• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型息肉取出袋可降低结肠息肉切除术的息肉碎裂率:一项单盲随机对照研究。

A novel polyp retrieval bag reduces the polyp fragmentation rate in colon polypectomy: a single-blind randomized controlled study.

机构信息

Senior Department of Hepatology, the Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China.

Senior Department of Gastroenterology, the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100071, China.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jul 24;39(1):118. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04694-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-024-04694-9
PMID:39048748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11269458/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The fragmentation of polyps affects complete resection confirmation. The primary aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a novel polyp retrieval bag for reducing the fragmentation rate of colon polyps.

METHODS

Patients with a 5-15 mm colon polyp were recruited and randomized into two groups at a 1:1 ratio. After polyp resection, polyps obtained from patients in the treatment group were extracted via a novel polyp retrieval bag without traversing the instrument channel, whereas polyps obtained from patients in the control group were collected through the instrument channel, attaching the polyp trap to the instrument channel port, and applying suction.

RESULTS

From January to July 2022, 225 patients were assessed for eligibility. The study participants included 204 patients, and seven patients whose samples were not retrieved were excluded. Polyp fragmentation was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group (3.0% [3/100] vs. 17.5% [17/97], P = 0.001). The retrieval failure rates in the treatment group and control group were not significantly different (2.0% [2/102] vs. 4.9% [5/102], P = 0.442). There were fewer colonoscope insertions in the treatment group than in the control group (102 vs. 110), but a significant difference was not present (P = 0.065). No significant adverse events were observed during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the polyp retrieval bag was safe and feasible for reducing the fragmentation rate of retrieved polyps.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05189912, 1/12/2021).

摘要

目的

息肉的碎裂会影响完全切除的确认。本研究的主要目的是评估一种新型息肉回收袋减少结肠息肉碎裂率的可行性。

方法

招募了直径为 5-15mm 的结肠息肉患者,并以 1:1 的比例随机分为两组。息肉切除后,治疗组的息肉通过新型息肉回收袋提取,无需穿过器械通道,而对照组的息肉则通过器械通道收集,将息肉捕捉器连接到器械通道端口,并施加吸力。

结果

2022 年 1 月至 7 月,对 225 名患者进行了资格评估。研究参与者包括 204 名患者,7 名未提取样本的患者被排除。治疗组的息肉碎裂率明显低于对照组(3.0%[3/100]比 17.5%[17/97],P=0.001)。治疗组和对照组的回收失败率无显著差异(2.0%[2/102]比 4.9%[5/102],P=0.442)。治疗组的结肠镜插入次数少于对照组(102 次比 110 次),但差异无统计学意义(P=0.065)。在随访期间未观察到严重不良事件。

