School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Department of Social Work and Social Administration, Sau Po Center on Ageing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Department of Social Work and Social Administration, Sau Po Center on Ageing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Oct;158:104848. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104848. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
Being the backbone of informal care for people living with dementia, caregivers suffer overwhelming physical and psychological challenges in their daily caregiving experience. Proactive coping strategies to alleviate the caregiving burden are of utmost importance. Meaning-making emerges as an effective coping approach to benefit caregivers and mitigate their care burden. However, the conceptualisation of meaning-making on its dimensions and process has been ambiguously identified.
To synthesise the qualitative research evidence on meaning-making in a dementia context to identify: (1) the situational dimension in making sense of caregiving scenarios, and (2) how the meaning-making process evolves during dementia caregiving.
This systematic review identified 62 qualitative studies published between 1969 and 2022 from the major databases. Eligible studies met the following inclusion criteria: (1) having informal caregivers of people living with dementia; (2) involving meaning-making of care experience; (3) adopting qualitative design; and (4) full-text of research articles. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Clinical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. By using Qualitative Evidence Synthesis, themes relevant to critical dimensions and phases of meaning-making were generated from the extracted data.
Sixty-two studies involving 2487 subjects were synthesised investigating the critical dimensions and process of meaning-making of dementia care experience. Results indicated that the dementia care experience can be made sense of in several folds: (1) it involved complicated demands from people living with dementia and requires customised care; (2) the dynamics of dyadic interactions with dilemma and ambivalence; and (3) adaptive coping encapsulating perceptions of loss and growth, complied and integrated values, balanced expectations of care and self, and improvement in self-efficacy. The meaning-making process underwent phases of meaning creation (meaning created in initial encounter with dementia symptoms), meaning appraisal (assimilation and accommodation pathways for appraisal), and meaning adherence (integration of the appraised meanings).
Findings suggest meaning-making of dementia caregiving is a multi-faceted and multi-phased recursive process. Future implications give directions on the facilitation of meaning-oriented interventions to enhance the awareness of caregiving role and the knowledge of dementia care, learn techniques of reframing and restructuring, and seek meaningful perspectives; and to adopt strategies to overcome the barriers for meaning-making by empowering self-identity, roles and expectations, and the dyadic relationship. In addition, our findings inform future advancement in the conceptualisation and measurement of meaning-making in the context of family caregiving. Optimisation of the meaning-making process inspires professional assistance to enhance caregivers' coping for dementia care experience.
作为照顾痴呆症患者的非正规护理的中坚力量,护理人员在日常护理工作中承受着巨大的身心挑战。采取积极的应对策略来减轻护理负担至关重要。赋予意义是一种有益于护理人员并减轻其护理负担的有效应对方式。然而,对于赋予意义的维度和过程的概念化一直存在模糊不清的情况。
综合痴呆症背景下有关赋予意义的定性研究证据,以确定:(1) 在理解护理情景方面的情境维度,以及 (2) 在痴呆症护理过程中意义的形成过程。
本系统综述从主要数据库中确定了 1969 年至 2022 年期间发表的 62 项定性研究。符合条件的研究符合以下纳入标准:(1) 有痴呆症患者的非正规护理人员;(2) 涉及护理体验的意义赋予;(3) 采用定性设计;以及 (4) 研究文章的全文。使用临床评估技能计划清单评估偏倚风险。通过使用定性证据综合,从提取的数据中生成与意义形成的关键维度和阶段相关的主题。
综合了 62 项研究,涉及 2487 名受试者,这些研究调查了痴呆症护理体验的关键维度和意义形成过程。结果表明,痴呆症护理体验可以从几个方面来理解:(1) 它涉及到痴呆症患者的复杂需求,需要定制护理;(2) 与困境和矛盾的二元互动的动态;以及 (3) 包含对损失和成长、综合价值观、平衡的护理和自我期望、以及自我效能感的感知的适应性应对。意义形成过程经历了意义创造阶段(在最初遇到痴呆症症状时创造意义)、意义评估阶段(同化和适应途径进行评估)和意义坚持阶段(评估意义的整合)。
研究结果表明,痴呆症护理的意义赋予是一个多方面和多阶段的循环过程。未来的影响指明了促进以意义为导向的干预措施的方向,以提高对护理角色和痴呆症护理知识的认识,学习重新构建和重构的技巧,并寻求有意义的观点;并采取策略克服意义形成的障碍,通过增强自我认同、角色和期望以及二元关系来实现。此外,我们的研究结果为家庭护理背景下赋予意义的概念化和测量提供了新的思路。优化意义形成过程可以激发专业人员的帮助,以增强护理人员对痴呆症护理体验的应对能力。