Bowen Daniel J, Kauling Robert M, Pelosi Chiara, van Haveren Lourus, McGhie Jackie S, Cuypers Judith A A E, Hirsch Alexander, Roos-Hesselink Jolien W, van den Bosch Annemien E
Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2023 Oct 11;1(2):qyad033. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyad033. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Advanced transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) using volumetric and deformational indices provides detailed quantification of right ventricular (RV) function in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD). Two-dimensional multi-plane echocardiography (2D-MPE) has demonstrated regional wall differences in RV longitudinal strain (LS). This study aims to evaluate the association of these parameters with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).
One-hundred stable ACHD patients with primarily affected RVs were included (age 50 ± 5 years; 53% male). Conventional and advanced echocardiographic RV functional parameters were compared with CMR-derived RV function. Advanced echocardiographic RV functional parameters were measurable in approximately one-half of the study cohort, while multi-wall LS assessment feasibility was lower. CMR RV ejection fraction (CMR-RVEF) was moderately correlated with deformational, area, and volumetric parameters [RV global LS (lateral wall and septum), = 55: = -0.62, < 0.001; RV wall average LS, = 34: = -0.49, = 0.002; RV lateral wall LS, = 56: = -0.45, < 0.001; fractional area change, = 67: = 0.48, < 0.001; 3D-RVEF, = 48: = 0.40, = 0.005]. Conventional measurements such as TAPSE and RV S' correlated poorly. RV global LS best identified CMR-RVEF < 45% (area under the curve: 0.84, < 0.001: cut-off value -19%: sensitivity 100%, specificity 57%). RVEF and LS values were significantly higher when measured by CMR compared with TTE (mean difference RVEF: 5 [-9 to 18] %; lateral (free) wall LS: -7 [7 to -21] %; RV global LS: -6 [5 to -16] %) while there was no association between respective LS values.
In ACHD patients, advanced echocardiographic RV functional parameters are moderately correlated with CMR-RVEF, although significant differences exist between indices measurable by both modalities.
采用容积和变形指数的先进经胸超声心动图(TTE)可对先天性心脏病成人患者(ACHD)的右心室(RV)功能进行详细量化。二维多平面超声心动图(2D-MPE)已显示右心室纵向应变(LS)存在区域壁差异。本研究旨在评估这些参数与心血管磁共振(CMR)之间的关联。
纳入100例主要累及右心室的稳定ACHD患者(年龄50±5岁;53%为男性)。将传统和先进的超声心动图右心室功能参数与CMR得出的右心室功能进行比较。先进的超声心动图右心室功能参数在大约一半的研究队列中可测量,而多壁LS评估的可行性较低。CMR右心室射血分数(CMR-RVEF)与变形、面积和容积参数呈中度相关[右心室整体LS(侧壁和室间隔),n = 55:r = -0.62,P < 0.001;右心室壁平均LS,n = 34:r = -0.49,P = 0.002;右心室侧壁LS,n = 56:r = -0.45,P < 0.001;面积变化分数,n = 67:r = 0.48,P < 0.001;三维右心室射血分数,n = 48:r = 0.40,P = 0.005]。传统测量指标如三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移(TAPSE)和右心室S'相关性较差。右心室整体LS对CMR-RVEF < 45%的识别效果最佳(曲线下面积:0.84,P < 0.001:截断值-19%:敏感性100%,特异性57%)。与TTE相比,CMR测量的RVEF和LS值显著更高(RVEF平均差异:5 [-9至18] %;外侧(游离)壁LS:-7 [7至-21] %;右心室整体LS:-6 [5至-16] %),而各自的LS值之间无关联。
在ACHD患者中,先进的超声心动图右心室功能参数与CMR-RVEF呈中度相关,尽管两种检查方法可测量的指标之间存在显著差异。