• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童听觉表现量表(CHAPS)和听觉处理领域问卷(APDQ)在塞浦路斯希腊族儿童中的初步验证

Preliminary Validation of the Children's Auditory Performance Scale (CHAPS) and the Auditory Processing Domain Questionnaire (APDQ) in Greek Cypriot Children.

作者信息

Drosos Konstantinos, Tafiadis Dionysios, Voniati Louiza, Papanicolaou Alexandra, Thodi Chryssoula

机构信息

School of Sciences, Speech and Language Therapy, European University Cyprus, 2404 Nicosia, Cyprus.

Department of Speech and Language Therapy, University of Ioannina, GR-45500 Ioannina, Greece.

出版信息

Audiol Res. 2024 Jul 15;14(4):625-639. doi: 10.3390/audiolres14040053.

DOI:10.3390/audiolres14040053
PMID:39051197
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11270421/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identification of auditory processing disorders is achieved using questionnaires along with linguistic, non-linguistic, and auditory processing tests. Notably, the questionnaires "Children's Auditory Performance Scale" (CHAPS) and "Auditory Processing Domain Questionnaire" (APDQ) are widely recognized and used. The current study investigated the psychometric properties of the CHAPS and APDQ in Greek Cypriot children.

METHODS

The CHAPS and APDQ questionnaires were completed by parents of 40 Greek Cypriot children, 16 typically developing (TD) children, and 24 children with a history of Speech Sound Disorders (SSDs).

RESULTS

There were significant differences between the two groups on both questionnaires. Cronbach's alpha was calculated at α = 0.922 for the CHAPS total score and α = 0.926 for the APDQ total score. The Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analysis provided a cut-off point equal to -0.30 (AUC 0.849, < 0.001) for CHAPS and a cut-off point equal to 90.00 (AUC 0.820, < 0.001) for APDQ. Significant positive Spearman ρ correlations were observed between the CHAPS and APDQ (ρ = 0.639, = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The CHAPS and APDQ can identify distinct auditory processing characteristics between in children with SSDs and TD children.

摘要

背景

听觉处理障碍的识别是通过问卷以及语言、非语言和听觉处理测试来实现的。值得注意的是,“儿童听觉表现量表”(CHAPS)和“听觉处理领域问卷”(APDQ)这两份问卷得到了广泛认可和使用。本研究调查了CHAPS和APDQ在塞浦路斯希腊裔儿童中的心理测量特性。

方法

40名塞浦路斯希腊裔儿童的家长完成了CHAPS和APDQ问卷,其中16名是发育正常(TD)的儿童,24名有语音障碍(SSD)病史的儿童。

结果

两组在两份问卷上均存在显著差异。CHAPS总分的克朗巴哈系数计算为α = 0.922,APDQ总分的克朗巴哈系数为α = 0.926。受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析得出CHAPS的截断点为-0.30(AUC 0.849,P < 0.001),APDQ的截断点为90.00(AUC 0.820,P < 0.001)。CHAPS和APDQ之间观察到显著的正斯皮尔曼ρ相关性(ρ = 0.639,P = 0.001)。

