• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蛋白质组学分析可改善 Sarculator 列线图对肢体和躯干壁软组织肉瘤的预后风险分层。

Proteomic profiling improves prognostic risk stratification of the Sarculator nomogram in soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities and trunk wall.

机构信息

Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Unit of Biostatistics for Clinical Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2024 Jul;13(14):e70026. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70026.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.70026
PMID:39041188
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11263812/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-risk soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities and trunk wall (eSTS), as defined by the Sarculator nomogram, are more likely to benefit from (neo)adjuvant anthracycline-based therapy compared to low/intermediate-risk patients. The biology underpinning these differential treatment outcomes remain unknown.

METHODS

We analysed proteomic profiles and clinical outcomes of 123 eSTS patients. A Cox model for overall survival including the Sarculator was fitted to individual data to define four risk groups. A DNA replication protein signature-Sarcoma Proteomic Module 6 (SPM6) was evaluated for association with clinicopathological factors and risk groups. SPM6 was added as a covariate together with Sarculator in a multivariable Cox model to assess improvement in prognostic risk stratification.

RESULTS

DNA replication and cell cycle proteins were upregulated in high-risk versus very low-risk patients. Evaluation of the functional effects of CRISPR-Cas9 gene knockdown of proteins enriched in high-risk patients using the cancer cell line encyclopaedia database identified candidate drug targets. SPM6 was significantly associated with tumour malignancy grade (p = 1.6e-06), histology (p = 1.4e-05) and risk groups (p = 2.6e-06). Cox model analysis showed that SPM6 substantially contributed to a better calibration of the Sarculator nomogram (Index of Prediction Accuracy = 0.109 for Sarculator alone versus 0.165 for Sarculator + SPM6).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk stratification of patient with STS is defined by distinct biological pathways across a range of cancer hallmarks. Incorporation of SPM6 protein signature improves prognostic risk stratification of the Sarculator nomogram. This study highlights the utility of integrating protein signatures for the development of next-generation nomograms.

摘要

背景

根据 Sarculator 风险预测图定义的肢体和躯干壁高危软组织肉瘤(eSTS)与低/中危患者相比,更有可能从(新)辅助蒽环类药物治疗中获益。支持这些差异化治疗结果的生物学机制尚不清楚。

方法

我们分析了 123 例 eSTS 患者的蛋白质组学特征和临床结局。使用包括 Sarculator 的 Cox 模型对个体数据进行整体生存分析,以定义四个风险组。评估与临床病理因素和风险组相关的 DNA 复制蛋白标志物-肉瘤蛋白质组模块 6(SPM6)。将 SPM6 与 Sarculator 一起作为协变量添加到多变量 Cox 模型中,以评估其对预后风险分层的改善作用。

结果

与极低危患者相比,高危患者的 DNA 复制和细胞周期蛋白上调。使用癌症细胞系百科全书数据库评估 CRISPR-Cas9 基因敲低富含高危患者的蛋白质的功能效应,确定了候选药物靶点。SPM6 与肿瘤恶性程度(p=1.6e-06)、组织学(p=1.4e-05)和风险组(p=2.6e-06)显著相关。Cox 模型分析表明,SPM6 极大地提高了 Sarculator 预测图的校准度(Sarculator 单独的预测准确性指数为 0.109,而 Sarculator+SPM6 的预测准确性指数为 0.165)。

