• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国六种常见癌症存活率的社会经济差异:基于人群的回顾性队列研究。

Socioeconomic Disparities in Six Common Cancer Survival Rates in South Korea: Population-Wide Retrospective Cohort Study.

机构信息

National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.

Department of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jul 22;10:e55011. doi: 10.2196/55011.

DOI:10.2196/55011
PMID:39041282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11284611/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In South Korea, the cancer incidence rate has increased by 56.5% from 2001 to 2021. Nevertheless, the 5-year cancer survival rate from 2017 to 2021 increased by 17.9% compared with that from 2001 to 2005. Cancer survival rates tend to decline with lower socioeconomic status, and variations exist in the survival rates among different cancer types. Analyzing socioeconomic patterns in the survival of patients with cancer can help identify high-risk groups and ensure that they benefit from interventions.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze differences in survival rates among patients diagnosed with six types of cancer-stomach, colorectal, liver, breast, cervical, and lung cancers-based on socioeconomic status using Korean nationwide data.

METHODS

This study used the Korea Central Cancer Registry database linked to the National Health Information Database to follow up with patients diagnosed with cancer between 2014 and 2018 until December 31, 2021. Kaplan-Meier curves stratified by income status were generated, and log-rank tests were conducted for each cancer type to assess statistical significance. Hazard ratios with 95% CIs for any cause of overall survival were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression models with the time since diagnosis.

RESULTS

The survival rates for the six different types of cancer were as follows: stomach cancer, 69.6% (96,404/138,462); colorectal cancer, 66.6% (83,406/125,156); liver cancer, 33.7% (23,860/70,712); lung cancer, 30.4% (33,203/109,116); breast cancer, 91.5% (90,730/99,159); and cervical cancer, 78% (12,930/16,580). When comparing the medical aid group to the highest income group, the hazard ratios were 1.72 (95% CI 1.66-1.79) for stomach cancer, 1.60 (95% CI 1.54-1.56) for colorectal cancer, 1.51 (95% CI 1.45-1.56) for liver cancer, 1.56 (95% CI 1.51-1.59) for lung cancer, 2.19 (95% CI 2.01-2.38) for breast cancer, and 1.65 (95% CI 1.46-1.87) for cervical cancer. A higher deprivation index and advanced diagnostic stage were associated with an increased risk of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomic status significantly mediates disparities in cancer survival in several cancer types. This effect is particularly pronounced in less fatal cancers such as breast cancer. Therefore, considering the type of cancer and socioeconomic factors, social and medical interventions such as early cancer detection and appropriate treatment are necessary for vulnerable populations.

摘要

背景

在韩国,2001 年至 2021 年期间,癌症发病率增长了 56.5%。然而,2017 年至 2021 年的 5 年癌症生存率与 2001 年至 2005 年相比增长了 17.9%。癌症生存率往往随社会经济地位降低而下降,不同癌症类型之间的生存率也存在差异。分析癌症患者的社会经济模式生存情况有助于确定高危人群,并确保他们受益于干预措施。

目的

本研究旨在使用韩国全国数据,根据社会经济状况,分析六种癌症(胃癌、结直肠癌、肝癌、乳腺癌、宫颈癌和肺癌)患者生存率的差异。

方法

本研究使用韩国中央癌症登记数据库与国家健康信息数据库进行关联,对 2014 年至 2018 年期间诊断为癌症的患者进行随访,随访时间截至 2021 年 12 月 31 日。根据收入状况生成 Kaplan-Meier 曲线,并对每种癌症类型进行对数秩检验,以评估统计学意义。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型计算任何原因导致的总生存的风险比及其 95%置信区间,时间起点为诊断时间。

结果

六种不同类型癌症的生存率如下:胃癌,69.6%(96,404/138,462);结直肠癌,66.6%(83,406/125,156);肝癌,33.7%(23,860/70,712);肺癌,30.4%(33,203/109,116);乳腺癌,91.5%(90,730/99,159);宫颈癌,78%(12,930/16,580)。与最高收入组相比,医疗救助组的风险比分别为胃癌 1.72(95%CI 1.66-1.79)、结直肠癌 1.60(95%CI 1.54-1.56)、肝癌 1.51(95%CI 1.45-1.56)、肺癌 1.56(95%CI 1.51-1.59)、乳腺癌 2.19(95%CI 2.01-2.38)和宫颈癌 1.65(95%CI 1.46-1.87)。剥夺指数较高和诊断较晚与死亡率增加相关。

