Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Soc Stud Sci. 2024 Dec;54(6):805-835. doi: 10.1177/03063127241261376. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
STS theories of biocapital conceptualize how biomedical knowledge and capital form together. Though these formations of biocapital often are located in large urban centers, few scholars have attended to how they are transforming urban spaces and places. In this paper we argue that the twinned technological development of cells and cities concentrates economic and symbolic capital and sets in motion contentious practices we name . We draw on archival research and a nearly decade-long ethnography of the expansion of biomedical campuses in a major American city to show how the speculative logics of land development and biomedical innovation become bound together in a process we describe as . We examine how the logics of speculative revitalization imagine a future in which cities and biomedicine produce wealth and health harmoniously together. However, in practice-as buildings of new biomedical urban campuses get built-the dreams of billionaire philanthrocapitalists to create global cities clash with the plans of biomedical researchers to create global health. We document the reproduction of stratified and racialized biomedical exclusions that result while also highlighting the unlikely opportunities for creating alliances committed to creating equitable biomedical research and healthcare in urban communities.
STS 理论将生物资本概念化为生物医学知识和资本是如何结合在一起的。尽管生物资本的这些形成通常位于大型城市中心,但很少有学者关注它们是如何改变城市空间和场所的。在本文中,我们认为细胞和城市的双重技术发展集中了经济和象征资本,并引发了我们称之为“生物城市”的争议性实践。我们利用档案研究和对美国一个主要城市生物医学校园扩张的近十年民族志研究,展示了土地开发和生物医学创新的投机逻辑是如何在一个我们称之为“生物城市投机”的过程中结合在一起的。我们研究了投机振兴的逻辑是如何想象一个城市和生物医学和谐地创造财富和健康的未来的。然而,在实践中——随着新的生物医学城市校园的建筑的建成——亿万富翁慈善资本主义者创造全球城市的梦想与生物医学研究人员创造全球健康的计划发生了冲突。我们记录了由此产生的分层和种族化的生物医学排斥现象的再现,同时也强调了在城市社区中建立致力于创造公平的生物医学研究和医疗保健的联盟的难得机会。