结论

STS 患者的风险分层由一系列癌症特征的不同生物学途径定义。纳入 SPM6 蛋白特征可改善 Sarculator 预测图的预后风险分层。本研究强调了整合蛋白质特征用于开发下一代预测图的实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edbc/11263812/0e3b8ec3863c/CAM4-13-e70026-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edbc/11263812/c5e86c40c658/CAM4-13-e70026-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edbc/11263812/f6e606c1615a/CAM4-13-e70026-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edbc/11263812/8c35a597407f/CAM4-13-e70026-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edbc/11263812/0e3b8ec3863c/CAM4-13-e70026-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edbc/11263812/c5e86c40c658/CAM4-13-e70026-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edbc/11263812/f6e606c1615a/CAM4-13-e70026-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edbc/11263812/8c35a597407f/CAM4-13-e70026-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edbc/11263812/0e3b8ec3863c/CAM4-13-e70026-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Proteomic profiling improves prognostic risk stratification of the Sarculator nomogram in soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities and trunk wall.蛋白质组学分析可改善 Sarculator 列线图对肢体和躯干壁软组织肉瘤的预后风险分层。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jul;13(14):e70026. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70026.
2
The impact of chemotherapy on survival of patients with extremity and trunk wall soft tissue sarcoma: revisiting the results of the EORTC-STBSG 62931 randomised trial.化疗对肢体和躯干壁软组织肉瘤患者生存的影响:重新审视 EORTC-STBSG 62931 随机试验的结果。
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Mar;109:51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.12.009. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
3
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk soft tissue sarcomas: A Sarculator-based risk stratification analysis of the ISG-STS 1001 randomized trial.高危软组织肉瘤的新辅助化疗:基于 Sarculator 的 ISG-STS 1001 随机试验风险分层分析。
Cancer. 2022 Jan 1;128(1):85-93. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33895. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
4
High-risk soft tissue sarcomas treated with perioperative chemotherapy: Improving prognostic classification in a randomised clinical trial.采用围手术期化疗治疗高危软组织肉瘤:一项随机临床试验中的预后分类改善。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Apr;93:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.01.071. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
5
Risk Stratification Tools to Aid Decisions on Adjuvant Chemotherapy Usage in Resected Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Ten-Year Review of an Irish Sarcoma Center Experience.辅助化疗用于已切除软组织肉瘤的风险分层工具,以辅助决策:爱尔兰肉瘤中心十年经验回顾
World J Oncol. 2024 Aug;15(4):640-647. doi: 10.14740/wjon1863. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
6
Development and external validation of two nomograms to predict overall survival and occurrence of distant metastases in adults after surgical resection of localised soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities: a retrospective analysis.发展和外部验证两种列线图,以预测成人肢体局限性软组织肉瘤手术后的总生存和远处转移发生:回顾性分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 May;17(5):671-80. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00010-3. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
7
Characteristics and Outcomes of Locally Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma After First Relapse in a Single Tertiary Asian Centre and Applicability of the .亚洲某单一三级中心首次复发后局部复发性腹膜后肉瘤的特征及预后,以及(此处原文不完整,无法准确翻译最后部分)的适用性
Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 25;11:730292. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.730292. eCollection 2021.
8
A multi-institutional validation study of prognostic nomograms for retroperitoneal sarcoma.多机构验证研究:腹膜后肉瘤预后列线图。
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;124(5):829-837. doi: 10.1002/jso.26586. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
9
Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Multi-Institutional Validation of Prognostic Nomograms.肢体软组织肉瘤:预后列线图的多机构验证。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 May;29(5):3291-3301. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-11205-5. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
10
Development of nomograms for prognostication of patients with primary soft tissue sarcomas of the trunk and extremity: report from the Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry in Japan.日本骨与软组织肿瘤登记处报告:预测躯干和四肢原发性软组织肉瘤患者预后的列线图的建立。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jul 4;19(1):657. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5875-y.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of the risk prediction models PERSARC and Sarculator in patients with localized soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk wall.肢体和躯干壁局限性软组织肉瘤患者中风险预测模型PERSARC和Sarculator的比较。
ESMO Open. 2025 Jul 24;10(8):105517. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105517.
2
CINSARC and Sarculator in Patients with Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Combined Analysis of Single-Institution Data and the EORTC-STBSG-62092 Trial (STRASS).原发性腹膜后肉瘤患者的CINSARC和Sarculator:单机构数据与EORTC-STBSG-62092试验(STRASS)的联合分析
Clin Cancer Res. 2025 Aug 1;31(15):3239-3248. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-25-0099.

本文引用的文献

1
The proteomic landscape of soft tissue sarcomas.软组织肉瘤的蛋白质组学全景。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jun 29;14(1):3834. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39486-2.
2
Staging Systems and Nomograms for Soft Tissue Sarcoma.软组织肉瘤的分期系统和列线图。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Mar 26;30(4):3648-3671. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30040278.
3
Doxorubicin-An Agent with Multiple Mechanisms of Anticancer Activity.多柔比星——一种具有多种抗癌活性机制的药物。
Cells. 2023 Feb 19;12(4):659. doi: 10.3390/cells12040659.
4
Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and a New Inflammatory Biomarkers Prognostic Index for Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Retrospective Monocentric Study.术前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及一种用于原发性腹膜后肉瘤的新型炎症生物标志物预后指数:回顾性单中心研究
Clin Cancer Res. 2023 Feb 1;29(3):614-620. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-2897.
5
Evaluation of the role of KPNA2 mutations in breast cancer prognosis using bioinformatics datasets.基于生物信息数据集评估 KPNA2 突变在乳腺癌预后中的作用。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Aug 10;22(1):874. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09969-4.
6
CINSARC in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Results from the ISG-STS 1001 study.CINSARC 在接受新辅助化疗的高危软组织肉瘤患者中的应用:来自 ISG-STS 1001 研究的结果。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(2):1350-1357. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5015. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
7
ENO1 and Cancer.烯醇化酶1与癌症
Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2022 Jan 3;24:288-298. doi: 10.1016/j.omto.2021.12.026. eCollection 2022 Mar 17.
8
Sarculator is a Good Model to Predict Survival in Resected Extremity and Trunk Sarcomas in US Patients.Sarculator是预测美国患者肢体和躯干肉瘤切除术后生存率的良好模型。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Feb 27. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11442-2.
9
Proteomic and Metabolomic Profiling in Soft Tissue Sarcomas.软组织肉瘤的蛋白质组学和代谢组学分析。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):78-88. doi: 10.1007/s11864-022-00947-3. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
10
Gene expression profiling improves prognostication by nomogram in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas.基因表达谱分析通过列线图改善软组织肉瘤患者的预后评估。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2022 Jun;42(6):563-566. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12268. Epub 2022 Feb 7.