Pisljagic Sanja, Temberg Jens L, Steensbæk Mathias T, Yousef Sina, Maagaard Mathias, Chafranska Lana, Lange Kai H W, Rothe Christian, Lundstrøm Lars H, Nørskov Anders K
Department of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark.
Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Oct;68(9):1149-1160. doi: 10.1111/aas.14474. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
Peripheral nerve blocks may provide better conditions for closed reduction of distal radius fractures as compared to other more frequently used modalities. In this systematic review, we evaluate existing evidence on the effect and harm of peripheral nerve blocks for closed reduction of distal radius fractures in adults.
We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis including trials investigating the use of peripheral nerve blocks for closed reduction of distal radius fractures. Co-primary outcomes were (1) the quality of the closed reduction measured as the proportion of participants needing surgery afterwards and (2) pain during closed reduction.
Six trials (n = 312) met the inclusion criteria. One trial reported on the need for surgery with 4 of 25 participants receiving nerve block compared to 7 of 25 receiving haematoma block needing surgery (RR 0.57, 96.7% CI [0.19; 1.71], p = .50). Four trials reported pain during closed reduction. In a meta-analysis, pain was not statistically significantly reduced with a nerve block (-2.1 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) points (0-10), 96.7% CI [-4.4; 0.2], p = .07, tau = 5.4, I = 97%, TSA-adj. 95% CI [-11.5; 7.3]). No trial sequential boundaries were crossed, and the required information size was not met. Pre-planned subgroup analysis on trials evaluating ultrasound guided peripheral nerve blocks (patients = 110) showed a significant decrease in 'pain during reduction' (-4.1 NRS, 96.7% CI [-5.5; -2.6], p < .01, tau = 0.9, I = 80%). All trial results were at high risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence was very low.
The certainty of evidence on the effect of peripheral nerve blocks for closed reduction of distal radius fractures is currently very low. Peripheral nerve blocks performed with ultrasound guidance may potentially reduce pain during closed reduction. High-quality clinical trials are warranted.
与其他更常用的方法相比,外周神经阻滞可能为桡骨远端骨折的闭合复位提供更好的条件。在本系统评价中,我们评估了关于外周神经阻滞对成人桡骨远端骨折闭合复位的效果和危害的现有证据。
我们进行了一项包括荟萃分析和试验序贯分析的系统评价,纳入了研究外周神经阻滞用于桡骨远端骨折闭合复位的试验。共同主要结局为:(1)以术后需要手术的参与者比例衡量的闭合复位质量;(2)闭合复位期间的疼痛。
六项试验(n = 312)符合纳入标准。一项试验报告了手术需求,25名接受神经阻滞的参与者中有4名需要手术,而25名接受血肿阻滞的参与者中有7名需要手术(风险比0.57,96.7%可信区间[0.19;1.71],p = 0.50)。四项试验报告了闭合复位期间的疼痛。在荟萃分析中,神经阻滞并未使疼痛有统计学意义的降低(数字评定量表(NRS)降低-2.1分(0 - 10分),96.7%可信区间[-4.4;0.2],p = 0.07,tau = 5.4,I² = 97%,经试验序贯分析调整后的95%可信区间[-11.5;7.3])。未跨越试验序贯分析界限,且未达到所需信息量。对评估超声引导外周神经阻滞的试验(患者 = 110)进行的预先计划的亚组分析显示,“复位期间疼痛”显著降低(NRS降低-4.1分,96.7%可信区间[-5.5;-2.6],p < 0.01,tau = 0.9,I² = 80%)。所有试验结果均存在高偏倚风险,证据的确定性非常低。
目前关于外周神经阻滞对桡骨远端骨折闭合复位效果的证据确定性非常低。超声引导下进行的外周神经阻滞可能会降低闭合复位期间的疼痛。需要高质量的临床试验。