Post-Graduate Program in Neurology, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Fluminense Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 24;14(1):17001. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68093-4.
The Continuous Visual Attention Test (CVAT) is a test that detects visuomotor reaction time (RT, alertness), variability of reaction time (VRT, sustained attention), omission errors (OE, focused attention), and commission errors (CE, response inhibition). The standard test takes 15 min, while the ultrafast version only 90 s. Besides overall task length, the two versions differ by target probability (20% and 80% in the 15-min vs. only 80% in the 90-s test) and stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) (1, 2, and 4 s in the 15-min vs. only 1 s in the 90-s test. We aimed to analyze the effect of target probability, SOA, and time length on the CVAT variables across the 15-min task and to verify correlations and agreements between the 15-min and the 90-s CVATs. 205 healthy participants performed the two CVATs on the same day. Considering the 15-min task, RT and CE were strongly affected by target probability. Conversely, VRT was not affected. When the 15-min task was compared to the 90-s task, we found no significant difference in the VRT variable. Additionally, a significant agreement between the two tasks was found for the VRT variable. We concluded that sustained attention can be measured with the 90-s CVAT.
连续视觉注意力测试 (CVAT) 是一种检测视动反应时 (RT,警觉性)、反应时变异性 (VRT,持续注意力)、遗漏错误 (OE,集中注意力) 和误报错误 (CE,反应抑制) 的测试。标准测试需要 15 分钟,而超快版本仅需 90 秒。除了总任务长度外,这两个版本在目标概率 (15 分钟测试中的 20%和 80%,而 90 秒测试中只有 80%) 和刺激起始时的异步性 (SOA) (1、2 和 4 秒,而 90 秒测试中只有 1 秒) 方面也有所不同。我们旨在分析目标概率、SOA 和时间长度对 15 分钟任务中 CVAT 变量的影响,并验证 15 分钟和 90 秒 CVAT 之间的相关性和一致性。205 名健康参与者在同一天进行了这两种 CVAT。考虑到 15 分钟的任务,RT 和 CE 受到目标概率的强烈影响。相反,VRT 不受影响。当将 15 分钟的任务与 90 秒的任务进行比较时,我们发现 VRT 变量没有显著差异。此外,还发现这两个任务在 VRT 变量上具有显著的一致性。我们得出结论,90 秒 CVAT 可用于测量持续注意力。