing high consistency for both methods (α=0.94-1). Correlations were moderate (Pearson r=0.44-0.66 p<0.05). Testing confirmed that digital photography is inaccurate as spectrophotometry (p<0.05). An analysis of errors of means and their standard deviations revealed consistent discrepancies with minor deviations.
The "capture to edit" method showed high consistency (Cronbach's α=0.94-0.96), and it exhibits comparability in terms of variability, reliability, and repeatability when compared to spectrophotometric measurement (VitaShade 5, VitaZahnfabrik). Disparities between the methods are evident and anticipated, yet they do not follow a consistently linear pattern. The combination of repeatability and consistency renders the "capture to edit" method a valuable tool for enhanced color mapping, thus facilitating comparisons between digital images.
确定“采集到编辑”数字成像系统(即ColorChecker Passport Photo,美国密歇根州爱色丽公司)固有的精确程度和可重复性,并将其性能与使用Vita Easyshade®(德国巴特萨克根市维他齿科工厂H劳特有限公司)对同一组牙齿进行的分光光度评估进行对比。
本研究纳入了80名年龄在19至25岁之间的参与者;他们均为萨格勒布大学牙医学院的克罗地亚学生。在上颌右侧中切牙的颜色测量是在可控的标准化实验室条件下进行的。由一位经验丰富的临床医生对校准后的数码照片连续进行三次测量,并记录CIELAB颜色空间值的L、a和b。使用Vita Easyshade 5.0分光光度计(德国巴特萨克根市维他齿科工厂)在“单颗牙齿”模式下进行相同的操作。
使用克朗巴哈系数作为可重复性测量指标,结果显示两种方法都具有高度一致性(α=0.94 - 1)。相关性为中等(皮尔逊r=0.44 - 0.66,p<0.05)。测试证实数码摄影不如分光光度法准确(p<0.05)。对均值误差及其标准差的分析显示存在一致的差异且偏差较小。
“采集到编辑”方法显示出高度一致性(克朗巴哈α=0.94 - 0.96),与分光光度测量(VitaShade 五号,维他齿科工厂)相比,在变异性、可靠性和可重复性方面具有可比性。两种方法之间的差异是明显且可预期的,但它们并不遵循一致的线性模式。可重复性和一致性的结合使“采集到编辑”方法成为增强颜色映射的有价值工具,从而便于数字图像之间的比较。