Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Bracknell, Bracknell Forest, UK.
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 22;14(7):e084203. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084203.
To test whether inflammatory processes link the expression of childhood neurodivergent traits to chronic disabling fatigue in adolescence.
Longitudinal case-control study.
We analysed data from The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC).
8115 and 8036 children of the ALSPAC cohort at ages 7 and 9 years, respectively, 4563 of whom also completed self-report measures at age 18 years.
We assessed if children scoring above screening threshold for autism/attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) at ages 7 and 9 years had increased risk of chronic disabling fatigue at age 18 years, computing ORs and CIs for effects using binary logistic regression. Mediation analyses were conducted to test if an inflammatory marker (interleukin 6 (IL-6)) at age 9 years linked neurodivergent traits to chronic disabling fatigue at age 18 years.
Children with neurodivergent traits at ages 7 and 9 years were two times as likely to experience chronic disabling fatigue at age 18 years (likely ADHD OR=2.18 (95% CI=1.33 to 3.56); p=0.002; likely autism OR=1.78 (95% CI=1.17 to 2.72); p=0.004). Levels of IL-6 at age 9 were associated with chronic disabling fatigue at age 18 (OR=1.54 (95% CI=1.13 to 2.11); p=0.006). Inflammation at age 9 years mediated effects of neurodivergent traits on chronic disabling fatigue (indirect effect via IL-6: ADHD b=1.08 (95% CI=1.01 to 1.15); autism b=1.06; (95% CI=1.03 to 1.10)). All effects remained significant when controlling for the presence of depressive symptoms.
Our results indicate higher risk of chronic disabling fatigue for children with neurodivergent traits, likely linked to higher levels of inflammation. The implementation of transdiagnostic screening criteria to inform support strategies to counteract risk early in life is recommended.
探究炎症过程是否将儿童神经发育特质的表达与青少年时期的慢性致残性疲劳联系起来。
纵向病例对照研究。
我们分析了阿冯纵向父母和子女研究(ALSPAC)的数据。
分别为 8115 名和 8036 名 ALSPAC 队列的儿童,年龄分别为 7 岁和 9 岁,其中 4563 名儿童在 18 岁时还完成了自我报告测量。
我们评估了 7 岁和 9 岁时自闭症/注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)筛查阈值以上的儿童在 18 岁时是否有更高的慢性致残性疲劳风险,使用二元逻辑回归计算效应的 OR 和 CI。进行中介分析以测试 9 岁时的炎症标志物(白细胞介素 6(IL-6))是否将神经发育特质与 18 岁时的慢性致残性疲劳联系起来。
7 岁和 9 岁时具有神经发育特质的儿童在 18 岁时经历慢性致残性疲劳的可能性是两倍(可能的 ADHD OR=2.18(95%CI=1.33 至 3.56);p=0.002;可能的自闭症 OR=1.78(95%CI=1.17 至 2.72);p=0.004)。9 岁时的 IL-6 水平与 18 岁时的慢性致残性疲劳相关(OR=1.54(95%CI=1.13 至 2.11);p=0.006)。9 岁时的炎症通过 IL-6 介导了神经发育特质对慢性致残性疲劳的影响(间接效应:ADHD b=1.08(95%CI=1.01 至 1.15);自闭症 b=1.06(95%CI=1.03 至 1.10))。当控制抑郁症状的存在时,所有效应仍然显著。
我们的研究结果表明,具有神经发育特质的儿童患慢性致残性疲劳的风险更高,这可能与更高的炎症水平有关。建议实施跨诊断筛查标准,以告知早期支持策略,以对抗风险。