Department of Psychology, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), 76829 Landau, Germany.
Department of Psychology, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), 76829 Landau, Germany; Center for Research on Individual Development and Adaptive Education of Children at Risk (IDeA), DIPF | Leipniz Institute for Research and Information in Education, 60323 Frankfurt, Germany.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Oct;246:106014. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106014. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
The timing of structural changes in executive functions (EFs) across development is a matter of controversy; whereas some studies suggest a uniform structure of EFs in early childhood, findings in middle and late childhood are mixed. There are results indicating uniformity of EFs as well as several studies suggesting multidimensionality of the construct. In addition, studies demonstrate an age-related differentiation of the relation between EFs and intelligence. We conducted a comparative analysis of the EF structure and relations with fluid intelligence in two distinct age groups. A sample of n = 145 preschool children (5.2-6.7 years of age) and n = 109 elementary school children (8.8-11.8 years) completed measures of working memory, inhibition, cognitive flexibility, and fluid intelligence. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed that a single-factor model best represented performance on EF tasks in both preschool and elementary school children. Multi-group CFA indicated equivalent and strong relations between EFs and intelligence across both age groups (r = .64 in preschool and elementary school children). Our results confirm that EFs are significantly related to fluid intelligence but might not underlie a uniform pattern of successive differentiation into multiple EF components in childhood. We discuss how methodological artifacts such as simultaneous interference might have contributed to previous findings on differentiation in middle and late childhood.
执行功能(EFs)结构在发展过程中的变化时间一直存在争议;虽然一些研究表明幼儿期 EFs 具有统一的结构,但在儿童中期和晚期的研究结果则较为复杂。有些研究结果表明 EFs 具有一致性,而另一些研究则表明该结构具有多维性。此外,研究还表明 EFs 与智力之间的关系具有年龄相关性。我们在两个不同的年龄组中比较分析了 EF 结构及其与流体智力的关系。样本包括 n = 145 名学龄前儿童(5.2-6.7 岁)和 n = 109 名小学生(8.8-11.8 岁),他们完成了工作记忆、抑制、认知灵活性和流体智力的测量。验证性因子分析(CFA)表明,在学龄前和小学生中,单因素模型最能代表 EF 任务的表现。多组 CFA 表明,EFs 和智力在两个年龄组之间具有等效且较强的关系(学龄前和小学生的 r =.64)。我们的研究结果证实,EFs 与流体智力显著相关,但在儿童期,它们可能不会形成统一的连续分化为多个 EF 成分的模式。我们讨论了同时干扰等方法学因素如何对儿童中期和晚期分化的先前研究结果产生影响。