Division of Neurocritical Care, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (H.K.).
Division of Neurosciences Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (J.I.S.).
Stroke. 2024 Sep;55(9):2397-2400. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048089. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) occurs less often than other stroke types but affects younger patients, imposing a disproportionately high burden of long-term disability. Although management advances have improved outcomes over time, relatively few aSAH treatments have been tested in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). One lesson learned from COVID-19 is that trial platforms can facilitate the efficient execution of multicenter RCTs even in complex diseases during challenging conditions. An aSAH trial platform with standardized eligibility criteria, randomization procedures, and end point definitions would enable the study of multiple targeted interventions in a perpetual manner, with treatments entering and leaving the platform based on predefined decision algorithms. An umbrella institutional review board protocol and clinical trial agreement would allow individual arms to be efficiently added as amendments rather than stand-alone protocols. Standardized case report forms using the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke common data elements and general protocol standardization across arms would create synergies for data management and monitoring. A Bayesian analysis framework would emphasize frequent interim looks to enable early termination of trial arms for futility, common controls, borrowing of information across arms, and adaptive designs. A protocol development committee would assist investigators and encourage pragmatic designs to maximize generalizability, reduce site burden, and execute trials efficiently and cost-effectively. Despite decades of steady clinical progress in the management of aSAH, poor patient outcomes remain common, and despite the increasing availability of RCT data in other fields, it remains difficult to perform RCTs to guide more effective care for aSAH. The development of a platform for pragmatic RCTs in aSAH would help close the evidence gap between aSAH and other stroke types and improve outcomes for this important disease with its disproportionate public health burden.
颅内动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)的发病率低于其他类型的中风,但影响的是年轻患者,给他们带来了不成比例的长期残疾负担。尽管随着时间的推移,管理方法的进步已经改善了预后,但只有相对较少的 aSAH 治疗方法在随机临床试验(RCT)中得到了测试。从 COVID-19 中吸取的一个教训是,试验平台可以促进多中心 RCT 的有效执行,即使在复杂疾病和挑战性条件下也是如此。一个具有标准化纳入标准、随机化程序和终点定义的 aSAH 试验平台,可以以永续的方式研究多种靶向干预措施,根据预设的决策算法,让治疗方法进入和离开平台。一个伞式机构审查委员会方案和临床试验协议将允许作为修正案而不是独立的方案有效地添加个别臂。使用美国国立卫生研究院/国立神经病学与卒中研究所共同数据元素和通用方案标准化的标准化病例报告表,并在各臂之间建立协同作用,将有助于数据管理和监测。贝叶斯分析框架将强调频繁的中期检查,以便能够对试验臂进行早期无效性终止、共同对照、各臂之间的信息借用和适应性设计。一个方案开发委员会将协助调查人员并鼓励采用实用设计,以最大限度地提高普遍性、减轻站点负担,并有效地、具有成本效益地进行试验。尽管在 aSAH 的管理方面取得了数十年的稳定临床进展,但患者预后仍然较差,尽管在其他领域越来越多地提供了 RCT 数据,但仍难以进行 RCT 以指导更有效的 aSAH 护理。开发一个用于实用 RCT 的平台将有助于缩小 aSAH 和其他中风类型之间的证据差距,并改善这种重要疾病的预后,因为它的公共卫生负担不成比例。