• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痴呆症护理的意义构建:定性研究的系统评价。

Meaning-making of dementia caregiving: A systematic review of qualitative studies.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Department of Social Work and Social Administration, Sau Po Center on Ageing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Department of Social Work and Social Administration, Sau Po Center on Ageing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Oct;158:104848. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104848. Epub 2024 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104848
PMID:39043114
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Being the backbone of informal care for people living with dementia, caregivers suffer overwhelming physical and psychological challenges in their daily caregiving experience. Proactive coping strategies to alleviate the caregiving burden are of utmost importance. Meaning-making emerges as an effective coping approach to benefit caregivers and mitigate their care burden. However, the conceptualisation of meaning-making on its dimensions and process has been ambiguously identified.

OBJECTIVES

To synthesise the qualitative research evidence on meaning-making in a dementia context to identify: (1) the situational dimension in making sense of caregiving scenarios, and (2) how the meaning-making process evolves during dementia caregiving.

METHODS

This systematic review identified 62 qualitative studies published between 1969 and 2022 from the major databases. Eligible studies met the following inclusion criteria: (1) having informal caregivers of people living with dementia; (2) involving meaning-making of care experience; (3) adopting qualitative design; and (4) full-text of research articles. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Clinical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. By using Qualitative Evidence Synthesis, themes relevant to critical dimensions and phases of meaning-making were generated from the extracted data.

RESULTS

Sixty-two studies involving 2487 subjects were synthesised investigating the critical dimensions and process of meaning-making of dementia care experience. Results indicated that the dementia care experience can be made sense of in several folds: (1) it involved complicated demands from people living with dementia and requires customised care; (2) the dynamics of dyadic interactions with dilemma and ambivalence; and (3) adaptive coping encapsulating perceptions of loss and growth, complied and integrated values, balanced expectations of care and self, and improvement in self-efficacy. The meaning-making process underwent phases of meaning creation (meaning created in initial encounter with dementia symptoms), meaning appraisal (assimilation and accommodation pathways for appraisal), and meaning adherence (integration of the appraised meanings).

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest meaning-making of dementia caregiving is a multi-faceted and multi-phased recursive process. Future implications give directions on the facilitation of meaning-oriented interventions to enhance the awareness of caregiving role and the knowledge of dementia care, learn techniques of reframing and restructuring, and seek meaningful perspectives; and to adopt strategies to overcome the barriers for meaning-making by empowering self-identity, roles and expectations, and the dyadic relationship. In addition, our findings inform future advancement in the conceptualisation and measurement of meaning-making in the context of family caregiving. Optimisation of the meaning-making process inspires professional assistance to enhance caregivers' coping for dementia care experience.

摘要

背景

作为照顾痴呆症患者的非正规护理的中坚力量,护理人员在日常护理工作中承受着巨大的身心挑战。采取积极的应对策略来减轻护理负担至关重要。赋予意义是一种有益于护理人员并减轻其护理负担的有效应对方式。然而,对于赋予意义的维度和过程的概念化一直存在模糊不清的情况。

目的

综合痴呆症背景下有关赋予意义的定性研究证据,以确定:(1) 在理解护理情景方面的情境维度,以及 (2) 在痴呆症护理过程中意义的形成过程。

方法

本系统综述从主要数据库中确定了 1969 年至 2022 年期间发表的 62 项定性研究。符合条件的研究符合以下纳入标准:(1) 有痴呆症患者的非正规护理人员;(2) 涉及护理体验的意义赋予;(3) 采用定性设计;以及 (4) 研究文章的全文。使用临床评估技能计划清单评估偏倚风险。通过使用定性证据综合,从提取的数据中生成与意义形成的关键维度和阶段相关的主题。

结果

综合了 62 项研究,涉及 2487 名受试者,这些研究调查了痴呆症护理体验的关键维度和意义形成过程。结果表明,痴呆症护理体验可以从几个方面来理解:(1) 它涉及到痴呆症患者的复杂需求,需要定制护理;(2) 与困境和矛盾的二元互动的动态;以及 (3) 包含对损失和成长、综合价值观、平衡的护理和自我期望、以及自我效能感的感知的适应性应对。意义形成过程经历了意义创造阶段(在最初遇到痴呆症症状时创造意义)、意义评估阶段(同化和适应途径进行评估)和意义坚持阶段(评估意义的整合)。

结论

研究结果表明,痴呆症护理的意义赋予是一个多方面和多阶段的循环过程。未来的影响指明了促进以意义为导向的干预措施的方向,以提高对护理角色和痴呆症护理知识的认识,学习重新构建和重构的技巧,并寻求有意义的观点;并采取策略克服意义形成的障碍,通过增强自我认同、角色和期望以及二元关系来实现。此外,我们的研究结果为家庭护理背景下赋予意义的概念化和测量提供了新的思路。优化意义形成过程可以激发专业人员的帮助,以增强护理人员对痴呆症护理体验的应对能力。

相似文献

1
Meaning-making of dementia caregiving: A systematic review of qualitative studies.痴呆症护理的意义构建:定性研究的系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Oct;158:104848. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104848. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
2
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
3
Unravelling positive aspects of caregiving in dementia: An integrative review of research literature.解析痴呆症护理中的积极方面:研究文献的综合回顾。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Mar;79:1-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
4
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
5
Interventions to build resilience in family caregivers of people living with dementia: a comprehensive systematic review.增强痴呆症患者家庭照料者复原力的干预措施:一项全面的系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Jun;14(6):238-73. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-002555.
6
The meaningfulness of participating in support groups for informal caregivers of older adults with dementia: a systematic review.参与老年痴呆症患者非正式照料者支持小组的意义:一项系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jul 17;13(6):373-433. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2121.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
A qualitative systematic review of the role of families in supporting communication in people with dementia.一项关于家庭在支持痴呆症患者沟通方面作用的定性系统评价。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Sep;57(5):1130-1153. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12738. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.

引用本文的文献

1
Reflecting upon Session 8 of the 2023 dementia care summit: Diversity beyond outreach, recruitment, and retention.反思2023年痴呆症护理峰会的第八场会议:超越外展、招募和留用的多样性。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Sep;21(9):e70661. doi: 10.1002/alz.70661.
2
A qualitative study on the subjective experience of prolonged care among family members of patients with moderate to severe dementia.一项关于中重度痴呆患者家属长期护理主观体验的定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Apr 29;24(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01738-x.