• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对英国针对家庭暴力和虐待行为的“整体健康”应对措施的现实主义评估。

A Realist Evaluation of a "Whole Health" Response to Domestic Violence and Abuse in the UK.

作者信息

Pell Bethan, Melendez-Torres G J, Buckley Kelly, Evans Rhiannon, Robinson Amanda

机构信息

DECIPHer, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

Violence Against Women. 2024 Jul 23;31(11):10778012241265364. doi: 10.1177/10778012241265364.

DOI:10.1177/10778012241265364
PMID:39043123
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12241672/
Abstract

Health Pathfinder is a multilevel system change intervention initiated to transform the health response to domestic violence and abuse in eight sites in England. The current study drew upon interviews with health professionals ( = 27) and victim-survivors ( = 20) to provide a realist account of how this intervention achieved its goals. Findings show that five change mechanisms explain why Health Pathfinder was effective as an ecological intervention: awareness, expertise, relationships, empowerment, and evidence. Positive progress in respect of each mechanism had meaningful impacts on victim-survivor experiences of enquiry, disclosure, and uptake of services and had the potential to meaningfully impact health inequities.

摘要

“健康探索者”是一项多层次的系统变革干预措施,旨在转变英格兰八个地区针对家庭暴力和虐待行为的健康应对方式。当前的研究通过对卫生专业人员(27名)和受害者幸存者(20名)的访谈,对这一干预措施如何实现其目标进行了现实主义的描述。研究结果表明,有五个变革机制解释了为什么“健康探索者”作为一种生态干预措施是有效的:意识、专业知识、关系、赋权和证据。每个机制方面的积极进展对受害者幸存者的询问、披露和服务接受体验产生了有意义的影响,并有潜力对健康不平等产生有意义的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df4/12241672/ca4866b88047/10.1177_10778012241265364-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df4/12241672/ca4866b88047/10.1177_10778012241265364-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df4/12241672/ca4866b88047/10.1177_10778012241265364-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
A Realist Evaluation of a "Whole Health" Response to Domestic Violence and Abuse in the UK.对英国针对家庭暴力和虐待行为的“整体健康”应对措施的现实主义评估。
Violence Against Women. 2024 Jul 23;31(11):10778012241265364. doi: 10.1177/10778012241265364.
2
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
3
Understanding management and support for domestic violence and abuse within emergency departments: A systematic literature review from 2000-2015.了解急诊科中家庭暴力和虐待的管理和支持:2000-2015 年的系统文献回顾。
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):4013-4027. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13849. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
4
Implementation of link workers in primary care: Synopsis of findings from a realist evaluation.基层医疗中联络人员的实施:现实主义评价的结果概要
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(27):1-30. doi: 10.3310/KHGT9993.
5
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
6
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 48 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2020.暴力死亡监测 - 全国暴力死亡报告系统,2020 年,48 个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2023 May 26;72(5):1-38. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7205a1.
7
Factors within the clinical encounter that impact upon risk assessment within child and adolescent mental health services: a rapid realist synthesis.临床接触中的影响儿童和青少年心理健康服务风险评估的因素:快速现实主义综合评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jan;12(1):1-107. doi: 10.3310/VKTY5822.
8
Barriers and facilitators of disclosing domestic violence to the healthcare service: A systematic review of qualitative research.向医疗保健服务机构披露家庭暴力的障碍和促进因素:定性研究的系统评价。
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 May;29(3):612-630. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13282. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
9
'Where is the help for me here?' Female domestic violence survivors' narratives of navigating and receiving secondary-care mental health services in the United Kingdom.“我在这里能得到什么帮助?”英国女性家庭暴力幸存者讲述寻求和接受二级心理健康服务的经历
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251336142. doi: 10.1177/17455057251336142. Epub 2025 Aug 17.
10
A digital intervention to improve mental health and interpersonal resilience for young people who have experienced online sexual abuse: the i-Minds non-randomised feasibility clinical trial and nested qualitative study.一项针对遭受网络性虐待的年轻人改善心理健康和人际恢复力的数字干预措施:i-Minds非随机可行性临床试验及嵌套定性研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(28):1-27. doi: 10.3310/THAL8732.

本文引用的文献

1
How to Facilitate Disclosure of Violence while Delivering Perinatal Care: The Experience of Survivors and Healthcare Providers.在提供围产期护理时如何促进暴力事件的披露:幸存者和医疗保健提供者的经验
J Fam Violence. 2023;38(3):571-583. doi: 10.1007/s10896-022-00371-z. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
2
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
3
Boundary-Work and the Distribution of Care for Survivors of Domestic Violence and Abuse in Primary Care Settings: Perspectives From U.K. Clinicians.
在初级保健环境中为家庭暴力和虐待幸存者提供护理的边界工作和分配:英国临床医生的观点。
Qual Health Res. 2021 Jul;31(9):1697-1709. doi: 10.1177/1049732321998299. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
4
What barriers prevent health professionals screening women for domestic abuse? A literature review.哪些障碍阻止了卫生专业人员对女性进行家庭暴力筛查?文献回顾。
Br J Nurs. 2020 Jul 9;29(13):754-760. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2020.29.13.754.
5
Health practitioners' readiness to address domestic violence and abuse: A qualitative meta-synthesis.卫生保健从业者应对家庭暴力和虐待的准备情况:定性元分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 16;15(6):e0234067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234067. eCollection 2020.
6
"From taboo to routine": a qualitative evaluation of a hospital-based advocacy intervention for domestic violence and abuse.“从禁忌到常规”:一项基于医院的家庭暴力和虐待倡导干预的定性评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 21;20(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4924-1.
7
Cry for health: a quantitative evaluation of a hospital-based advocacy intervention for domestic violence and abuse.呼吁健康:基于医院的家庭暴力和虐待倡导干预的定量评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 21;19(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4621-0.
8
Realist Synthesis for Public Health: Building an Ontologically Deep Understanding of How Programs Work, For Whom, and In Which Contexts.公共卫生中的现实主义综合:深入了解方案如何运作、针对谁以及在哪些背景下运作。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;40:361-372. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044451. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
9
Still Looking for Mechanisms: A Realist Review of Batterer Intervention Programs.仍在探寻机制:施虐者干预项目的现实主义综述
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2020 Oct;21(4):741-753. doi: 10.1177/1524838018791285. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
10
Violence against women and mental health.针对妇女的暴力行为与心理健康
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;4(2):159-170. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30261-9. Epub 2016 Nov 15.