Department of Radiotherapy, ShuGuang Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Shanghai University of Chinese Traditional Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Radiotherapy, Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:15330338241263026. doi: 10.1177/15330338241263026.
This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of Endostar in the management of locally advanced cervical cancer.
This retrospective, 2-center study enrolled 41 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer between June 2017 and December 2020. The patients were subjected to a combination of Endostar and chemoradiotherapy until they experienced disease progression or an unacceptable level of toxicity. The patients in the Endostar combined chemoradiotherapy (E + CRT) and CRT groups were matched 1:1 based on clinical features, including age, disease stage, and pathological type. The therapeutic efficacy and safety outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.
Early treatment response: the CR rates in E + CRT and CRT groups were 48.8% and 26.8%, respectively ( = 4.20, < .05). The ORR and DCR were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Long-term efficacy: there was no significant difference in the 1-year and 2-year PFS rates and OS rates between 2 groups. However, in patients with stage IIB, subgroup analyses revealed a significant difference in PFS between the 2 groups (< .05). Prognostic factors: stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, and tumor size were independent predictive factors for PFS, while ECOG score and tumor size were those of OS in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Safety: The incidence of grade III-IV myelosuppression was significantly lower in E + CRT group than in CRT group (< .05).
The combination of Endostar and concurrent CRT exhibited greater efficacy in treating locally advanced cervical cancer with no severe adverse reactions, when compared to simple CRT. It is expected that this approach will evolve into a new treatment alternative for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
本研究旨在评估恩度联合放化疗治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的疗效和安全性。
这是一项回顾性、双中心研究,纳入了 2017 年 6 月至 2020 年 12 月期间 41 例局部晚期宫颈癌患者。这些患者接受恩度联合放化疗治疗,直至疾病进展或出现无法耐受的毒性。根据年龄、疾病分期和病理类型等临床特征,将恩度联合放化疗(E+CRT)组和单纯放化疗(CRT)组的患者进行 1:1 匹配。比较两组患者的疗效和安全性。
早期治疗反应:E+CRT 组和 CRT 组的完全缓解率(CR)分别为 48.8%和 26.8%( = 4.20,<.05)。两组的客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)无显著差异。长期疗效:两组患者的 1 年和 2 年无进展生存率(PFS)和总生存率(OS)无显著差异。然而,在ⅡB 期患者亚组分析中,两组患者的 PFS 差异有统计学意义(<.05)。预后因素:分期、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分和肿瘤大小是 PFS 的独立预测因素,而 ECOG 评分和肿瘤大小是 OS 的预测因素。安全性:E+CRT 组骨髓抑制发生率(III-IV 级)明显低于 CRT 组(<.05)。
恩度联合放化疗治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的疗效优于单纯放化疗,且无严重不良反应。预计这种方法将成为局部晚期宫颈癌患者的一种新的治疗选择。