Suppr超能文献

创伤相关可预防死亡;荷兰阿姆斯特丹一家一级创伤中心的数据分析与专家小组审查

Trauma-related preventable death; data analysis and panel review at a level 1 trauma centre in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

作者信息

Mikdad S, Hakkenbrak N A G, Zuidema W P, Reijnders U J L, de Wit R J, Jansen E H, Schwarte L A, Schouten J W, Bloemers F W, Giannakopoulos G F, Halm J A

机构信息

Trauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Trauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Dec;50(6):3153-3160. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02576-x. Epub 2024 Jul 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Trauma-related death is used as a parameter to evaluate the quality of trauma care and identify cases in which mortality could have been prevented under optimal trauma care conditions. The aim of this study was to identify trauma-related preventable death (TRPD) within our institute by an external expert panel and to evaluate inter-panel reliability.

METHODS

Trauma-related deaths between the 1st of January 2020 and the 1st of February 2022 at the Amsterdam University Medical Centre were identified. The severely injured patients (injury severity score ≥ 16) were enrolled for preventability analysis by an external multidisciplinary panel, consisting of a trauma surgeon, anaesthesiologist, emergency physician, neurosurgeon, and forensic physician. Case descriptions were provided, and panellists were asked to classify deaths as non-preventable, potentially preventable, and preventable. Agreements between the five observers were assessed by Fleiss kappa statistics.

RESULTS

In total 95 trauma-related deaths were identified. Of which 36 fatalities were included for analysis, the mean age was 55.3 years (± 24.5), 69.4% were male and 88.9% suffered blunt trauma. The mean injury severity score was 35.3 (± 15.3). Interobserver agreement within the external panel was moderate for survivability (Fleiss kappa 0.474) but low for categorical preventable death classification (Fleiss kappa 0.298). Most of the disagreements were between non-preventable or potentially preventable with care that could have been improved.

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary panel review has a moderate inter-observer agreement regarding survivability and low agreement regarding categorical preventable death classification. A valid definition and classification of TRPD is required to improve inter-observer agreement and quality of trauma care.

摘要

目的

创伤相关死亡被用作评估创伤护理质量的参数,并识别在最佳创伤护理条件下本可避免死亡的病例。本研究的目的是通过外部专家小组确定我院内创伤相关可避免死亡(TRPD)情况,并评估小组间的可靠性。

方法

确定2020年1月1日至2022年2月1日期间阿姆斯特丹大学医学中心的创伤相关死亡病例。伤情严重的患者(损伤严重度评分≥16)由一个外部多学科小组纳入可预防性分析,该小组由一名创伤外科医生、麻醉师、急诊医生、神经外科医生和法医组成。提供病例描述,并要求小组成员将死亡分类为不可避免、潜在可避免和可避免。通过Fleiss卡方统计评估五位观察者之间的一致性。

结果

共确定95例创伤相关死亡病例。其中36例死亡病例纳入分析,平均年龄为55.3岁(±24.5),69.4%为男性,88.9%为钝器伤。平均损伤严重度评分为35.3(±15.3)。外部小组内观察者间在生存可能性方面的一致性为中等(Fleiss卡方0.474),但在可预防性死亡分类方面的一致性较低(Fleiss卡方0.298)。大多数分歧存在于不可避免或潜在可避免但护理本可改善的情况之间。

结论

多学科小组审查在生存可能性方面观察者间一致性中等,在可预防性死亡分类方面一致性较低。需要对TRPD进行有效的定义和分类,以提高观察者间的一致性和创伤护理质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验