• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与筛查结肠镜检查中息肉无法取出相关的因素。

Factors associated with failed polyp retrieval at screening colonoscopy.

机构信息

The Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St. Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Mar;77(3):395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Dec 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.007
PMID:23211749
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer mortality and morbidity principally by the detection and removal of colon polyps. It is important to retrieve resected polyps to be able to ascertain their histologic characteristics.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the cause of polyp retrieval failure.

DESIGN

Bowel cancer screening colonoscopy data were collected prospectively.

SETTING

The Bowel Cancer Screening Program in the National Health Service.

PATIENTS

Screening participants were referred to our screening center after a positive fecal occult blood test result.

INTERVENTION

A total of 4383 polyps were endoscopically removed from 1495 patients from October 2006 to February 2011.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The number, size, shape, and location of polyps; polyp removal method; quality of bowel preparation; total examination time; and insertion and withdrawal times in collected data were examined retrospectively.

RESULTS

The polyp retrieval rate was 93.9%, and the failure rate was 6.1%, thus 267 polyps were not retrieved. In univariate analysis, factors affecting polyp retrieval failure were small polyp size, sessile polyps, and cold snare polypectomy (P < .001). Polyp retrieval was less successful in the proximal colon (P = .002). In multivariate analysis, polyp size and method of removal were independent risk factors for polyp retrieval failure (P < .001).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study.

CONCLUSION

Small polyp size and cold snare removal were found to be significantly associated with polyp retrieval failure. It was difficult to retrieve small, sessile, and proximal colon polyps. Optical diagnosis could be an efficacious option as a surrogate for histologic diagnosis for these lesions in the near future.

摘要

背景

结肠镜检查通过检测和切除结肠息肉,主要降低结直肠癌的死亡率和发病率。切除息肉后,重要的是要取回这些息肉,以便确定其组织学特征。

目的

本研究旨在评估息肉回收失败的原因。

设计

收集了国家卫生服务局(NHS)结直肠癌筛查结肠镜检查的数据。

设置

结直肠癌筛查计划。

患者

阳性粪便潜血试验结果的筛查参与者被转诊至我们的筛查中心。

干预

从 2006 年 10 月至 2011 年 2 月,对 1495 名患者共切除了 4383 个息肉。

主要观察指标

在收集的数据中,对息肉的数量、大小、形状和位置、息肉切除方法、肠道准备质量、总检查时间、插入和退出时间进行了回顾性检查。

结果

息肉回收率为 93.9%,失败率为 6.1%,因此有 267 个息肉未被回收。单因素分析显示,影响息肉回收失败的因素有息肉小、息肉无蒂和冷圈套息肉切除术(P<0.001)。近端结肠的息肉回收成功率较低(P=0.002)。多因素分析显示,息肉大小和切除方法是息肉回收失败的独立危险因素(P<0.001)。

局限性

回顾性研究。

结论

息肉小、冷圈套切除是与息肉回收失败显著相关的因素。对于小的、无蒂的、近端结肠的息肉,回收较为困难。在不久的将来,光学诊断可能是这些病变进行组织学诊断的有效替代方法。

