Suh Pae Sun, Baek Jung Hwan, Lee Jae Ho, Chung Sae Rom, Choi Young Jun, Chung Ki-Wook, Kim Tae Yong, Lee Jeong Hyun
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eur Radiol. 2025 Feb;35(2):597-607. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10977-0. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
To compare microvascular flow imaging (MVFI) and power Doppler ultrasonography imaging (PDUS) for detecting intratumoral vascularity in recurrent thyroid cancer both before and after radiofrequency ablation (RFA).
This retrospective study included 80 patients (age, 57 ± 12 years; 54 women) with 110 recurrent tumors who underwent RFA between January 2021 and June 2023. A total of 151 PDUS and MVFI image sets were analyzed (85 pre-RFA, 66 post-RFA). Two readers assessed vascularity on the images using a four-point scale with a 2-week interval between PDUS and MVFI to estimate inter-reader agreement. Intra-reader agreement was determined by reinterpreting images in reverse order (MVFI-PDUS) after a 1-month gap. Additionally, diagnostic performance for identifying viable tumors after RFA was assessed in 44 lesions using thyroid-protocol CT as a reference standard.
MVFI demonstrated higher vascular grades than PDUS, both before (reader 1: 3.04 ± 1.15 vs. 1.93 ± 1.07, p < 0.001; reader 2: 3.20 ± 0.96 vs. 2.12 ± 1.07, p < 0.001) and after RFA (reader 1: 2.44 ± 1.28 vs. 1.67 ± 1.06, p < 0.001; reader 2: 2.62 ± 1.23 vs. 1.83 ± 0.99, p < 0.001). Inter-reader agreement was substantial (κ = 0.743) and intra-reader agreement was almost perfect (κ = 0.840). MVFI showed higher sensitivity (81.5%-88.9%) and accuracy (84.1%-86.4%) than PDUS (sensitivity: 51.9%, p < 0.01; accuracy: 63.6-70.5%, p < 0.04), without sacrificing specificity.
MVFI was superior to PDUS for assessing intratumoral vascularity and showed good inter- and intra-reader agreement, highlighting its clinical value for assessing pre-RFA vascularity and accurately identifying post-RFA viable tumors in recurrent thyroid cancer.
Microvascular flow imaging (MVFI) is superior to power-Doppler US for assessing intratumoral vascularity; therefore, MVFI can be a valuable tool for assessing vascularity before radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and for identifying viable tumors after RFA in patients with recurrent thyroid cancer.
The value of microvascular flow imaging (MVFI) for evaluating intratumoral vascularity is unexplored. MVFI demonstrated higher vascular grades than power Doppler US before and after ablation. Microvascular flow imaging showed higher sensitivity and accuracy than power Doppler US without sacrificing specificity.
比较微血管血流成像(MVFI)和能量多普勒超声成像(PDUS)在射频消融(RFA)前后检测复发性甲状腺癌肿瘤内血管的情况。
这项回顾性研究纳入了2021年1月至2023年6月期间接受RFA的80例患者(年龄57±12岁;54例女性),共110个复发性肿瘤。总共分析了151套PDUS和MVFI图像集(85套RFA前,66套RFA后)。两名阅片者使用四点量表评估图像上的血管情况,PDUS和MVFI之间间隔2周以评估阅片者间的一致性。阅片者内一致性通过在间隔1个月后以相反顺序(MVFI-PDUS)重新解读图像来确定。此外,以甲状腺协议CT作为参考标准,对44个病灶评估RFA后识别存活肿瘤的诊断性能。
MVFI显示的血管分级高于PDUS,RFA前(阅片者1:3.04±1.15对1.93±1.07,p<0.001;阅片者2:3.20±0.96对2.12±1.07,p<0.001)和RFA后(阅片者1:2.44±1.28对1.67±1.06,p<0.001;阅片者2:2.62±1.23对1.83±0.99,p<0.001)均如此。阅片者间一致性良好(κ=0.743),阅片者内一致性几乎完美(κ=0.840)。MVFI显示出比PDUS更高的敏感性(81.5%-88.9%)和准确性(84.1%-86.4%)(敏感性:51.9%,p<0.01;准确性:63.6-70.5%,p<0.04),且不牺牲特异性。
MVFI在评估肿瘤内血管方面优于PDUS,阅片者间和阅片者内一致性良好,突出了其在评估复发性甲状腺癌RFA前血管情况及准确识别RFA后存活肿瘤方面的临床价值。
微血管血流成像(MVFI)在评估肿瘤内血管方面优于能量多普勒超声;因此,MVFI可成为评估复发性甲状腺癌患者射频消融(RFA)前血管情况及识别RFA后存活肿瘤的有价值工具。
微血管血流成像(MVFI)评估肿瘤内血管的价值尚未得到探索。MVFI在消融前后显示的血管分级高于能量多普勒超声。微血管血流成像显示出比能量多普勒超声更高的敏感性和准确性,且不牺牲特异性。