结论

CHAPS和APDQ能够识别出有语音障碍的儿童和发育正常儿童之间不同的听觉处理特征。

相似文献

1
Preliminary Validation of the Children's Auditory Performance Scale (CHAPS) and the Auditory Processing Domain Questionnaire (APDQ) in Greek Cypriot Children.儿童听觉表现量表(CHAPS)和听觉处理领域问卷(APDQ)在塞浦路斯希腊族儿童中的初步验证
Audiol Res. 2024 Jul 15;14(4):625-639. doi: 10.3390/audiolres14040053.
2
Exploring CHAPS as a Potential Measurement for Auditory Processing and Cognitive Ability in Children with Hearing Loss.探索CHAPS作为听力损失儿童听觉处理和认知能力的潜在测量方法。
Audiol Neurootol. 2025;30(1):14-24. doi: 10.1159/000539570. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
3
Setting appropriate pass or fail cut-off criteria for tests to reflect real life listening difficulties in children with suspected auditory processing disorder.为测试设定适当的通过或失败截止标准,以反映疑似听觉处理障碍儿童在现实生活中的听力困难。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 May;84:166-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
4
The Auditory Processing Domains Questionnaire (APDQ): Brazilian-Portuguese version.听觉处理领域问卷(APDQ):巴西葡萄牙语版。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Nov-Dec;88(6):823-840. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.12.001. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
5
[The application of the screening questionnaires for the diagnostics of the central auditory processing disorders in the pediatric practice].
Vestn Otorinolaringol. 2018;83(4):43-50. doi: 10.17116/otorino201883443.
6
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Greek Cypriot Montreal Children's Hospital Feeding Scale.塞浦路斯希腊裔蒙特利尔儿童医院喂养量表的跨文化适应与验证
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2024;76(6):538-547. doi: 10.1159/000538427. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
7
Remediating spatial processing disorder in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children.矫正原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民儿童的空间处理障碍。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Oct;137:110205. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110205. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
8
Developing the auditory processing domains questionnaire (APDQ): a differential screening tool for auditory processing disorder.编制听觉加工领域问卷(APDQ):一种用于听觉加工障碍的鉴别筛查工具。
Int J Audiol. 2018 Oct;57(10):764-775. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1487087. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
9
Personal amplification for school-age children with auditory processing disorders.为患有听觉处理障碍的学龄儿童提供个人扩音设备。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Jun;19(6):465-80. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19.6.3.
10
Validation of the Mandarin version of the LittlEARS® Auditory Questionnaire.《小儿听力问卷》中文版的验证
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Aug;77(8):1350-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.05.033. Epub 2013 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Insights into Hearing Loss.听力损失的临床见解
Audiol Res. 2025 Aug 13;15(4):107. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15040107.

本文引用的文献

1
Auditory Processing and Speech-Sound Disorders.听觉处理与语音障碍
Brain Sci. 2024 Mar 19;14(3):291. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14030291.
2
Listening and Processing Skills in Young School Children with a History of Developmental Phonological Disorder.有发育性语音障碍病史的低龄学童的听力与处理技能
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 31;12(3):359. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12030359.
3
A systematic review and metanalysis of questionnaires used for auditory processing screening and evaluation.用于听觉处理筛查和评估的问卷的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Neurol. 2023 Aug 8;14:1243170. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1243170. eCollection 2023.
4
Comparison of Questionnaire-Based and Performance-Based Screening Tools as Predictors of Auditory Processing Disorder.基于问卷和基于表现的筛查工具在预测听觉处理障碍中的比较。
Am J Audiol. 2020 Jun 8;29(2):143-151. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJA-19-00025. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
5
Relationship between temporal processing and phonological awareness in children with speech sound disorders.语音障碍儿童的时频加工与语音意识的关系。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2020 Jun 2;34(6):566-575. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2019.1671902. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
6
Speech Perception Skills of Children With Speech Sound Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.言语障碍儿童的言语感知技能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Oct 25;62(10):3771-3789. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0519. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
7
Developing the auditory processing domains questionnaire (APDQ): a differential screening tool for auditory processing disorder.编制听觉加工领域问卷(APDQ):一种用于听觉加工障碍的鉴别筛查工具。
Int J Audiol. 2018 Oct;57(10):764-775. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1487087. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
8
Questionnaires and checklists for central auditory processing screening used in Brazil: a systematic review.巴西用于中枢听觉处理筛查的问卷和清单:系统评价。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jan-Feb;85(1):99-110. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
9
Procedures for central auditory processing screening in schoolchildren.学童中枢听觉处理筛查程序。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 May-Jun;85(3):319-328. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
10
A good practice guide for translating and adapting hearing-related questionnaires for different languages and cultures.一份针对不同语言和文化背景翻译及改编听力相关调查问卷的实用指南。
Int J Audiol. 2018 Mar;57(3):161-175. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1393565. Epub 2017 Nov 21.