相似文献

1
Factors associated with failed polyp retrieval at screening colonoscopy.与筛查结肠镜检查中息肉无法取出相关的因素。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Mar;77(3):395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
2
Colon polyp retrieval after cold snaring.冷圈套切除术后结肠息肉取出术
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Aug;62(2):253-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(05)00376-7.
3
Role of colonoscopy and polyp characteristics in colorectal cancer after colonoscopic polyp detection: a population-based case-control study.结肠镜检查和息肉特征在结肠镜检查发现息肉后的结直肠癌中的作用:基于人群的病例对照研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Aug 21;157(4):225-32. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-4-201208210-00002.
4
Retrieval of colorectal polyps following snare polypectomy: Experience of the multiple-suction technique in 602 cases.圈套器息肉切除术后大肠息肉的回收:602例多抽吸技术的经验
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Apr;23(4):431-6. doi: 10.1007/s00384-007-0429-1.
5
Prospective randomized comparison of cold snare polypectomy and conventional polypectomy for small colorectal polyps.冷圈套息肉切除术与传统息肉切除术治疗结直肠小息肉的前瞻性随机比较。
Digestion. 2011;84(1):78-81. doi: 10.1159/000323959. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
6
Cold snare polypectomy vs. Cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study.冷圈套息肉切除术与冷活检钳息肉切除术联合双活检技术用于切除微小结直肠息肉的前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;108(10):1593-600. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.302. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
7
Colectomy for endoscopically unresectable polyps: how often is it cancer?内镜下无法切除的息肉行结肠切除术:有多少是癌症?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Nov;55(11):1111-6. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182695115.
8
Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center.内镜转诊中心导向的挑战性结直肠病变内镜黏膜下剥离术的结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Aug;76(2):255-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.060. Epub 2012 May 31.
9
Prevalence of flat lesions in a large screening population and their role in colonoscopy quality improvement.大筛查人群中扁平病变的患病率及其在结肠镜检查质量改进中的作用。
Endoscopy. 2013;45(5):350-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326348. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
10
Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy.抗凝治疗患者中小肠息肉切除术:冷圈套与传统息肉切除术的前瞻性随机比较。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):417-23. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.040. Epub 2013 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Resect and Retrieve Colorectal Polyps: Time for New Insights.切除并获取大肠息肉:获取新见解的时机
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 18;14(16):5846. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165846.
2
Impact of contrast dye submucosal pre-lifting on cold snare resection of small polyps: an Italian randomized observational trial.对比染料黏膜下预抬举对小息肉冷圈套切除术的影响:一项意大利随机观察性试验
Clin Endosc. 2025 Mar;58(2):291-302. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.113. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
3
Clinicopathological evaluation of the efficacy of endoscopic treatment for sessile serrated lesions comparing endoscopic mucosal resection, cold snare polypectomy, and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection.
比较内镜下黏膜切除术、冷圈套息肉切除术和水下内镜黏膜切除术对无蒂锯齿状病变进行内镜治疗疗效的临床病理评估
DEN Open. 2025 Jan 3;5(1):e70051. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70051. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Strategies to improve screening colonoscopy quality for the prevention of colorectal cancer.提高结直肠癌预防筛查结肠镜检查质量的策略。
Korean J Intern Med. 2024 Jul;39(4):547-554. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.334. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
5
Comparative study of convolutional neural network architectures for gastrointestinal lesions classification.卷积神经网络架构在胃肠道病变分类中的比较研究。
PeerJ. 2023 Mar 16;11:e14806. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14806. eCollection 2023.
6
Factors influencing endoscopic estimation of colon polyp size in a colon model.结肠模型中影响内镜下估计结肠息肉大小的因素。
Clin Endosc. 2022 Jul;55(4):540-548. doi: 10.5946/ce.2022.017. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
7
A prospective randomized study comparing jumbo biopsy forceps to cold snare for the resection of diminutive colorectal polyps.一项比较巨检活检钳与冷圈套切除微小结直肠息肉的前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1206-1213. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06874-z. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
8
Risk factors for local recurrence and appropriate surveillance interval after endoscopic resection.内镜切除术后局部复发的危险因素及适当的监测间隔。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar 28;25(12):1502-1512. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i12.1502.
9
Should hot biopsy forceps be abandoned for polypectomy of diminutive colorectal polyps?对于直径较小的结直肠息肉的息肉切除术,是否应该摒弃热活检钳?
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr 14;24(14):1579-1582. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i14.1579.
10
High complete resection rate for pre-lift and cold biopsy of diminutive colorectal polyps.微小结直肠息肉的预抬举法和冷活检法具有较高的完整切除率。
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Feb;6(2):E173-E178. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-121874. Epub 2018 Feb 1.