• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

14 年后,幼儿自我克制的发展轨迹预测了执行功能的个体差异:一项行为遗传学分析。

Developmental trajectories in toddlers' self-restraint predict individual differences in executive functions 14 years later: a behavioral genetic analysis.

机构信息

Institute for Behavioral Genetics, 447 UCB, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2011 Sep;47(5):1410-30. doi: 10.1037/a0023750.

DOI:10.1037/a0023750
PMID:21668099
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3168720/
Abstract

We examined whether self-restraint in early childhood predicted individual differences in 3 executive functions (EFs; inhibiting prepotent responses, updating working memory, and shifting task sets) in late adolescence in a sample of approximately 950 twins. At ages 14, 20, 24, and 36 months, the children were shown an attractive toy and told not to touch it for 30 s. Latency to touch the toy increased with age, and latent class growth modeling distinguished 2 groups of children that differed in their latencies to touch the toy at all 4 time points. Using confirmatory factor analysis, we decomposed the 3 EFs (measured with latent variables at age 17 years) into a Common EF factor (isomorphic to response inhibition ability) and 2 factors specific to updating and shifting. Less-restrained children had significantly lower scores on the Common EF factor, equivalent scores on the Updating-Specific factor, and higher scores on the Shifting-Specific factor than did the more-restrained children. The less-restrained group also had lower IQ scores, but this effect was entirely mediated by the EF components. Twin models indicated that the associations were primarily genetic in origin for the Common EF variable but split between genetics and nonshared environment for the Shifting-Specific variable. These results suggest a biological relation between individual differences in self-restraint and EFs, one that begins early in life and persists into late adolescence.

