Matusov Eugene
University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Dec;58(4):1930-1962. doi: 10.1007/s12124-024-09860-w. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
In this philosophical-theoretical study of Lev Tolstoy's pedagogical legacy of his Yasnaya Polyana school in the Russian Empire (1859-1862), I raised three major questions: (1) was Lev Tolstoy a democratic educator, and if so, why can one claim that, (2) if so, what kind of a democratic educator was he, and (3) what kind of limitations to his democratic education have I observe and what were the sources of these limitations? My answer to the first question was unequivocally positive. I argue that Tolstoy was the conceptual founder of democratic non-coercive education and the first known practitioner of democratic education for children. In my view, his democratic education was based on educational offerings provided by the teachers. His democratic educational philosophy was based on non-coercion, naturalism, anarchism, liveliness, pragmatism, pedagogical experimentation, student responses, pedagogical self-reflection, and dialogism. At the same time, his democratic education was limited to his uncritical acceptance of conventionalism. Tolstoy's attraction to Progressive Education was facilitated by ignoring his enormous powers, both explicit and implicit, that he manifested exercised in the school and enacted through his "pervasive informality." In my judgment, Tolstoy overemphasized pedagogy over self-education and did not distinguish learning from education. Still, Tolstoy's pioneering work in democratic education, both in theory and practice, remains mostly unacknowledged and unanalyzed while continuing to be highly relevant and potentially influential.
在这项关于列夫·托尔斯泰在俄罗斯帝国亚斯纳亚·波利亚纳学校(1859 - 1862年)的教育遗产的哲学 - 理论研究中,我提出了三个主要问题:(1)列夫·托尔斯泰是一位民主教育家吗?如果是,为何可以这样宣称?(2)如果是,他是何种类型的民主教育家?(3)我观察到他的民主教育存在哪些局限性,这些局限性的根源是什么?我对第一个问题的回答是明确肯定的。我认为托尔斯泰是民主非强制性教育的概念创始人,也是首位已知的儿童民主教育践行者。在我看来,他的民主教育基于教师提供的教育内容。他的民主教育理念基于非强制性、自然主义、无政府主义、生动性、实用主义、教学实验、学生反馈、教学自我反思以及对话主义。与此同时,他的民主教育局限于对传统主义的不加批判的接受。托尔斯泰对进步教育的吸引力源于他忽视了自己在学校展现出的巨大的显性和隐性力量,以及通过他“无处不在的非正式性”所实施的影响。在我看来,托尔斯泰过度强调教学法而忽视了自我教育,且未区分学习与教育。尽管如此,托尔斯泰在民主教育方面的开创性工作,无论是在理论还是实践上,大多仍未得到认可和分析,但其仍然具有高度的相关性和潜在影响力。