结论

社会经济地位显著影响多种癌症的生存差异。这种影响在乳腺癌等致死率较低的癌症中更为明显。因此,考虑到癌症类型和社会经济因素,需要对弱势群体进行早期癌症检测和适当治疗等社会和医疗干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9e3/11284611/cd1c5370c9e3/publichealth-v10-e55011-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9e3/11284611/cd1c5370c9e3/publichealth-v10-e55011-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9e3/11284611/cd1c5370c9e3/publichealth-v10-e55011-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic Disparities in Six Common Cancer Survival Rates in South Korea: Population-Wide Retrospective Cohort Study.韩国六种常见癌症存活率的社会经济差异:基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jul 22;10:e55011. doi: 10.2196/55011.
2
Social Inequities in the Survival of Liver Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Korea, 2007-2017.社会不平等对肝癌生存率的影响:韩国 2007-2017 年全国队列研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Apr 1;39(12):e130. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e130.
3
Italian cancer figures--Report 2015: The burden of rare cancers in Italy.意大利癌症数据——2015年报告:意大利罕见癌症的负担
Epidemiol Prev. 2016 Jan-Feb;40(1 Suppl 2):1-120. doi: 10.19191/EP16.1S2.P001.035.
4
Inequalities in cancer incidence and mortality across income groups and policy implications in South Korea.韩国不同收入群体间癌症发病率和死亡率的不平等现象及政策影响
Public Health. 2008 Mar;122(3):229-36. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.07.003. Epub 2007 Nov 1.
5
Disparities by Age, Sex, Tumor Stage, Diagnosis Path, and Area-level Socioeconomic Status in Survival Time for Major Cancers: Results from the Busan Cancer Registry.主要癌症生存时间的年龄、性别、肿瘤分期、诊断路径和地区社会经济地位差异:釜山市癌症登记处的结果。
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Dec;32(12):1974-1983. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.12.1974.
6
Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study.社会经济地位对癌症发病率及诊断时分期的影响:来自监测、流行病学及最终结果:国家纵向死亡率研究的选定发现
Cancer Causes Control. 2009 May;20(4):417-35. doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9256-0. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
7
Inequality in Mortality and Cardiovascular Risk Among Young, Low-Income, Self-Employed Workers: Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.年轻人、低收入、自营职业者的死亡率和心血管风险的不平等:全国回顾性队列研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Sep 20;10:e48047. doi: 10.2196/48047.
8
Difference of stage at cancer diagnosis by socioeconomic status for four target cancers of the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea: Results from the Gwangju and Jeonnam cancer registries.韩国国家癌症筛查计划中四种目标癌症按社会经济地位划分的癌症诊断阶段差异:光州和全南癌症登记处的结果。
J Epidemiol. 2017 Jul;27(7):299-304. doi: 10.1016/j.je.2016.07.004. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
9
Contribution of income-related inequality and healthcare utilisation to survival in cancers of the lung, liver, stomach and colon.收入相关不平等和医疗保健利用对肺癌、肝癌、胃癌和结肠癌患者生存的影响。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Jan;66(1):37-40. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.104554. Epub 2010 Oct 19.
10
Social Inequalities in Cancer Survival in Belgium: A Population-Based Cohort Study.比利时癌症生存中的社会不平等:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Jan;30(1):45-52. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0721. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived economic pressure and health-related quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer after surgery: Evidence from China.结直肠癌患者术后感知到的经济压力与健康相关生活质量:来自中国的证据
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Jun;14(6):2131-2137. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1344_24. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
2
Outcomes for Medicaid Patients with Colorectal Cancer Are Improved in Affluent Neighborhoods, but Disparities Persist.在富裕社区,医疗补助计划覆盖的结直肠癌患者的治疗效果有所改善,但差距依然存在。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 22;17(9):1399. doi: 10.3390/cancers17091399.
3
Lung Cancer Risk in Female School Cooks: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study in the Republic of Korea.

本文引用的文献

1
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.2022 年全球癌症统计数据:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率全球估计数。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
2
Impact of health disparities on national breast cancer screening participation rates in South Korea.健康差距对韩国国家乳腺癌筛查参与率的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 14;13(1):13172. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40164-y.
3
Area-level Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Cancer Survival in Metropolitan Detroit.
韩国女校厨患肺癌风险:一项全国性回顾性队列研究
Saf Health Work. 2025 Mar;16(1):105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2025.01.002. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
4
Impact of Small Area Level Deprivation on Colorectal Cancer Survival: Findings from the Regional Cancer Registry in Korea.小区域层面的贫困对结直肠癌生存的影响:来自韩国区域癌症登记处的研究结果
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 7;17(4):567. doi: 10.3390/cancers17040567.
5
Disparities in Overall Survival Rates for Cancers across Income Levels in the Republic of Korea.韩国不同收入水平人群癌症总体生存率的差异。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 22;16(16):2923. doi: 10.3390/cancers16162923.
大都市底特律的地区社会经济劣势与癌症生存
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Mar 6;32(3):387-397. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0738.
4
Socioeconomic disparities in cancer survival: Relation to stage at diagnosis, treatment, and centralization of patients to accredited hospitals, 2005-2014, Japan.癌症生存率的社会经济差异:与诊断时的分期、治疗以及患者向认证医院集中的关系,2005-2014 年,日本。
Cancer Med. 2023 Mar;12(5):6077-6091. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5332. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
5
Health insurance status and cancer stage at diagnosis and survival in the United States.美国的健康保险状况与诊断时的癌症分期和生存情况。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Nov;72(6):542-560. doi: 10.3322/caac.21732. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
6
Effect of colorectal cancer screening on long-term survival of colorectal cancer patients: Results of the Korea National Cancer Screening Program.结直肠癌筛查对结直肠癌患者长期生存的影响:韩国国家癌症筛查计划的结果。
Int J Cancer. 2022 Jun 15;150(12):1958-1967. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33953. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
7
Neighborhood and Individual Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Survival Among Patients With Nonmetastatic Common Cancers.社区和个体社会经济劣势与非转移性常见癌症患者的生存。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2139593. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.39593.
8
American Cancer Society's report on the status of cancer disparities in the United States, 2021.美国癌症协会关于 2021 年美国癌症差异状况的报告。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Mar;72(2):112-143. doi: 10.3322/caac.21703. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
9
Medical service utilization and out-of-pocket spending among near-poor National Health Insurance members in South Korea.韩国国民健康保险接近贫困人群的医疗服务利用和自付支出。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 28;21(1):886. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06881-8.
10
Effectiveness of the Korean National Cancer Screening Program in reducing breast cancer mortality.韩国国家癌症筛查计划在降低乳腺癌死亡率方面的有效性。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021 Jun 28;7(1):83. doi: 10.1038/s41523-021-00295-9.