摘要

我们在大约 950 对双胞胎的样本中研究了儿童期的自我克制是否可以预测青少年晚期的 3 种执行功能(EF;抑制优势反应、更新工作记忆和转换任务集)的个体差异。在 14、20、24 和 36 个月大时,孩子们被展示了一个有吸引力的玩具,并被告知 30 秒内不要碰它。触摸玩具的潜伏期随年龄增长而增加,潜在类别增长模型区分了两组在所有 4 个时间点触摸玩具的潜伏期不同的儿童。使用验证性因子分析,我们将 3 种 EF(在 17 岁时通过潜在变量进行测量)分解为一个共同 EF 因素(与反应抑制能力同形)和 2 个专门用于更新和转换的因素。与自我克制程度较高的儿童相比,自我克制程度较低的儿童在共同 EF 因素上的得分显著较低,在更新特定因素上的得分相当,在转换特定因素上的得分较高。自我克制程度较低的儿童的智商得分也较低,但这种影响完全是由 EF 成分介导的。双胞胎模型表明,这些关联主要是共同 EF 变量的遗传起源,但在转换特定变量中,遗传和非共享环境之间存在分歧。这些结果表明,自我克制和 EF 之间的个体差异存在生物学关系,这种关系始于生命早期,并持续到青少年晚期。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b683/3168720/998c7bc56efa/nihms310036f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b683/3168720/902872e55765/nihms310036f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b683/3168720/25f2720bb5ee/nihms310036f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b683/3168720/de061717dc3b/nihms310036f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b683/3168720/aeee26794449/nihms310036f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b683/3168720/998c7bc56efa/nihms310036f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b683/3168720/902872e55765/nihms310036f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b683/3168720/25f2720bb5ee/nihms310036f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b683/3168720/de061717dc3b/nihms310036f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b683/3168720/aeee26794449/nihms310036f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b683/3168720/998c7bc56efa/nihms310036f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Developmental trajectories in toddlers' self-restraint predict individual differences in executive functions 14 years later: a behavioral genetic analysis.14 年后,幼儿自我克制的发展轨迹预测了执行功能的个体差异:一项行为遗传学分析。
Dev Psychol. 2011 Sep;47(5):1410-30. doi: 10.1037/a0023750.
2
Individual differences in childhood sleep problems predict later cognitive executive control.儿童睡眠问题的个体差异预示着日后的认知执行控制能力。
Sleep. 2009 Mar;32(3):323-33. doi: 10.1093/sleep/32.3.323.
3
Stability and change in executive function abilities from late adolescence to early adulthood: A longitudinal twin study.从青少年晚期到成年早期执行功能能力的稳定性与变化:一项纵向双生子研究。
Dev Psychol. 2016 Feb;52(2):326-40. doi: 10.1037/dev0000075.
4
Strong genetic overlap between executive functions and intelligence.执行功能与智力之间存在很强的基因重叠。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Sep;145(9):1141-59. doi: 10.1037/xge0000195. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
5
The factorial structure of executive functions in preschool and elementary school children and relations with intelligence.执行功能在学前和小学儿童中的因素结构及其与智力的关系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Oct;246:106014. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106014. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
6
Genes Unite Executive Functions in Childhood.基因在儿童期整合执行功能。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Aug;26(8):1151-63. doi: 10.1177/0956797615577209. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
7
Developmental changes in executive functions during adolescence: A study of inhibition, shifting, and working memory.青少年期执行功能的发展变化:一项关于抑制、转换和工作记忆的研究。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2020 Mar;38(1):74-89. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12307. Epub 2019 Oct 6.
8
Executive function and psychosocial adjustment in healthy children and adolescents: A latent variable modelling investigation.健康儿童和青少年的执行功能与社会心理适应:一项潜在变量建模研究。
Child Neuropsychol. 2016;22(3):292-317. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2014.994484. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
9
Greater attention problems during childhood predict poorer executive functioning in late adolescence.童年时期更严重的注意力问题预示着青少年后期的执行功能较差。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Oct;18(10):893-900. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01997.x.
10
Developmental differences in the structure of executive function in middle childhood and adolescence.儿童中期和青少年执行功能结构的发展差异。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 29;8(10):e77770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077770. eCollection 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
Concurrent and longitudinal associations between touchscreen use and executive functions at preschool-age.学龄前儿童触摸屏使用与执行功能之间的并发和纵向关联。
Front Dev Psychol. 2024 Aug 14;2. doi: 10.3389/fdpys.2024.1422635.
2
The neural correlates of response inhibition across the transition from infancy to toddlerhood: An fNIRS study.从婴儿期到幼儿期过渡阶段反应抑制的神经关联:一项功能近红外光谱研究。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Jun 28;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00206. eCollection 2024.
3
Longitudinal Development of Executive Function from Infancy to Late Childhood.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic Relations Between Effortful and Attentional Control and Symptoms of Psychopathology in Middle Childhood.童年中期努力控制和注意力控制与精神病理学症状之间的遗传关系。
Infant Child Dev. 2008 Aug;17(4):365-385. doi: 10.1002/icd.581. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
2
When mental inflexibility facilitates executive control: beneficial side effects of ruminative tendencies on goal maintenance.当心理灵活性促进执行控制时:沉思倾向对目标维持的有益副作用。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Oct;21(10):1377-82. doi: 10.1177/0956797610381505. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
3
Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic.
从婴儿期到童年晚期执行功能的纵向发展
Cogn Dev. 2022 Jul-Sep;63. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101229. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
4
Inhibition and updating share common resources: Bayesian evidence from signal detection theory and drift diffusion model.抑制与更新共享共同资源:来自信号检测理论和漂移扩散模型的贝叶斯证据。
Psychol Res. 2025 Jul 22;89(4):128. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02160-x.
5
Modeling the Latent Factor Structure of the "EXcEEDS" (EXecutive function Early Evaluation in Down Syndrome) Battery.对“EXcEEDS”(唐氏综合征执行功能早期评估)测试组的潜在因素结构进行建模。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2025 May 1;130(3):195-208. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-130.3.195.
6
Validation of an Adaptive Assessment of Executive Functions (Adaptive Cognitive Evaluation-Explorer): Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Analyses of Cognitive Task Performance.执行功能适应性评估(适应性认知评估探索者)的验证:认知任务表现的纵向和横断面分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 21;27:e60041. doi: 10.2196/60041.
7
The role of executive function in the processing and acquisition of syntax.执行功能在句法处理和习得中的作用。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Mar 27;12(3):201497. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201497. eCollection 2025 Mar.
8
Child Vocabulary and Developmental Growth in Executive Functions During Toddlerhood.幼儿期儿童词汇与执行功能的发育成长
Dev Sci. 2025 May;28(3):e70010. doi: 10.1111/desc.70010.
9
Simple Executive Function as an endophenotype of autism-ADHD, and differing associations between simple versus complex Executive Functions and autism/ADHD traits.简单执行功能作为自闭症-注意力缺陷多动障碍的一种内表型,以及简单执行功能与复杂执行功能和自闭症/注意力缺陷多动障碍特征之间的不同关联。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 10;15(1):4925. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87863-2.
10
GenomicSEM Modelling of Diverse Executive Function GWAS Improves Gene Discovery.不同执行功能全基因组关联研究的基因组结构方程模型改进了基因发现。
Behav Genet. 2025 Mar;55(2):71-85. doi: 10.1007/s10519-025-10214-4. Epub 2025 Feb 1.
确保尺度差异卡方检验统计量的正值性。
Psychometrika. 2010 Jun;75(2):243-248. doi: 10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y.
4
Toward a physical basis of attention and self regulation.朝向注意和自我调节的物理基础。
Phys Life Rev. 2009 Jun;6(2):103-20. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2009.02.001.
5
Where self-control comes from: on the development of self-control and its relationship to deviance over time.自我控制从何而来:关于自我控制的发展及其与时间推移的偏差的关系。
Dev Psychol. 2010 Jan;46(1):245-57. doi: 10.1037/a0016538.
6
Wait for it! A twin study of inhibitory control in early childhood.等待一下!一项关于儿童早期抑制控制的双胞胎研究。
Behav Genet. 2010 May;40(3):327-37. doi: 10.1007/s10519-009-9316-6. Epub 2009 Nov 21.
7
Latent class analysis of the Child Behavior Checklist Obsessive-Compulsive Scale.潜类分析在儿童行为检查表强迫症量表中的应用。
Compr Psychiatry. 2009 Nov-Dec;50(6):584-92. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
8
Executive functions in adolescence: inferences from brain and behavior.青少年的执行功能:来自大脑与行为的推断
Dev Sci. 2009 Nov;12(6):825-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00918.x.
9
Attention problems, inhibitory control, and intelligence index overlapping genetic factors: a study in 9-, 12-, and 18-year-old twins.注意力问题、抑制控制与智力指数的重叠遗传因素:一项针对9岁、12岁和18岁双胞胎的研究。
Neuropsychology. 2009 May;23(3):381-391. doi: 10.1037/a0014915.
10
Individual differences in childhood sleep problems predict later cognitive executive control.儿童睡眠问题的个体差异预示着日后的认知执行控制能力。
Sleep. 2009 Mar;32(3):323-33. doi: 10.1093/sleep/32.3.323.