结论

本研究表明,息肉回收袋安全且可行,可降低回收息肉的碎裂率。

试验注册

该研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(NCT05189912,2021 年 1 月 12 日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5471/11269458/d633bc77b3ff/384_2024_4694_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5471/11269458/7b0a1a8f79e1/384_2024_4694_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5471/11269458/884efe625777/384_2024_4694_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5471/11269458/d633bc77b3ff/384_2024_4694_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5471/11269458/7b0a1a8f79e1/384_2024_4694_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5471/11269458/884efe625777/384_2024_4694_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5471/11269458/d633bc77b3ff/384_2024_4694_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A novel polyp retrieval bag reduces the polyp fragmentation rate in colon polypectomy: a single-blind randomized controlled study.一种新型息肉取出袋可降低结肠息肉切除术的息肉碎裂率:一项单盲随机对照研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jul 24;39(1):118. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04694-9.
2
Alternative approaches to polyp extraction in colonoscopy: a proof of principle study.结肠镜下息肉提取的替代方法:原理验证研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Sep;88(3):536-541. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
3
Water-slider method reduced colonic polyp fragmentation compared with conventional suction retrieval: A prospective randomized controlled study.与传统吸引取出法相比,水滑法减少了结肠息肉破碎:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Dig Liver Dis. 2021 Jun;53(6):717-721. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.12.116. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
4
Factors associated with failed polyp retrieval at screening colonoscopy.与筛查结肠镜检查中息肉无法取出相关的因素。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Mar;77(3):395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
5
Retrieval of colorectal polyps following snare polypectomy: Experience of the multiple-suction technique in 602 cases.圈套器息肉切除术后大肠息肉的回收:602例多抽吸技术的经验
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Apr;23(4):431-6. doi: 10.1007/s00384-007-0429-1.
6
Colon polyp retrieval after cold snaring.冷圈套切除术后结肠息肉取出术
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Aug;62(2):253-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(05)00376-7.
7
Physician assessment and management of complex colon polyps: a multicenter video-based survey study.医生对复杂结肠息肉的评估和管理:一项基于多中心视频的调查研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep;109(9):1312-24. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.95. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
8
Effectiveness of suction valve button removal in retrieving resected colon polyps for better histological assessment: Propensity score matching analysis.移除吸引阀按钮在提高结肠息肉切除标本组织学评估中的有效性:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dig Endosc. 2021 Mar;33(3):433-440. doi: 10.1111/den.13779. Epub 2020 Sep 27.
9
Effects of Blended (Yellow) vs Forced Coagulation (Blue) Currents on Adverse Events, Complete Resection, or Polyp Recurrence After Polypectomy in a Large Randomized Trial.在一项大型随机试验中,混合(黄色)与强制凝血(蓝色)电流对息肉切除术后不良事件、完全切除或息肉复发的影响。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Jul;159(1):119-128.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.014. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
10
Polyp retrieval after colonoscopic polypectomy: use of the Roth Retrieval Net.结肠镜息肉切除术后的息肉取出:使用罗斯取出网。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Oct;54(4):505-7. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.118255.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical and Genomic Characterization of Interval Colorectal Cancer in 3 Prospective Cohorts.临床和基因组特征分析 3 项前瞻性队列间隔期结直肠癌。
Gastroenterology. 2022 Dec;163(6):1522-1530.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.08.020. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
2
Water-slider method reduced colonic polyp fragmentation compared with conventional suction retrieval: A prospective randomized controlled study.与传统吸引取出法相比,水滑法减少了结肠息肉破碎:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Dig Liver Dis. 2021 Jun;53(6):717-721. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.12.116. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
3
Incomplete endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps: a prospective quality assurance study.
结直肠息肉内镜切除不完全:一项前瞻性质量保证研究。
Endoscopy. 2021 Apr;53(4):383-391. doi: 10.1055/a-1243-0379. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
4
Histopathologic features and fragmentation of polyps with cold snare defect protrusions.冷圈套缺陷突出的息肉的组织病理学特征和碎片。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Apr;93(4):952-959. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.07.040. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
5
Effectiveness of suction valve button removal in retrieving resected colon polyps for better histological assessment: Propensity score matching analysis.移除吸引阀按钮在提高结肠息肉切除标本组织学评估中的有效性:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dig Endosc. 2021 Mar;33(3):433-440. doi: 10.1111/den.13779. Epub 2020 Sep 27.
6
Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection.日本肠胃病学会结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离/内镜黏膜切除术指南。
Dig Endosc. 2020 Jan;32(2):219-239. doi: 10.1111/den.13545. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
7
Utilization of a specimen retrieval bag during laparoscopic appendectomy for both uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis is not associated with a decrease in postoperative surgical site infection rates.在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中使用标本取出袋,无论是用于单纯性阑尾炎还是复杂性阑尾炎,都与术后手术部位感染率的降低无关。
Surgery. 2019 Jun;165(6):1199-1202. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.02.010. Epub 2019 Apr 28.
8
Mortality From Postscreening (Interval) Colorectal Cancers Is Comparable to That From Cancer in Unscreened Patients-A Randomized Sigmoidoscopy Trial.筛查后(间隔期)结直肠癌死亡率与未筛查患者癌症死亡率相当——一项随机乙状结肠镜检查试验。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Dec;155(6):1787-1794.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.035. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
9
World Endoscopy Organization Consensus Statements on Post-Colonoscopy and Post-Imaging Colorectal Cancer.世界内镜组织关于结肠镜检查和成像后结直肠癌的共识声明。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Sep;155(3):909-925.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.038. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
10
Alternative approaches to polyp extraction in colonoscopy: a proof of principle study.结肠镜下息肉提取的替代方法:原理验证研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Sep;88(3):536-541. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 Jun 6.