Rosser Erica N, Klein Sabra L, Rothman Richard E, Pekosz Andrew, Morgan Rosemary
medRxiv. 2024 Jul 11:2024.07.10.24310248. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.10.24310248.
Although they face higher occupational risk of contracting viral respiratory infections, hospital healthcare worker vaccine hesitancy persists. While most studies have used survey methods to quantify the prevalence of and reasons for healthcare worker vaccine hesitancy, this study employs a qualitative approach to understand their attitudes and beliefs associated with influenza and COVID-19 vaccination.
To understand frontline healthcare worker experiences and perspectives on influenza and COVID-19 vaccination, 30 semi-structured interviews were conducted in summer/fall 2022 with staff recruited from two Johns Hopkins hospitals in Maryland. An in-depth, key informant interview was conducted with an expert in public health audience engagement. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed for thematic and Framework analysis using NVivo software (QSR International, Melbourne, Australia).
Healthcare workers engaged in little influenza vaccine information seeking due to their familiarity with the disease and low perceived disease severity. Approximately half (n=16) of healthcare workers reported no vaccine hesitancy towards influenza or COVID-19 vaccines. No physicians or physician assistants expressed any vaccine hesitancy, while most nurses expressed some (n=10). More than half of the women (n=14) expressed COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy compared to none of the men. Structural factors including hospital tier, unit assignment, and professional role influenced perceived risk of disease exposure and subsequent healthcare worker vaccination decisions. Institutional policies, including mandates and a pro-vaccine environment encouraged vaccination uptake. Healthcare workers reported being more receptive to vaccine messaging that focused on protection from disease, scientific and public health data and their heightened occupational exposure to pathogens.
Despite their medical knowledge, healthcare workers are susceptible to vaccine hesitancy. Strategies to address specific concerns are needed and can be informed by our findings. A flexible and multi-pronged approach that considers individual anxieties, workplace structures, and the need for open communication with tailored messaging is necessary to promote vaccine acceptance in healthcare settings.
Healthcare worker vaccine hesitancy has been associated with many factors including race, gender, age and concerns about vaccine safety. Much of the research on healthcare worker vaccine hesitancy has used surveys and questionnaires giving a broad description of the prevalence and patterns of vaccine hesitancy in the healthcare workforce. This qualitative study examines vaccine behavior (rather than merely intent) through a cross comparison of healthcare workers' experiences and attitudes towards influenza and COVID-19 vaccination. Study findings can be used to help tailor vaccine messaging to hospital healthcare workers which could offset concerns regarding vaccine efficacy and risk, to promote vaccine uptake.
尽管医院医护人员面临感染病毒性呼吸道感染的职业风险更高,但他们对疫苗接种仍存在犹豫。虽然大多数研究使用调查方法来量化医护人员疫苗犹豫的患病率及原因,但本研究采用定性方法来了解他们对流感和新冠疫苗接种的态度和信念。
为了解一线医护人员对流感和新冠疫苗接种的经历和看法,2022年夏秋之际,对从马里兰州两家约翰·霍普金斯医院招募的工作人员进行了30次半结构化访谈。对一位公共卫生受众参与专家进行了深入的关键信息人访谈。访谈进行了录音,并使用NVivo软件(QSR International,澳大利亚墨尔本)进行转录,以进行主题和框架分析。
由于医护人员对该疾病熟悉且认为疾病严重程度较低,他们很少主动寻求流感疫苗信息。约一半(n = 16)的医护人员表示对流感或新冠疫苗没有犹豫。没有医生或医师助理表示有任何疫苗犹豫,而大多数护士表示有一些(n = 10)。超过一半的女性(n = 14)表示对新冠疫苗有犹豫,而男性中无人表示有犹豫。包括医院级别、科室分配和专业角色在内的结构因素影响了对疾病暴露风险的认知以及随后医护人员的疫苗接种决定。包括强制要求和支持疫苗的环境在内的机构政策鼓励了疫苗接种。医护人员表示,他们更容易接受侧重于预防疾病、科学和公共卫生数据以及他们更高的职业病原体暴露风险的疫苗信息。
尽管医护人员具备医学知识,但他们仍容易出现疫苗犹豫。需要制定解决特定担忧的策略,我们的研究结果可为其提供参考。需要一种灵活且多管齐下的方法,考虑个人焦虑、工作场所结构以及通过量身定制的信息进行开放沟通的必要性,以促进医疗机构中的疫苗接种接受度。
医护人员的疫苗犹豫与许多因素有关,包括种族、性别、年龄以及对疫苗安全性的担忧。关于医护人员疫苗犹豫的许多研究使用了调查和问卷,广泛描述了医护人员中疫苗犹豫的患病率和模式。本定性研究通过对医护人员对流感和新冠疫苗接种的经历和态度进行交叉比较,考察了疫苗行为(而非仅仅是意图)。研究结果可用于帮助为医院医护人员量身定制疫苗信息,这可以消除对疫苗效力和风险的担忧,以促进疫苗接种。