Lundeberg T, Bondesson L, Lundström V
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1985;64(6):491-7. doi: 10.3109/00016348509156727.
In this study we describe the use of high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) (100 Hz) and low-frequency TENS (lf-TENS) (2 Hz trains) as compared with placebo-TENS (p-TENS) in a group of 21 patients suffering from primary dysmenorrhea. Naloxone, a relatively pure opiate antagonist, was an additional test administered to 6 volunteer patients who had experienced an alleviation of pain with TENS. As will be seen, 14 out of 21 patients receiving high-frequency TENS (hf-TENS) experienced a pain reduction exceeding 50% of its original intensity. During lf-TENS or p-TENS, only 7 and 5 patients, respectively, obtained pain relief exceeding 50%. In 4 out of 6 volunteer patients, the relief of pain obtained with lf-TENS was counteracted by naloxone, whereas the relief experienced with hf-TENS in the same patients was, in general, unaffected by naloxone.
在本研究中,我们描述了在一组21名原发性痛经患者中,使用高频经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)(100赫兹)和低频TENS(lf-TENS)(2赫兹串)并与安慰剂TENS(p-TENS)进行比较的情况。纳洛酮是一种相对纯的阿片拮抗剂,对6名使用TENS后疼痛得到缓解的志愿者患者进行了额外测试。可以看出,21名接受高频TENS(hf-TENS)的患者中有14名疼痛减轻超过其原始强度的50%。在lf-TENS或p-TENS期间,分别只有7名和5名患者疼痛缓解超过50%。在6名志愿者患者中的4名中,lf-TENS所获得的疼痛缓解被纳洛酮抵消,而同一患者中hf-TENS所经历的缓解通常不受纳洛酮影响。