Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, McKnight Brain Institute, L3-100, 1149 Newell Drive, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Neurocrit Care. 2023 Apr;38(2):395-406. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01571-7. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
Severe headaches are common after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Guidelines recommend treatment with acetaminophen and opioids, but patient data show that headaches often persist despite multimodal treatment approaches. Considering an overall slim body of data for a common complaint affecting patients with SAH during their intensive care stay, we set out to assess practice patterns in headache management among clinicians who treat patients with SAH.
We conducted an international cross-sectional study through a 37-question Web-based survey distributed to members of five professional societies relevant to intensive and neurocritical care from November 2021 to January 2022. Responses were characterized through descriptive analyses. Fisher's exact test was used to test associations.
Of 516 respondents, 329 of 497 (66%) were from North America and 121 of 497 (24%) from Europe. Of 435 respondents, 379 (87%) reported headache as a major management concern for patients with SAH. Intensive care teams were primarily responsible for analgesia during hospitalization (249 of 435, 57%), whereas responsibility shifted to neurosurgery at discharge (233 of 501, 47%). Most used medications were acetaminophen (90%), opioids (66%), corticosteroids (28%), and antiseizure medications (28%). Opioids or medication combinations including opioids were most frequently perceived as most effective by 169 of 433 respondents (39%, predominantly intensivists), followed by corticosteroids or combinations with corticosteroids (96 of 433, 22%, predominantly neurologists). Of medications prescribed at discharge, acetaminophen was most common (303 of 381, 80%), followed by opioids (175 of 381, 46%) and antiseizure medications (173 of 381, 45%). Opioids during hospitalization were significantly more prescribed by intensivists, by providers managing higher numbers of patients with SAH, and in Europe. At discharge, opioids were more frequently prescribed in North America. Of 435 respondents, 299 (69%) indicated no change in prescription practice of opioids with the opioid crisis. Additional differences in prescription patterns between continents and providers and while inpatient versus at discharge were found.
Post-SAH headache in the intensive care setting is a major clinical concern. Analgesia heavily relies on opioids both in use and in perception of efficacy, with no reported change in prescription patterns for opioids for most providers despite the significant drawbacks of opioids. Responsibility for analgesia shifts between hospitalization and discharge. International and provider-related differences are evident. Novel treatment strategies and alignment of prescription between providers are urgently needed.
蛛网膜下腔出血后常出现严重头痛。指南建议使用对乙酰氨基酚和阿片类药物治疗,但患者数据显示,尽管采用了多模式治疗方法,头痛仍经常持续存在。考虑到在重症监护期间影响蛛网膜下腔出血患者的常见抱怨,我们评估了治疗蛛网膜下腔出血患者的临床医生在头痛管理方面的实践模式。
我们通过一项基于网络的 37 个问题的调查,对五个与重症和神经危重症相关的专业协会的成员进行了一项国际横断面研究,调查于 2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 1 月进行。通过描述性分析来描述反应。使用 Fisher 确切检验来检验关联。
在 516 名受访者中,497 名中的 329 名(66%)来自北美,497 名中的 121 名(24%)来自欧洲。在 435 名受访者中,379 名(87%)报告头痛是蛛网膜下腔出血患者的主要治疗关注点。在住院期间,重症监护团队主要负责镇痛(435 名中的 249 名,57%),而在出院时则由神经外科负责(501 名中的 233 名,47%)。最常使用的药物是对乙酰氨基酚(90%)、阿片类药物(66%)、皮质类固醇(28%)和抗癫痫药物(28%)。169 名受访者中的 433 名(39%,主要是重症监护医生)认为阿片类药物或包括阿片类药物的药物组合最有效,其次是皮质类固醇或皮质类固醇组合(433 名中的 96 名,22%,主要是神经科医生)。在出院时开具的药物中,最常见的是对乙酰氨基酚(381 名中的 303 名,80%),其次是阿片类药物(381 名中的 175 名,46%)和抗癫痫药物(381 名中的 173 名,45%)。住院期间开具的阿片类药物明显更多由重症监护医生开具,由管理更多蛛网膜下腔出血患者的提供者开具,且在欧洲更常见。在出院时,阿片类药物在北美更常被开具。在 435 名受访者中,299 名(69%)表示,尽管阿片类药物危机存在显著缺陷,但他们的阿片类药物处方实践没有改变。还发现了不同大陆和提供者之间以及住院期间和出院时之间处方模式的其他差异。
重症监护环境中的蛛网膜下腔出血后头痛是一个主要的临床关注点。镇痛主要依赖于阿片类药物,无论是在使用方面还是在疗效方面,尽管大多数提供者都报告了阿片类药物处方模式没有改变,但阿片类药物存在显著的缺点。镇痛的责任在住院和出院之间转移。存在国际和提供者相关的差异。迫切需要新的治疗策略和提供者之间的处方一致性。