Samuelsen Abigail, Lehman Erik, Burrows Parker, Bonavia Anthony S
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA 17033.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033.
medRxiv. 2024 Jul 11:2024.07.11.24310285. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.11.24310285.
Immunoparalysis is a significant concern in patients with sepsis and critical illness, potentially leading to increased risk of secondary infections. This study aimed to perform a longitudinal assessment of immune function over the initial two weeks following the onset of sepsis and critical illness. We compared ex vivo stimulated cytokine release to traditional markers of immunoparalysis, including monocyte Human Leukocyte Antigen (mHLA)-DR expression and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC). A total of 64 critically ill patients were recruited in a tertiary care academic medical setting, including 31 septic and 33 non-septic patients. Results showed that while mHLA-DR expression significantly increased over time, this was primarily driven by the non-septic subset of critically ill patients. ALC recovery was more prominent in septic patients. Ex vivo stimulation revealed significant increases in TNF and IL-6 production over time in septic patients. However, IFNγ production varied with the stimulant used and did not show significant recovery when normalized to cell count. No significant correlation was found between mHLA-DR expression and other immunoparalysis biomarkers. These findings suggest the need for more nuanced immune monitoring approaches beyond the traditional 'sepsis' versus 'non-sepsis' classifications in critically ill patients. It also provided further evidence of a potential window for targeted immunotherapeutic interventions in the first week of critical illness.
免疫麻痹是脓毒症和危重病患者的一个重大问题,可能导致继发感染风险增加。本研究旨在对脓毒症和危重病发作后的最初两周内的免疫功能进行纵向评估。我们将体外刺激后的细胞因子释放与免疫麻痹的传统标志物进行了比较,包括单核细胞人类白细胞抗原(mHLA)-DR表达和绝对淋巴细胞计数(ALC)。在一家三级医疗学术机构共招募了64例危重病患者,其中包括31例脓毒症患者和33例非脓毒症患者。结果显示,虽然mHLA-DR表达随时间显著增加,但这主要是由危重病患者中的非脓毒症亚组驱动的。脓毒症患者的ALC恢复更为显著。体外刺激显示,脓毒症患者的TNF和IL-6产生随时间显著增加。然而,IFNγ的产生因所用刺激物而异,在按细胞计数标准化后未显示出显著恢复。未发现mHLA-DR表达与其他免疫麻痹生物标志物之间存在显著相关性。这些发现表明,在危重病患者中,除了传统的“脓毒症”与“非脓毒症”分类之外,还需要更细致入微的免疫监测方法。这也为危重病第一周内进行靶向免疫治疗干预的潜在窗口期提供了进一步证据。