Department of Ultrasound, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
School of Medicine, Nankai University, 94 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, China.
BMC Med Imaging. 2021 Nov 22;21(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12880-021-00697-y.
To evaluate the correlation and agreement between superb micro-vascular imaging (SMI) mode and the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) mode for the ablative completeness and the volumes of ablation lesions to determine the clinical application value of SMI in follow-up after radiofrequency ablation.
From April 2020 to June 2020, two radiologists used SMI and CEUS mode to measure the volume of the ablation lesion. We use intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), scatter plots and Bland-Altman plots to evaluate the correlation and agreement of the two techniques. In addition, intra- and inter-observer reliability in volume measurement of ablation lesions with SMI mode was assessed.
SMI mode and CEUS mode have good agreement in the evaluation of ablative completeness. The ICC was 0.876 and 0.928 of reader A and reader B between SMI mode and CEUS mode in terms of ablation lesions volume measurement. There was a strong correlation between the two modes in both reader A and reader B (r = 0.808; r = 0.882). The ICC was 0.836 for the inter-observer reliability of SMI technique. The scatter plot showed a good linear relation (r = 0.715). In the Bland-Altman plot, 4.35% (1/23) of the points was outside the 95% limits of agreement. The ICC was 0.965 for the intra-observer reliability of SMI technique, the scatter plot also showed a strong linear correlation (r = 0.965). In the Bland-Altman plot, 8.70% (2/23) of the points was outside the 95% limits of agreement.
SMI and CEUS have good agreement and correlation in the ablation volume measurement. SMI technology is expected to be applied as an alternative to CEUS in the clinical follow-up of ablation lesions.
评估超微血流成像(SMI)模式与对比增强超声(CEUS)模式在消融完整性和消融病灶体积方面的相关性和一致性,以确定 SMI 在射频消融后随访中的临床应用价值。
本研究于 2020 年 4 月至 6 月期间,由两位放射科医生分别采用 SMI 和 CEUS 模式对消融病灶体积进行测量,使用组内相关系数(ICC)、散点图和 Bland-Altman 图评估两种技术的相关性和一致性。此外,还评估了 SMI 模式下消融病灶体积测量的观察者内和观察者间的可靠性。
SMI 模式和 CEUS 模式在评估消融完整性方面具有良好的一致性。读者 A 和读者 B 采用 SMI 模式和 CEUS 模式评估消融病灶体积时,ICC 分别为 0.876 和 0.928。两种模式在读者 A 和读者 B 之间均具有较强的相关性(r=0.808;r=0.882)。SMI 技术的观察者间可靠性 ICC 为 0.836。散点图显示出良好的线性关系(r=0.715)。Bland-Altman 图中,95%一致性界限外的点有 4.35%(1/23)。SMI 技术的观察者内可靠性 ICC 为 0.965,散点图也显示出较强的线性相关性(r=0.965)。Bland-Altman 图中,95%一致性界限外的点有 8.70%(2/23)。
SMI 和 CEUS 在消融体积测量方面具有良好的一致性和相关性。SMI 技术有望作为 CEUS 的替代方法应用于消融病灶的临床随访中。