Suppr超能文献

确定性指标与感染艾滋病毒及性传播感染风险之间关联的证据强度:为献血政策的改变提供证据

Determining the strength of evidence for an association between sexual indicators and risk of acquiring HIV and sexually transmitted infections: Providing evidence for blood donation policy change.

作者信息

Flannagan Joe, Davison Katy L, Reynolds Claire, Brailsford Susan R

机构信息

UK Health Security Agency, London, UK.

NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Transfus Med. 2024 Dec;34(6):466-477. doi: 10.1111/tme.13062. Epub 2024 Jul 22.

Abstract

In 2019 the For The Assessment Of Individualised Risk (FAIR) project began a review of UK blood donor selection policy to determine if a more individualised approach to donor selection could be safely implemented. An evidence base was required to inform selection policy to move from a population to a more individual based policy, specifically what sexual behaviours/indicators should be considered as screening questions to maintain the safety of the blood supply. Eight sexual behaviours/indicators were reviewed: history of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs), chemsex, number of recent partners, condom use, type of sex, sexual health service (SHS) attendance, new sexual partner and exclusivity. We conducted searches in multiple databases to identify literature looking at the association between these behaviours/indicators and HIV/STI acquisition risk. A scoring system to determine strength of evidence was devised and applied to papers that passed screening. Key studies were identified which achieved the maximum score and more in-depth reviews were conducted for these. We identified 58 studies, including 17 key studies. Strong evidence was found linking a previous bacterial STI, chemsex and increasing numbers of sexual partners to acquisition risk. Condom use, type of sex and new partners were found to have some strength of evidence for this link. SHS attendance and exclusivity had minimal evidence. We recommended that the behaviours/indicators viewed as having strong or some strength of evidence should be considered as screening questions in a more individualised approach to donor selection criteria.

摘要

2019年,个性化风险评估(FAIR)项目开始对英国献血者筛选政策进行审查,以确定是否能够安全实施更具个性化的献血者筛选方法。需要一个证据基础来为筛选政策提供依据,以便从基于人群的政策转向更基于个体的政策,特别是应将哪些性行为/指标视为筛选问题,以确保血液供应的安全。对八项性行为/指标进行了审查:细菌性性传播感染(STI)病史、化学性行为、近期性伴侣数量、是否使用避孕套、性行为类型、是否前往性健康服务机构(SHS)、新的性伴侣以及性伴侣的专一性。我们在多个数据库中进行检索,以查找研究这些行为/指标与感染HIV/STI风险之间关联的文献。设计了一个证据强度评分系统,并应用于通过筛选的论文。确定了获得最高分的关键研究,并对这些研究进行了更深入的审查。我们共识别出58项研究,其中包括17项关键研究。发现有强有力的证据表明,既往细菌性STI病史、化学性行为以及性伴侣数量增加与感染风险相关。使用避孕套、性行为类型和新性伴侣在这一关联上有一定的证据支持。前往SHS和性伴侣专一性的证据最少。我们建议,在采用更具个性化的献血者筛选标准方法时,应将被视为有强有力或一定证据支持的行为/指标作为筛选问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cb8/11653059/bc91b67c6d19/TME-34-466-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验